Monitoring questing winter tick abundance on traditional moose hunting lands

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Juliana A. Berube, Alexej P. K. Sirén, Benjamin D. Simpson, Kelly B. Klingler, Tammy L. Wilson
{"title":"Monitoring questing winter tick abundance on traditional moose hunting lands","authors":"Juliana A. Berube,&nbsp;Alexej P. K. Sirén,&nbsp;Benjamin D. Simpson,&nbsp;Kelly B. Klingler,&nbsp;Tammy L. Wilson","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>An important symbolic and subsistence animal for many Native American Tribes, the moose (<i>Alces alces</i>; mos in Algonquin, Penobscot language) has been under consistent threat in the northeastern United States because of winter tick (<i>Dermacentor albipictus</i>) parasitism over the past several decades, causing declines in moose populations throughout the region. This decline has raised concern for Tribes and agencies that are invested in moose. Given this concern, it is increasingly important to effectively monitor and develop strategies to manage winter ticks to address consistent population declines of moose due to winter ticks. The Penobscot Nation developed a novel strategy to sample questing winter ticks (i.e., ticks that are actively seeking hosts) using a plot-based sampling protocol that may be suitable for heterogeneous habitats. We deployed this protocol in the northeastern United States in 2022 during the tick questing period (Sep–Dec) on Penobscot Nation sovereign trust lands, the White Mountain National Forest and Umbagog National Wildlife Refuge, and western-central Massachusetts, USA. We analyzed the data using occupancy and N-mixture models. Detection probability peaked during mid-October and tick occupancy and abundance were greatest at sites with intermediate understory vegetation height. The sampling protocol was successful at sampling ticks in Massachusetts, where abundances were expected to be low, indicating that it may be useful for studies planning to monitor winter tick distribution and abundance in areas with sub-optimal moose habitat and where winter tick abundance is expected to be low. This approach may also benefit managers or researchers intending to monitor many species of hard ticks, and where imperfect detection is expected.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.22630","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22630","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An important symbolic and subsistence animal for many Native American Tribes, the moose (Alces alces; mos in Algonquin, Penobscot language) has been under consistent threat in the northeastern United States because of winter tick (Dermacentor albipictus) parasitism over the past several decades, causing declines in moose populations throughout the region. This decline has raised concern for Tribes and agencies that are invested in moose. Given this concern, it is increasingly important to effectively monitor and develop strategies to manage winter ticks to address consistent population declines of moose due to winter ticks. The Penobscot Nation developed a novel strategy to sample questing winter ticks (i.e., ticks that are actively seeking hosts) using a plot-based sampling protocol that may be suitable for heterogeneous habitats. We deployed this protocol in the northeastern United States in 2022 during the tick questing period (Sep–Dec) on Penobscot Nation sovereign trust lands, the White Mountain National Forest and Umbagog National Wildlife Refuge, and western-central Massachusetts, USA. We analyzed the data using occupancy and N-mixture models. Detection probability peaked during mid-October and tick occupancy and abundance were greatest at sites with intermediate understory vegetation height. The sampling protocol was successful at sampling ticks in Massachusetts, where abundances were expected to be low, indicating that it may be useful for studies planning to monitor winter tick distribution and abundance in areas with sub-optimal moose habitat and where winter tick abundance is expected to be low. This approach may also benefit managers or researchers intending to monitor many species of hard ticks, and where imperfect detection is expected.

Abstract Image

监测传统驼鹿狩猎地的冬季蜱虫数量
驼鹿(Alces alces;在阿尔冈昆语、佩诺布斯科特语中为 mos)是许多美洲原住民部落的重要象征性动物和生计动物,在过去几十年中,由于冬季蜱虫(Dermacentor albipictus)的寄生,驼鹿在美国东北部一直受到威胁,导致整个地区的驼鹿数量下降。这种下降引起了部落和投资驼鹿的机构的关注。有鉴于此,有效监控和制定冬季蜱虫管理策略以应对冬季蜱虫导致的驼鹿数量持续下降变得越来越重要。佩诺布斯科特部落开发了一种新颖的策略,使用基于小区的采样协议对正在寻找宿主的冬季蜱虫(即积极寻找宿主的蜱虫)进行采样,该采样协议可能适用于不同的栖息地。我们于 2022 年蜱虫寻主期(9 月至 12 月)在美国东北部的佩诺布斯科特国家主权信托土地、白山国家森林公园和 Umbagog 国家野生动物保护区以及美国马萨诸塞州中西部部署了这一方案。我们使用占位和 N 混合物模型对数据进行了分析。检测概率在 10 月中旬达到峰值,蜱虫占据率和丰度在具有中等林下植被高度的地点最高。该取样方案在马萨诸塞州的蜱虫取样中取得了成功,而该地区的蜱虫丰度预计较低,这表明该方案可能对计划在驼鹿栖息地不理想、冬季蜱虫丰度预计较低的地区监测冬季蜱虫分布和丰度的研究有用。这种方法也可能对打算监测多种硬蜱和预计检测不完全的管理者或研究人员有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
188
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信