Uptake and physiological impacts of nanoplastics in trees with divergent water use strategies†

IF 5.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Maria Elvira Murazzi, Alice Pradel, Roman B. Schefer, Arthur Gessler and Denise M. Mitrano
{"title":"Uptake and physiological impacts of nanoplastics in trees with divergent water use strategies†","authors":"Maria Elvira Murazzi, Alice Pradel, Roman B. Schefer, Arthur Gessler and Denise M. Mitrano","doi":"10.1039/D4EN00286E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Anthropogenic contaminants can place significant stress on vegetation, especially when they are taken up into plants. Plastic pollution, including nanoplastics (NPs), could be detrimental to tree functioning, by causing, for example, oxidative stress or reducing photosynthesis. While a number of studies have explored the capacity of plants to take up NPs, few have simultaneously assessed the functional damage due to particulate matter uptake. To quantify NPs uptake by tree roots and to determine whether this resulted in subsequent physiological damage, we exposed the roots of two tree species with different water use strategies in hydroponic cultures to two concentrations (10 mg L<small><sup>−1</sup></small> and 30 mg L<small><sup>−1</sup></small>) of model metal-doped polystyrene NPs. This approach allowed us to accurately quantify low concentrations of NPs in tissues using standard approaches for metal analysis. The two contrasting tree species included Norway spruce (<em>Picea abies</em> [L.] Karst), a water conservative tree, and wild service tree (<em>Sorbus torminalis</em> [L.] Crantz), an early successional tree with a rather water spending strategy. At both exposure concentrations and at each of the experimental time points (two and four weeks), NPs were highly associated and/or concentrated inside the tree roots. In both species, maximum concentrations were observed after 2 weeks in the roots of the high concentration (HC) treatment (spruce: 2512 ± 304 μg NPs per g DW (dry weight), wild service tree: 1190 ± 823 μg NPs per g DW). In the aboveground organs (stems and leaves or needles), concentrations were one to two orders of magnitude lower than in the roots. Despite relatively similar NPs concentrations in the tree aboveground organs across treatments, there were different temporal impacts on tree physiology of the given species. Photosynthetic efficiency was reduced faster (after 2 weeks of NPs exposure) and more intensively (by 28% in the HC treatment) in wild service trees compared to Norway spruce (<em>ca.</em> 10% reduction only after 4 weeks). Our study shows that both, evergreen coniferous as well as deciduous broadleaf tree species are negatively affected in their photosynthesis by NPs uptake and transport to aboveground organs. Given the likelihood of trees facing multiple, concurrent stressors from anthropogenic pollution and climate change, including the impact of NPs, it is crucial to consider the cumulative effects on vegetation in future.</p>","PeriodicalId":73,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science: Nano","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/en/d4en00286e?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science: Nano","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/en/d4en00286e","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anthropogenic contaminants can place significant stress on vegetation, especially when they are taken up into plants. Plastic pollution, including nanoplastics (NPs), could be detrimental to tree functioning, by causing, for example, oxidative stress or reducing photosynthesis. While a number of studies have explored the capacity of plants to take up NPs, few have simultaneously assessed the functional damage due to particulate matter uptake. To quantify NPs uptake by tree roots and to determine whether this resulted in subsequent physiological damage, we exposed the roots of two tree species with different water use strategies in hydroponic cultures to two concentrations (10 mg L−1 and 30 mg L−1) of model metal-doped polystyrene NPs. This approach allowed us to accurately quantify low concentrations of NPs in tissues using standard approaches for metal analysis. The two contrasting tree species included Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst), a water conservative tree, and wild service tree (Sorbus torminalis [L.] Crantz), an early successional tree with a rather water spending strategy. At both exposure concentrations and at each of the experimental time points (two and four weeks), NPs were highly associated and/or concentrated inside the tree roots. In both species, maximum concentrations were observed after 2 weeks in the roots of the high concentration (HC) treatment (spruce: 2512 ± 304 μg NPs per g DW (dry weight), wild service tree: 1190 ± 823 μg NPs per g DW). In the aboveground organs (stems and leaves or needles), concentrations were one to two orders of magnitude lower than in the roots. Despite relatively similar NPs concentrations in the tree aboveground organs across treatments, there were different temporal impacts on tree physiology of the given species. Photosynthetic efficiency was reduced faster (after 2 weeks of NPs exposure) and more intensively (by 28% in the HC treatment) in wild service trees compared to Norway spruce (ca. 10% reduction only after 4 weeks). Our study shows that both, evergreen coniferous as well as deciduous broadleaf tree species are negatively affected in their photosynthesis by NPs uptake and transport to aboveground organs. Given the likelihood of trees facing multiple, concurrent stressors from anthropogenic pollution and climate change, including the impact of NPs, it is crucial to consider the cumulative effects on vegetation in future.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

不同用水策略的树木对纳米塑料的吸收和生理影响
人为污染物会对植被造成巨大压力,尤其是当它们被植物吸收时。包括纳米塑料(NPs)在内的塑料污染可能会对树木的功能造成损害,例如造成氧化应激或降低光合作用。虽然许多研究都探讨了植物吸收 NPs 的能力,但很少有研究同时评估了吸收颗粒物质所造成的功能损害。为了量化树木根系对 NPs 的吸收,并确定这是否会导致随后的生理损害,我们将水培法培养的两种不同用水策略的树木根系暴露于两种浓度(10 毫克/升-1 和 30 毫克/升-1)的模型掺金属聚苯乙烯 NPs 中。这种方法使我们能够利用金属分析的标准方法准确量化组织中的低浓度 NPs。两种截然不同的树种包括挪威云杉(Picea abies [L.] Karst)和野役树(Sorbus torminalis [L.] Crantz),前者是一种节约用水的树种,后者则是一种早期演替树种,具有相当的耗水策略。在两种接触浓度和每个实验时间点(两周和四周),NPs 都与树根高度相关和/或集中在树根内部。在这两种树种中,高浓度(HC)处理的树根在 2 周后浓度最高(云杉:2512 ± 304 μg NPs per g DW(干重);野役树:1190 ± 823 μg NPs per g DW(干重)):1190 ± 823 μg NPs/克干重)。地上部分(茎、叶或针叶)的 NPs 浓度比根部低一到两个数量级。尽管不同处理中树木地上器官中的 NPs 浓度相对相似,但对特定物种的树木生理产生的时间影响却不同。与挪威云杉(4 周后才降低约 10%)相比,野生役用树的光合作用效率降低得更快(接触 NPs 2 周后)、更严重(在 HC 处理中降低了 28%)。我们的研究表明,常绿针叶树种和落叶阔叶树种的光合作用都会受到 NPs 吸收和传输到地上器官的负面影响。鉴于树木可能同时面临人为污染和气候变化等多重压力,包括氮磷的影响,因此考虑未来对植被的累积影响至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science: Nano
Environmental Science: Nano CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
5.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science: Nano serves as a comprehensive and high-impact peer-reviewed source of information on the design and demonstration of engineered nanomaterials for environment-based applications. It also covers the interactions between engineered, natural, and incidental nanomaterials with biological and environmental systems. This scope includes, but is not limited to, the following topic areas: Novel nanomaterial-based applications for water, air, soil, food, and energy sustainability Nanomaterial interactions with biological systems and nanotoxicology Environmental fate, reactivity, and transformations of nanoscale materials Nanoscale processes in the environment Sustainable nanotechnology including rational nanomaterial design, life cycle assessment, risk/benefit analysis
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信