Yurok–wildlife relationship through the context of Traditional Ecological Knowledge

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Seafha C. Ramos, Tiana Williams-Claussen, Celina Natoyiipoka Gray
{"title":"Yurok–wildlife relationship through the context of Traditional Ecological Knowledge","authors":"Seafha C. Ramos,&nbsp;Tiana Williams-Claussen,&nbsp;Celina Natoyiipoka Gray","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Various aspects of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) continue to be integrated in the wildlife conservation and management discourse; however, there may be challenges in cross-cultural understanding of the complex social-ecological systems that make up the fabric of TEK. In a 2-phased approach, we implemented research to better understand an Indigenous perspective of human–wildlife relationship. In phase 1, we conducted 16 semi-structured interviews with Yurok and Yurok-affiliated people about the relationship of Yurok people with wildlife and Yurok community hunting values. In phase 2, we conducted a secondary analysis of a subset of 10 interviews from phase 1. Permissions were obtained from the Yurok Tribe, under the project's previously established Institutional Review Board process, to access archived interview data for subsequent research relevant to the original research goals. We identified the following themes: Yurok conceptualizations of wildlife, cultural understanding of animals as people, animal harvesting protocols, cultural guidelines that maintain wildlife populations, and consequences for not following cultural guidelines as related to hunting. We explored how the terms wildlife and wildlife management are difficult to interpret within the context of Yurok TEK, as wildlife, in the same meaning as Western wildlife management, does not exist in the Yurok cultural paradigm. A fundamental, multifaceted aspect of the Yurok–wildlife relationship through a TEK context is the concept of animals as people, which we discuss in relation to Yurok spirituality. As Indigenous Knowledge continues to be recognized in scientific discourse, there may be opportunities to reconceptualize, Indigenize, and shift approaches to research, wildlife and wildlife habitat management, and conservation. Results of our study may support Yurok Tribe wildlife managers, Western-trained biologists, and others in their considerations of Indigenous Knowledge in wildlife management and conservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22624","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various aspects of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) continue to be integrated in the wildlife conservation and management discourse; however, there may be challenges in cross-cultural understanding of the complex social-ecological systems that make up the fabric of TEK. In a 2-phased approach, we implemented research to better understand an Indigenous perspective of human–wildlife relationship. In phase 1, we conducted 16 semi-structured interviews with Yurok and Yurok-affiliated people about the relationship of Yurok people with wildlife and Yurok community hunting values. In phase 2, we conducted a secondary analysis of a subset of 10 interviews from phase 1. Permissions were obtained from the Yurok Tribe, under the project's previously established Institutional Review Board process, to access archived interview data for subsequent research relevant to the original research goals. We identified the following themes: Yurok conceptualizations of wildlife, cultural understanding of animals as people, animal harvesting protocols, cultural guidelines that maintain wildlife populations, and consequences for not following cultural guidelines as related to hunting. We explored how the terms wildlife and wildlife management are difficult to interpret within the context of Yurok TEK, as wildlife, in the same meaning as Western wildlife management, does not exist in the Yurok cultural paradigm. A fundamental, multifaceted aspect of the Yurok–wildlife relationship through a TEK context is the concept of animals as people, which we discuss in relation to Yurok spirituality. As Indigenous Knowledge continues to be recognized in scientific discourse, there may be opportunities to reconceptualize, Indigenize, and shift approaches to research, wildlife and wildlife habitat management, and conservation. Results of our study may support Yurok Tribe wildlife managers, Western-trained biologists, and others in their considerations of Indigenous Knowledge in wildlife management and conservation.

Abstract Image

通过传统生态知识了解尤罗克人与野生动物的关系
传统生态知识(TEK)的各个方面继续被纳入野生动植物保护和管理的讨论中;然而,对于构成传统生态知识结构的复杂社会生态系统的跨文化理解可能存在挑战。我们分两个阶段开展研究,以更好地理解土著居民对人类与野生动物关系的看法。在第 1 阶段,我们就尤洛克人与野生动物的关系以及尤洛克社区的狩猎价值观对尤洛克人和与尤洛克有关联的人进行了 16 次半结构式访谈。在第二阶段,我们对第一阶段的 10 个访谈子集进行了二次分析。根据项目先前设立的机构审查委员会程序,我们从尤洛克部落获得了访问存档访谈数据的许可,以便进行与最初研究目标相关的后续研究。我们确定了以下主题:尤罗克人对野生动物的概念、在文化上将动物理解为人、动物捕猎协议、维持野生动物数量的文化准则,以及不遵守与狩猎有关的文化准则的后果。我们探讨了野生动物和野生动物管理这两个术语在尤罗克传统知识中是如何难以解释的,因为在尤罗克文化范式中,与西方野生动物管理含义相同的野生动物并不存在。在尤洛克传统知识背景下,尤洛克人与野生动物之间关系的一个基本的、多层面的方面是动物即人的概念,我们将结合尤洛克人的精神信仰对此进行讨论。随着原住民知识在科学话语中不断得到认可,可能会有机会对研究、野生动物和野生动物栖息地管理及保护进行重新概念化、原住民化和方法转变。我们的研究结果可以帮助尤罗克部落的野生动物管理人员、接受过西方培训的生物学家和其他人在野生动物管理和保护中考虑土著知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信