Impact of advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques on the precise diagnosis of multiple sclerosis

IF 1.7 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Mohammed Sobhy , Ghada A. Khouqeer , Ahmad Khalifa , Ahlam A. Alhuiti , Bandar S. Al Alhindi , Salim T. El-Basyouny , Ahmed Elgarayhi , Mohammed Sallah
{"title":"Impact of advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques on the precise diagnosis of multiple sclerosis","authors":"Mohammed Sobhy ,&nbsp;Ghada A. Khouqeer ,&nbsp;Ahmad Khalifa ,&nbsp;Ahlam A. Alhuiti ,&nbsp;Bandar S. Al Alhindi ,&nbsp;Salim T. El-Basyouny ,&nbsp;Ahmed Elgarayhi ,&nbsp;Mohammed Sallah","doi":"10.1016/j.jrras.2024.101016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A neurological disorder that affects many people globally, multiple sclerosis (MS) is mysterious and complicated. MRI is an efficient tool in diagnosing and monitoring MS, that enables visualizing the characteristic demyelinating lesions that are a hallmark of MS. To evaluate the effectiveness of DIR sequence in identifying MS lesions, we compared DIR sequences at both 1.5 and 3 T MRI scanners with FLAIR. The study spanned 6–9 months at Ain Shams University, Egypt. The study comprised 50 individuals who had a confirmed diagnosis of MS. A cohort of 50 patients were divided between two MRI scanners: 25 at 1.5 T and 25 at 3 T. The group has 42 females (84% of the participants) and 8 males (16% of the participants). The average age was 31.5 years (±6.7) for those who underwent the 1.5 T MRI scan and 32.47 years (±6.7) for those who underwent the 3 T MRI scan. With <em>p-</em>values of 0.6 and 0.8, respectively, the results showed that there were no statistically significant variations in lesion size between DIR and FLAIR at 1.5 T and 3 T MRI scanners. With <em>p-</em>values less than 0.05, the results showed that DIR considerably outperformed FLAIR in terms of lesion intensity at both 1.5 T and 3 T. Regarding the number of lesions, the results demonstrated that DIR was more effective than FLAIR at both 1.5 T and 3 T, with <em>p-</em>values of 0.008 and 0.006 respectively. DIR has become an indispensable tool in diagnosing and managing multiple sclerosis. Comparing FLAIR to DIR showed superiority in detecting number of lesions and intensity of lesions by DIR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687850724002000/pdfft?md5=e1839cfab4a7de99903995b168b5d423&pid=1-s2.0-S1687850724002000-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687850724002000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A neurological disorder that affects many people globally, multiple sclerosis (MS) is mysterious and complicated. MRI is an efficient tool in diagnosing and monitoring MS, that enables visualizing the characteristic demyelinating lesions that are a hallmark of MS. To evaluate the effectiveness of DIR sequence in identifying MS lesions, we compared DIR sequences at both 1.5 and 3 T MRI scanners with FLAIR. The study spanned 6–9 months at Ain Shams University, Egypt. The study comprised 50 individuals who had a confirmed diagnosis of MS. A cohort of 50 patients were divided between two MRI scanners: 25 at 1.5 T and 25 at 3 T. The group has 42 females (84% of the participants) and 8 males (16% of the participants). The average age was 31.5 years (±6.7) for those who underwent the 1.5 T MRI scan and 32.47 years (±6.7) for those who underwent the 3 T MRI scan. With p-values of 0.6 and 0.8, respectively, the results showed that there were no statistically significant variations in lesion size between DIR and FLAIR at 1.5 T and 3 T MRI scanners. With p-values less than 0.05, the results showed that DIR considerably outperformed FLAIR in terms of lesion intensity at both 1.5 T and 3 T. Regarding the number of lesions, the results demonstrated that DIR was more effective than FLAIR at both 1.5 T and 3 T, with p-values of 0.008 and 0.006 respectively. DIR has become an indispensable tool in diagnosing and managing multiple sclerosis. Comparing FLAIR to DIR showed superiority in detecting number of lesions and intensity of lesions by DIR.

先进磁共振成像技术对精确诊断多发性硬化症的影响
多发性硬化症(MS)是一种影响全球许多人的神经系统疾病,既神秘又复杂。核磁共振成像是诊断和监测多发性硬化症的有效工具,能直观显示多发性硬化症的特征性脱髓鞘病变。为了评估 DIR 序列在识别 MS 病变方面的有效性,我们将 1.5 T 和 3 T MRI 扫描仪上的 DIR 序列与 FLAIR 进行了比较。该研究在埃及艾因夏姆斯大学进行,为期 6-9 个月。研究对象包括 50 名确诊为多发性硬化症的患者。50 名患者被分成两组,分别接受 1.5 T 和 3 T MRI 扫描。接受 1.5 T 核磁共振扫描者的平均年龄为 31.5 岁(±6.7),接受 3 T 核磁共振扫描者的平均年龄为 32.47 岁(±6.7)。结果显示,在 1.5 T 和 3 T MRI 扫描仪上,DIR 和 FLAIR 的病灶大小差异不大,P 值分别为 0.6 和 0.8。在病灶数量方面,结果表明 DIR 在 1.5 T 和 3 T 扫描时比 FLAIR 更有效,p 值分别为 0.008 和 0.006,p 值均小于 0.05。DIR 已成为诊断和治疗多发性硬化不可或缺的工具。FLAIR 与 DIR 的比较显示,DIR 在检测病灶数量和病灶强度方面更具优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences provides a high quality medium for the publication of substantial, original and scientific and technological papers on the development and applications of nuclear, radiation and isotopes in biology, medicine, drugs, biochemistry, microbiology, agriculture, entomology, food technology, chemistry, physics, solid states, engineering, environmental and applied sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信