Teacher-Rated Mental Health of Siblings of Children with Chronic Disorders

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Caitlin M. Prentice, Stian Orm, Matteo Botta, Torun M. Vatne, Trude Fredriksen, Solveig Kirchhofer, Krister Fjermestad
{"title":"Teacher-Rated Mental Health of Siblings of Children with Chronic Disorders","authors":"Caitlin M. Prentice, Stian Orm, Matteo Botta, Torun M. Vatne, Trude Fredriksen, Solveig Kirchhofer, Krister Fjermestad","doi":"10.1007/s12310-024-09685-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Siblings of children with chronic disorders are at a heightened risk for internalizing and externalizing problems. Studies on sibling mental health typically use parent report, and sometimes sibling self-report, but do not include the perspectives of teachers. We investigated how teachers and parents in Norway rated sibling mental health to gain a more coherent picture of siblings’ well-being and functioning across the home and school contexts. We compared how siblings aged 8–16 years (45% boys, 54% girls) were scored on the strengths and difficulties questionnaire by teachers (<i>n</i> = 125), mothers (<i>n</i> = 115), and fathers (<i>n</i> = 81) with population norms and clinical cutoffs. For boys, the mean teacher scores did not indicate problems for total difficulties or any subscale except hyperactivity–inattention, but mean parent scores were higher for total difficulties and most subscales (<i>d</i> = .44 to .96). For girls, teachers indicated higher than norm scores for total difficulties, emotional problems, hyperactivity–inattention and peer problems (<i>d</i> = .26 to .46), while parents indicated higher total difficulties and problems across most subscales (<i>d</i> = .31 to .54). Prosocial behavior was as a relative strength of siblings across all raters. Siblings may not display the same level of mental health problems in school as at home, and teachers can offer an important perspective on siblings’ mental health and functioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":51538,"journal":{"name":"School Mental Health","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-024-09685-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Siblings of children with chronic disorders are at a heightened risk for internalizing and externalizing problems. Studies on sibling mental health typically use parent report, and sometimes sibling self-report, but do not include the perspectives of teachers. We investigated how teachers and parents in Norway rated sibling mental health to gain a more coherent picture of siblings’ well-being and functioning across the home and school contexts. We compared how siblings aged 8–16 years (45% boys, 54% girls) were scored on the strengths and difficulties questionnaire by teachers (n = 125), mothers (n = 115), and fathers (n = 81) with population norms and clinical cutoffs. For boys, the mean teacher scores did not indicate problems for total difficulties or any subscale except hyperactivity–inattention, but mean parent scores were higher for total difficulties and most subscales (d = .44 to .96). For girls, teachers indicated higher than norm scores for total difficulties, emotional problems, hyperactivity–inattention and peer problems (d = .26 to .46), while parents indicated higher total difficulties and problems across most subscales (d = .31 to .54). Prosocial behavior was as a relative strength of siblings across all raters. Siblings may not display the same level of mental health problems in school as at home, and teachers can offer an important perspective on siblings’ mental health and functioning.

教师对患有慢性疾病儿童的兄弟姐妹心理健康的评价
患有慢性疾病的儿童的兄弟姐妹出现内化和外化问题的风险较高。有关兄弟姐妹心理健康的研究通常使用父母的报告,有时也使用兄弟姐妹的自我报告,但不包括教师的观点。我们调查了挪威教师和家长如何评价兄弟姐妹的心理健康,以便更全面地了解兄弟姐妹在家庭和学校环境中的幸福感和功能。我们比较了教师(n = 125)、母亲(n = 115)和父亲(n = 81)对 8-16 岁兄弟姐妹(45% 为男孩,54% 为女孩)的优势和困难问卷的评分与人群标准和临床临界值。对于男孩来说,教师的平均得分并不表明他们在总困难或除多动-注意力以外的任何分量表上存在问题,但家长的平均得分在总困难和大多数分量表上都较高(d = .44 至 .96)。就女生而言,教师在总困难、情绪问题、过度活跃-注意力不集中和同伴问题方面的得分高于常模(d = 0.26 至 0.46),而家长在总困难和大多数分量表的问题方面的得分高于常模(d = 0.31 至 0.54)。在所有评分者中,亲社会行为是兄弟姐妹的相对优势。兄弟姐妹在学校中表现出的心理健康问题可能与在家中表现出的不同,而教师可以从一个重要的角度来看待兄弟姐妹的心理健康和功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: School Mental Health: A Multidisciplinary Research and Practice Journal is a forum for the latest research related to prevention, treatment, and assessment practices that are associated with the pre-K to 12th-grade education system and focuses on children and adolescents with emotional and behavioral disorders. The journal publishes empirical studies, quantitative and qualitative research, and systematic and scoping review articles from authors representing the many disciplines that are involved in school mental health, including child and school psychology, education, pediatrics, child and adolescent psychiatry, developmental psychology, school counseling, social work and nursing.  Sample topics include: ·         Innovative school-based treatment practices·         Consultation and professional development procedures·         Dissemination and implementation science targeting schools·         Educational techniques for children with emotional and behavioral disorders·         Schoolwide prevention programs·         Medication effects on school behavior and achievement·         Assessment practices·         Special education services·         Developmental implications affecting learning and behavior·         Racial, ethnic, and cultural issues·         School policy·         Role of families in school mental health·         Prediction of impairment and resilience·         Moderators and mediators of response to treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信