Endoscopic techniques for management of large colorectal polyps, strictures and leaks

IF 1.4 Q3 SURGERY
Stuart R. Gordon, Lauren S. Eichenwald, Hannah K. Systrom
{"title":"Endoscopic techniques for management of large colorectal polyps, strictures and leaks","authors":"Stuart R. Gordon,&nbsp;Lauren S. Eichenwald,&nbsp;Hannah K. Systrom","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.06.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The implementation of screening colonoscopy with polyp removal has significantly decreased mortality rates associated with colorectal cancer (CRC), although it remains a major cause of cancer-related deaths globally. CRC typically originates from adenomatous polyps, and increased removal of these growths has led to reduced CRC incidence and mortality. Endoscopic polypectomy techniques, including hot and cold snare polypectomy, play a pivotal role in this process. While both methods are effective for small polyps (&lt;10 mm), recent evidence favors cold snare polypectomy due to its superior safety profile and comparable complete resection rates. Large polyps (&gt;10 mm), particularly those with advanced features, pose increased cancer risks and often require meticulous assessment and advanced endoscopic techniques, including endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), for resection.</p><p>This chapter also provides a practical overview of endoscopic techniques for managing colonic obstructions and pericolonic fluid collections, detailing their indications, advantages, disadvantages, and complications. The goal is to improve understanding and application in clinical practice. Additionally, we provide a summary of endoscopic closure techniques that have revolutionized the management of perforations and fistulas, offering safe and effective alternatives to surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":"20 ","pages":"Pages 156-168"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258984502400099X/pdfft?md5=0d4d6a919441bb919a1e1d063ce11985&pid=1-s2.0-S258984502400099X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258984502400099X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The implementation of screening colonoscopy with polyp removal has significantly decreased mortality rates associated with colorectal cancer (CRC), although it remains a major cause of cancer-related deaths globally. CRC typically originates from adenomatous polyps, and increased removal of these growths has led to reduced CRC incidence and mortality. Endoscopic polypectomy techniques, including hot and cold snare polypectomy, play a pivotal role in this process. While both methods are effective for small polyps (<10 mm), recent evidence favors cold snare polypectomy due to its superior safety profile and comparable complete resection rates. Large polyps (>10 mm), particularly those with advanced features, pose increased cancer risks and often require meticulous assessment and advanced endoscopic techniques, including endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), for resection.

This chapter also provides a practical overview of endoscopic techniques for managing colonic obstructions and pericolonic fluid collections, detailing their indications, advantages, disadvantages, and complications. The goal is to improve understanding and application in clinical practice. Additionally, we provide a summary of endoscopic closure techniques that have revolutionized the management of perforations and fistulas, offering safe and effective alternatives to surgery.

治疗大肠息肉、狭窄和渗漏的内窥镜技术
实施切除息肉的结肠镜筛查后,与结直肠癌(CRC)相关的死亡率明显下降,但它仍然是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因。结直肠癌通常源于腺瘤性息肉,增加息肉切除可降低结直肠癌的发病率和死亡率。在这一过程中,内窥镜息肉切除术(包括热和冷套管息肉切除术)发挥了关键作用。虽然这两种方法对小息肉(10 毫米)都有效,但最近的证据表明,冷镜息肉切除术因其更高的安全性和可比的完全切除率而更受青睐。大息肉(<10 mm),尤其是那些具有晚期特征的息肉,会增加患癌风险,通常需要细致的评估和先进的内镜技术,包括内镜下粘膜切除术(EMR)和内镜下粘膜下剥离术(ESD),才能进行切除。本章还对处理结肠梗阻和结肠周围积液的内窥镜技术进行了实用性概述,详细介绍了这些技术的适应症、优点、缺点和并发症,目的是提高临床实践中的理解和应用。此外,我们还总结了内窥镜闭合技术,这些技术彻底改变了穿孔和瘘管的治疗方法,为手术提供了安全有效的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信