Commentary on “Stakeholder experiences of deprescribing psychotropic medicines for challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disabilities”

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Adam Clifford, Mariam Omokanye, Deval Bagalkote
{"title":"Commentary on “Stakeholder experiences of deprescribing psychotropic medicines for challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disabilities”","authors":"Adam Clifford, Mariam Omokanye, Deval Bagalkote","doi":"10.1108/tldr-05-2024-0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to provide a commentary response to “Stakeholder experiences of deprescribing psychotropic medicines for challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disabilities”.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The commentary provides some evidence-based perspectives on the risks and challenges of psychiatric drug-withdrawal, emphasising the importance of the patient experience in deprescribing decisions. It also makes the case for clinical clarity and carer-engagement in optimising deprescribing outcomes for individuals. Some clinical reflections are provided.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Whilst efforts to reduce the overmedication of people with learning disabilities are welcomed, there is lacking evidence around this population’s experience of adverse effects from psychiatric deprescribing decisions, including differentiating between withdrawal and relapse effects. Clinical clarity and carer engagement are key to safe and effective prescribing, although in reality, this can be challenging.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper will be of value to all professionals with a role in the effective deprescribing of psychiatric medications with and/or for people with intellectual disability. It provides perspectives on aspects of stakeholder experience that warrant further consideration and research.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":54179,"journal":{"name":"Tizard Learning Disability Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tizard Learning Disability Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tldr-05-2024-0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to provide a commentary response to “Stakeholder experiences of deprescribing psychotropic medicines for challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disabilities”.

Design/methodology/approach

The commentary provides some evidence-based perspectives on the risks and challenges of psychiatric drug-withdrawal, emphasising the importance of the patient experience in deprescribing decisions. It also makes the case for clinical clarity and carer-engagement in optimising deprescribing outcomes for individuals. Some clinical reflections are provided.

Findings

Whilst efforts to reduce the overmedication of people with learning disabilities are welcomed, there is lacking evidence around this population’s experience of adverse effects from psychiatric deprescribing decisions, including differentiating between withdrawal and relapse effects. Clinical clarity and carer engagement are key to safe and effective prescribing, although in reality, this can be challenging.

Originality/value

This paper will be of value to all professionals with a role in the effective deprescribing of psychiatric medications with and/or for people with intellectual disability. It provides perspectives on aspects of stakeholder experience that warrant further consideration and research.

关于 "利益相关者对智障人士因挑战行为而停用精神药物的经验 "的评论
本文旨在对 "利益相关者对智障人士因具有挑战性行为而停用精神药物的经验 "进行评论回应。它还提出了临床清晰度和护理人员参与优化个人停药结果的理由。研究结果尽管减少对有学习障碍的人过度用药的努力受到欢迎,但仍缺乏有关这一人群在精神科处方决策中的不良反应体验的证据,包括区分戒断和复发的影响。临床清晰度和照护者的参与是安全有效处方的关键,尽管在现实中,这可能具有挑战性。原创性/价值 本文对所有参与对智障人士和/或为智障人士有效取消精神科药物处方的专业人士都有价值。它为利益相关者的经验提供了值得进一步考虑和研究的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tizard Learning Disability Review
Tizard Learning Disability Review EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信