Persistence of the African baobab (Adansonia digitata L.) in a system experiencing chronic utilization by elephants

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Jarryd Foster, Timothy O'Connor, Vernon Visser, Timm Hoffman
{"title":"Persistence of the African baobab (Adansonia digitata L.) in a system experiencing chronic utilization by elephants","authors":"Jarryd Foster,&nbsp;Timothy O'Connor,&nbsp;Vernon Visser,&nbsp;Timm Hoffman","doi":"10.1111/csp2.13151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Chronic utilization of woody vegetation by African savanna elephants may transform woodland vegetation to open savanna and threaten the extirpation of targeted species. This situation has arisen in Gonarezhou National Park (GNP), Zimbabwe, where a large elephant population (&gt;2 km<sup>−2</sup>) threatens the persistence of the long-lived baobab (<i>Adansonia digitata</i>) tree, through elevated mortality levels. This study investigated whether complete or partial refugia from elephant utilization existed for baobabs, and whether protection of trees by management, using wire netting or log- or rock-packs around a tree base, had been effective. A total of 563 baobabs were sampled across northern GNP. Elephants had debarked 99% of trees to some degree, and gouged holes in the stem of 22% of trees. The probability, and severity, of debarking and gouging decreased with increasing distance to permanent water, increasing slope, and the amount of boulder cover. Slope gradient had the greatest effect on elephant impact, with trees located on steep slopes being less affected by elephants than those on flat ground. Distance to water had an effect despite the farthest tree, at 9 km from water, being within the 15 km foraging range of bull elephants. Large boulders partly protected trees even on gentle terrain. None of these factors provided a complete refuge from elephant impact within GNP, but, individually and collectively, provided a partial refuge at current elephant densities. Protection measures doubled tree survival over approximately 5 years, with fencing wire wrapped around baobab stems proving to be the most effective method. Assessment of the future security of baobabs in GNP requires knowledge of their distribution and that of the refugia provided by distance from permanent water, slope, and boulder cover.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"6 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.13151","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.13151","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic utilization of woody vegetation by African savanna elephants may transform woodland vegetation to open savanna and threaten the extirpation of targeted species. This situation has arisen in Gonarezhou National Park (GNP), Zimbabwe, where a large elephant population (>2 km−2) threatens the persistence of the long-lived baobab (Adansonia digitata) tree, through elevated mortality levels. This study investigated whether complete or partial refugia from elephant utilization existed for baobabs, and whether protection of trees by management, using wire netting or log- or rock-packs around a tree base, had been effective. A total of 563 baobabs were sampled across northern GNP. Elephants had debarked 99% of trees to some degree, and gouged holes in the stem of 22% of trees. The probability, and severity, of debarking and gouging decreased with increasing distance to permanent water, increasing slope, and the amount of boulder cover. Slope gradient had the greatest effect on elephant impact, with trees located on steep slopes being less affected by elephants than those on flat ground. Distance to water had an effect despite the farthest tree, at 9 km from water, being within the 15 km foraging range of bull elephants. Large boulders partly protected trees even on gentle terrain. None of these factors provided a complete refuge from elephant impact within GNP, but, individually and collectively, provided a partial refuge at current elephant densities. Protection measures doubled tree survival over approximately 5 years, with fencing wire wrapped around baobab stems proving to be the most effective method. Assessment of the future security of baobabs in GNP requires knowledge of their distribution and that of the refugia provided by distance from permanent water, slope, and boulder cover.

Abstract Image

非洲猴面包树(Adansonia digitata L.)在一个长期被大象利用的系统中的持久性
非洲稀树草原大象对木本植物的长期利用可能会将林地植被转变为开阔的稀树草原,并威胁到目标物种的灭绝。这种情况出现在津巴布韦的贡纳雷州国家公园(GNP),那里的大象种群(>2 km-2)因死亡率升高而威胁着长寿猴面包树(Adansonia digitata)的生存。这项研究调查了猴面包树是否存在完全或部分的庇护所,以避免被大象利用,以及通过在树基周围使用铁丝网、原木或岩石包等管理方式保护树木是否有效。在尼泊尔国家公园北部共对 563 棵猴面包树进行了采样。99%的树木在某种程度上被大象剥皮,22%的树木在树干上凿洞。剥皮和凿洞的概率和严重程度随着距离永久性水源的增加、坡度的增加和巨石覆盖面积的增加而降低。坡度对大象的影响最大,陡坡上的树木比平地上的树木受大象的影响要小。尽管距离水源最远的树木(距离水源 9 公里)在公牛象 15 公里的觅食范围内,但距离水源的远近也有影响。即使在地势平缓的地方,大石头也能部分保护树木。这些因素都不能完全避免大象对 GNP 的影响,但在目前大象密度的情况下,单独或共同提供了部分保护。在大约 5 年的时间里,保护措施使树木的存活率提高了一倍,事实证明,在猴面包树茎上缠绕栅栏铁丝是最有效的方法。要评估猴面包树在贡布国家公园未来的安全状况,需要了解猴面包树的分布情况,以及与永久性水源、斜坡和巨石覆盖物的距离所提供的庇护所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation Science and Practice BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
240
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信