Let’s Talk about AI: Talking about AI is Positively Associated with AI Crafting

IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Xiaowei Dong, Luyuan Jiang, Wanlu Li, Chen Chen, Yuqing Gan, Jingtian Xia, Xin Qin
{"title":"Let’s Talk about AI: Talking about AI is Positively Associated with AI Crafting","authors":"Xiaowei Dong, Luyuan Jiang, Wanlu Li, Chen Chen, Yuqing Gan, Jingtian Xia, Xin Qin","doi":"10.1007/s10490-024-09975-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly common in organizations, and more and more employees are talking about AI with their coworkers (i.e., AI talk). However, we have limited knowledge of what effects AI talk has on employees’ psychological states and subsequent behaviors. Drawing on self-efficacy theory, we propose that talking about AI is positively associated with AI self-efficacy (i.e., the degree to which individuals think they can successfully complete AI-related tasks), which in turn increases proactive coping behavior to adapt to AI (i.e., AI crafting). Furthermore, we suggest that leader AI-focused attention moderates these positive indirect effects such that these relationships are strengthened when leaders focus more attention on AI (i.e., leader AI-focused attention is high). To test our theoretical model, we conducted an experiment and a multi-wave field study in organizations using AI. This research reveals the effects of AI talk on AI crafting via AI self-efficacy, which expands the existing AI literature and job crafting literature and provides a more comprehensive understanding of AI in the workplace.</p>","PeriodicalId":8474,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Management","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-024-09975-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly common in organizations, and more and more employees are talking about AI with their coworkers (i.e., AI talk). However, we have limited knowledge of what effects AI talk has on employees’ psychological states and subsequent behaviors. Drawing on self-efficacy theory, we propose that talking about AI is positively associated with AI self-efficacy (i.e., the degree to which individuals think they can successfully complete AI-related tasks), which in turn increases proactive coping behavior to adapt to AI (i.e., AI crafting). Furthermore, we suggest that leader AI-focused attention moderates these positive indirect effects such that these relationships are strengthened when leaders focus more attention on AI (i.e., leader AI-focused attention is high). To test our theoretical model, we conducted an experiment and a multi-wave field study in organizations using AI. This research reveals the effects of AI talk on AI crafting via AI self-efficacy, which expands the existing AI literature and job crafting literature and provides a more comprehensive understanding of AI in the workplace.

Abstract Image

让我们来谈谈人工智能:谈论人工智能与人工智能制作息息相关
人工智能(AI)在企业中越来越普遍,越来越多的员工开始与同事谈论人工智能(即 AI talk)。然而,我们对人工智能谈话对员工心理状态和后续行为的影响了解有限。借鉴自我效能理论,我们提出,谈论人工智能与人工智能自我效能(即个人认为自己能够成功完成人工智能相关任务的程度)正相关,这反过来又会增加适应人工智能的主动应对行为(即人工智能精心设计)。此外,我们还认为,领导者对人工智能的关注会调节这些积极的间接效应,当领导者对人工智能的关注度较高时(即领导者对人工智能的关注度较高),这些关系就会得到加强。为了验证我们的理论模型,我们在使用人工智能的组织中进行了一项实验和多波实地研究。这项研究通过人工智能自我效能揭示了人工智能谈话对人工智能工作的影响,拓展了现有的人工智能文献和工作精心设计文献,为工作场所的人工智能提供了更全面的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
9.30%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Asia Pacific Journal of Management publishes original manuscripts on management and organizational research in the Asia Pacific region, encompassing Pacific Rim countries and mainland Asia. APJM focuses on the extent to which each manuscript addresses matters that pertain to the most fundamental question: “What determines organization success?” The major academic disciplines that we cover include entrepreneurship, human resource management, international business, organizational behavior, and strategic management. However, manuscripts that belong to other well-established disciplines such as accounting, economics, finance, marketing, and operations generally do not fall into the scope of APJM. We endeavor to be the major vehicle for exchange of ideas and research among management scholars within or interested in the broadly defined Asia Pacific region.Key features include: Rigor - maintained through strict review processes, high quality global reviewers, and Editorial Advisory and Review Boards comprising prominent researchers from many countries. Relevance - maintained by its focus on key management and organizational trends in the region. Uniqueness - being the first and most prominent management journal published in and about the fastest growing region in the world. Official affiliation - Asia Academy of ManagementFor more information, visit the AAOM website:www.baf.cuhk.edu.hk/asia-aom/ Officially cited as: Asia Pac J Manag
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信