{"title":"Factors Contributing to Slab Locations and Geometries in Reconstructions of Past Mantle Flow","authors":"Joshua Weber, Nicolas Flament","doi":"10.1029/2023GC011313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Individual sinking slabs present markedly different geometries between 410 and 660 km depths, from vertical slabs penetrating the lower mantle to slabs stagnating above the lower mantle. The proposed factors determining these contrasted geometries include mantle viscosity and the magnitude and evolution of trench retreat. Here, we assess the success of paleo-geographically driven global mantle flow models in matching slabs in tomographic models between 400 km and 1,000 km depth. We quantify the spatial match between predicted present-day mantle temperature anomalies and vote maps of tomographic models. We investigate the sensitivity of the spatial match to input parameters of the mantle flow model: imposed tectonic reconstruction, model start age, and viscosity contrast between the upper and lower mantle. We evaluate the visual match between model slabs and tomographic vote maps for three circum-Pacific regions with contrasted slab dip angles between 400 km and 1,000 km depth. Predicted model slabs better match slabs inferred from tomography when there is an increase in viscosity at 660 km depth. The temporal evolution of the models and the global match at present day suggest that the subduction history could be refined in the global tectonic reconstructions that we considered. For example, we suggest that the subduction to the east of Japan should be offset by approximately 100 km to the west at ∼80 Ma to match the anchoring of a continuous slab into the lower mantle suggested by tomography.</p>","PeriodicalId":50422,"journal":{"name":"Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems","volume":"25 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023GC011313","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023GC011313","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Individual sinking slabs present markedly different geometries between 410 and 660 km depths, from vertical slabs penetrating the lower mantle to slabs stagnating above the lower mantle. The proposed factors determining these contrasted geometries include mantle viscosity and the magnitude and evolution of trench retreat. Here, we assess the success of paleo-geographically driven global mantle flow models in matching slabs in tomographic models between 400 km and 1,000 km depth. We quantify the spatial match between predicted present-day mantle temperature anomalies and vote maps of tomographic models. We investigate the sensitivity of the spatial match to input parameters of the mantle flow model: imposed tectonic reconstruction, model start age, and viscosity contrast between the upper and lower mantle. We evaluate the visual match between model slabs and tomographic vote maps for three circum-Pacific regions with contrasted slab dip angles between 400 km and 1,000 km depth. Predicted model slabs better match slabs inferred from tomography when there is an increase in viscosity at 660 km depth. The temporal evolution of the models and the global match at present day suggest that the subduction history could be refined in the global tectonic reconstructions that we considered. For example, we suggest that the subduction to the east of Japan should be offset by approximately 100 km to the west at ∼80 Ma to match the anchoring of a continuous slab into the lower mantle suggested by tomography.
期刊介绍:
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems (G3) publishes research papers on Earth and planetary processes with a focus on understanding the Earth as a system. Observational, experimental, and theoretical investigations of the solid Earth, hydrosphere, atmosphere, biosphere, and solar system at all spatial and temporal scales are welcome. Articles should be of broad interest, and interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged.
Areas of interest for this peer-reviewed journal include, but are not limited to:
The physics and chemistry of the Earth, including its structure, composition, physical properties, dynamics, and evolution
Principles and applications of geochemical proxies to studies of Earth history
The physical properties, composition, and temporal evolution of the Earth''s major reservoirs and the coupling between them
The dynamics of geochemical and biogeochemical cycles at all spatial and temporal scales
Physical and cosmochemical constraints on the composition, origin, and evolution of the Earth and other terrestrial planets
The chemistry and physics of solar system materials that are relevant to the formation, evolution, and current state of the Earth and the planets
Advances in modeling, observation, and experimentation that are of widespread interest in the geosciences.