Development of a Competency Assessment Framework for Pharmacy Residents Participating in High-Fidelity Simulation and Creation of the SIMPHARM Assessment Tool.

The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-07-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4212/cjhp.3552
Patrick Jf Deschênes, My Hanh Luu Hoai, Justine Rinfret, Sarah Pelletier, Alessandra Stortini, Rachel Therrien, Marie-Kim Héraut, Pascaline Bernier, John Nam-Kha Nguyen
{"title":"Development of a Competency Assessment Framework for Pharmacy Residents Participating in High-Fidelity Simulation and Creation of the SIMPHARM Assessment Tool.","authors":"Patrick Jf Deschênes, My Hanh Luu Hoai, Justine Rinfret, Sarah Pelletier, Alessandra Stortini, Rachel Therrien, Marie-Kim Héraut, Pascaline Bernier, John Nam-Kha Nguyen","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simulations are used to improve professional practice across multiple health professions; however, the application of simulations in pharmacy curricula has been limited by a lack of evidence.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To delineate the competencies of pharmacy residents needed to assess their progress while participating in a high-fidelity simulation training program and to create a reliable assessment tool based on these competencies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review was conducted, followed by application of a modified Delphi method. An assessment tool based on the results of these activities was drafted (in French). A second modified Delphi process was carried out to assess the reliability of the tool, and the tool was modified accordingly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search yielded a total of 2670 articles, of which 289 were included for analysis. The first modified Delphi process involved 19 experts in the first round and 10 experts in the second round. The Cronbach α was 0.866 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.713-0.960), indicating good reliability. A total of 7 competencies were retained for inclusion in the SIMPHARM assessment tool: professionalism, leadership, teamwork, communication, critical thinking, preparation and packaging of medications, and pharmaceutical calculations. The second modified Delphi process involved 9 experts in the first round and 11 experts in the second round. The final Cronbach α was 0.877 (95% CI 0.741-0.960).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To the authors' knowledge, this was one of the largest studies exploring pharmacy competencies in the context of simulations. This work yielded a reliable framework for the assessment of pharmacy residents' competencies. This assessment tool may help evaluators in assessing the competencies of pharmacy trainees after simulation training.</p>","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":"77 3","pages":"e3552"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11210595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Simulations are used to improve professional practice across multiple health professions; however, the application of simulations in pharmacy curricula has been limited by a lack of evidence.

Objectives: To delineate the competencies of pharmacy residents needed to assess their progress while participating in a high-fidelity simulation training program and to create a reliable assessment tool based on these competencies.

Methods: A literature review was conducted, followed by application of a modified Delphi method. An assessment tool based on the results of these activities was drafted (in French). A second modified Delphi process was carried out to assess the reliability of the tool, and the tool was modified accordingly.

Results: The literature search yielded a total of 2670 articles, of which 289 were included for analysis. The first modified Delphi process involved 19 experts in the first round and 10 experts in the second round. The Cronbach α was 0.866 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.713-0.960), indicating good reliability. A total of 7 competencies were retained for inclusion in the SIMPHARM assessment tool: professionalism, leadership, teamwork, communication, critical thinking, preparation and packaging of medications, and pharmaceutical calculations. The second modified Delphi process involved 9 experts in the first round and 11 experts in the second round. The final Cronbach α was 0.877 (95% CI 0.741-0.960).

Conclusions: To the authors' knowledge, this was one of the largest studies exploring pharmacy competencies in the context of simulations. This work yielded a reliable framework for the assessment of pharmacy residents' competencies. This assessment tool may help evaluators in assessing the competencies of pharmacy trainees after simulation training.

为参与高仿真模拟的药学住院医师制定能力评估框架并创建 SIMPHARM 评估工具。
背景:模拟被用于改善多个卫生专业的专业实践;然而,由于缺乏证据,模拟在药学课程中的应用一直受到限制:界定药学住院医师在参与高保真模拟培训项目时评估其进展所需的能力,并根据这些能力创建可靠的评估工具:方法: 先进行文献综述,然后采用改良德尔菲法。根据这些活动的结果起草了评估工具(法语)。为评估该工具的可靠性,进行了第二次修改后的德尔菲程序,并对工具进行了相应的修改:文献检索共获得 2670 篇文章,其中 289 篇被纳入分析。第一轮修改后的德尔菲程序有 19 位专家参与,第二轮有 10 位专家参与。Cronbach α 为 0.866(95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.713-0.960),显示出良好的可靠性。共有 7 项能力被保留下来,纳入 SIMPHARM 评估工具:专业精神、领导能力、团队合作、沟通、批判性思维、药物配制和包装以及药物计算。第二轮修改后的德尔菲程序第一轮有 9 位专家参与,第二轮有 11 位专家参与。最终的 Cronbach α 为 0.877(95% CI 0.741-0.960):据作者所知,这是在模拟背景下探索药学能力的最大规模研究之一。这项工作为评估药学住院医师的能力提供了一个可靠的框架。该评估工具可帮助评估人员在模拟培训后评估药剂学学员的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信