Physiological Responses in Trail Runners during a Maximal Test with Different Weighted-Vest Loads

IF 2.2 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Sports Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.3390/sports12070189
Germán Jiménez-Redondo, Bruno Castro-Frecha, Francisco Javier Martínez-Noguera, Pedro E. Alcaraz, Cristian Marín-Pagán
{"title":"Physiological Responses in Trail Runners during a Maximal Test with Different Weighted-Vest Loads","authors":"Germán Jiménez-Redondo, Bruno Castro-Frecha, Francisco Javier Martínez-Noguera, Pedro E. Alcaraz, Cristian Marín-Pagán","doi":"10.3390/sports12070189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During some trail running races, athletes have to carry hydration support, food, and technical and safety equipment, which generates an additional load that must be mobilized during the race. The aim of the present study was to determine the physiological responses to overload running and the effect they may have on metabolic zones. Seventeen well-trained male trail runners (n = 17) completed three maximal treadmill tests with weighted vests at 0%, 5%, and 10% of their body mass (L0, L5, and L10). Their gas exchange was monitored to assess their ventilatory thresholds 1 (VT1) and 2 (VT2), maximal fat oxidation zone (FatMax), and peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak). Their heart rate (HR), power, and velocity (V) were tracked to compare their behavior. One-way ANOVA showed significant differences in the V (p < 0.001; ηp2 = 0.4620) as a limitation for reaching the peak velocity (Vpeak), with a significant decrease in the Vpeak with the L10 compared to the L0 (p = 0.002) and L5 (p = 0.004). In addition, one-way ANOVA showed significant differences in the peak absolute power (p < 0.001; ηp2 = 0.468) among the groups, detecting higher power production between the L10 and L0 (p < 0.001) and between the L10 and L5 (p = 0.015). Loads higher than L5 could generated important physiological and mechanical modifications, while a load of L5 managed to maintain the working conditions without overloading. These insights shed light on nuanced strategies for optimizing performance and endurance, offering valuable considerations for athletes seeking to enhance their training regimens during overload conditions.","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12070189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During some trail running races, athletes have to carry hydration support, food, and technical and safety equipment, which generates an additional load that must be mobilized during the race. The aim of the present study was to determine the physiological responses to overload running and the effect they may have on metabolic zones. Seventeen well-trained male trail runners (n = 17) completed three maximal treadmill tests with weighted vests at 0%, 5%, and 10% of their body mass (L0, L5, and L10). Their gas exchange was monitored to assess their ventilatory thresholds 1 (VT1) and 2 (VT2), maximal fat oxidation zone (FatMax), and peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak). Their heart rate (HR), power, and velocity (V) were tracked to compare their behavior. One-way ANOVA showed significant differences in the V (p < 0.001; ηp2 = 0.4620) as a limitation for reaching the peak velocity (Vpeak), with a significant decrease in the Vpeak with the L10 compared to the L0 (p = 0.002) and L5 (p = 0.004). In addition, one-way ANOVA showed significant differences in the peak absolute power (p < 0.001; ηp2 = 0.468) among the groups, detecting higher power production between the L10 and L0 (p < 0.001) and between the L10 and L5 (p = 0.015). Loads higher than L5 could generated important physiological and mechanical modifications, while a load of L5 managed to maintain the working conditions without overloading. These insights shed light on nuanced strategies for optimizing performance and endurance, offering valuable considerations for athletes seeking to enhance their training regimens during overload conditions.
越野跑运动员在不同负重背心负荷下进行最大负荷测试时的生理反应
在一些越野跑比赛中,运动员必须携带水合支持、食物以及技术和安全设备,这就产生了额外的负荷,必须在比赛中加以调动。本研究旨在确定超负荷跑步的生理反应及其对代谢区的影响。17 名训练有素的男性越野跑运动员(n = 17)分别在体重为 0%、5% 和 10%(L0、L5 和 L10)的负重背心下完成了三项最大跑步机测试。对他们的气体交换进行监测,以评估他们的通气阈值 1(VT1)和 2(VT2)、最大脂肪氧化区(FatMax)和峰值耗氧量(VO2peak)。对他们的心率(HR)、功率和速度(V)进行了跟踪,以比较他们的行为。单因素方差分析显示,速度(V)作为达到峰值速度(Vpeak)的限制因素存在显著差异(p < 0.001;ηp2 = 0.4620),与 L0(p = 0.002)和 L5(p = 0.004)相比,L10 的 Vpeak 显著下降。此外,单因素方差分析显示,各组之间的峰值绝对功率存在显著差异(p < 0.001;ηp2 = 0.468),L10 和 L0 之间(p < 0.001)以及 L10 和 L5 之间(p = 0.015)的功率产生较高。高于 L5 的负荷可产生重要的生理和机械变化,而 L5 的负荷则可在不超负荷的情况下维持工作条件。这些见解揭示了优化性能和耐力的细微策略,为运动员在超负荷条件下寻求加强训练方案提供了有价值的考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports
Sports SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
167
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信