[Perception of cannabis use in the adolescent population: metasynthesis of qualitative studies].

Julia Rey-Brandariz, Ana Teijeiro, Mónica Pérez-Ríos, Cristina Candal-Pedreira, Andrea Vila Fariñas, Nerea Mourino, Beatriz Casal Acción, Leonor Varela-Lema
{"title":"[Perception of cannabis use in the adolescent population: metasynthesis of qualitative studies].","authors":"Julia Rey-Brandariz, Ana Teijeiro, Mónica Pérez-Ríos, Cristina Candal-Pedreira, Andrea Vila Fariñas, Nerea Mourino, Beatriz Casal Acción, Leonor Varela-Lema","doi":"10.1016/j.gaceta.2024.102410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the perceptions and beliefs of adolescents about cannabis consumption, studying the incentive and disincentive factors for consumption.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic review of the literature was carried out following the PRISMA guidelines. MedLine, Embase, APA PsycInfo, Cochrane and Web of Science were searched using controlled vocabulary and free terms. We included qualitative studies published between 2000 and 2024 that assessed the perceptions of adolescents aged 10 to 19 years on the use, effects, risks of using cannabis or cannabis with other legal drugs. The quality of the studies was assessed using the CASP tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3665 articles identified in the initial search, 22 complied with elegibility criteria. Data extraction yielded a series of three lines of argument linked to cannabis use: reasons for use, reasons for not using and perceived effects. The most common discourse among adolescents was related to the feeling of social and emotional well-being, fewer adverse effects than drugs, and the influence of peers on consumption.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The review preformed reports on the reasons that adolescents allege for cannabis use and reasons for abstention with a view of the preponderance of benefits over harms. It is considered that this information may be necessary for the development of prevention programmes with the dissemination of information on the effects of consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":94017,"journal":{"name":"Gaceta sanitaria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaceta sanitaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2024.102410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the perceptions and beliefs of adolescents about cannabis consumption, studying the incentive and disincentive factors for consumption.

Method: A systematic review of the literature was carried out following the PRISMA guidelines. MedLine, Embase, APA PsycInfo, Cochrane and Web of Science were searched using controlled vocabulary and free terms. We included qualitative studies published between 2000 and 2024 that assessed the perceptions of adolescents aged 10 to 19 years on the use, effects, risks of using cannabis or cannabis with other legal drugs. The quality of the studies was assessed using the CASP tool.

Results: Of the 3665 articles identified in the initial search, 22 complied with elegibility criteria. Data extraction yielded a series of three lines of argument linked to cannabis use: reasons for use, reasons for not using and perceived effects. The most common discourse among adolescents was related to the feeling of social and emotional well-being, fewer adverse effects than drugs, and the influence of peers on consumption.

Conclusions: The review preformed reports on the reasons that adolescents allege for cannabis use and reasons for abstention with a view of the preponderance of benefits over harms. It is considered that this information may be necessary for the development of prevention programmes with the dissemination of information on the effects of consumption.

[青少年对使用大麻的看法:定性研究综述]。
目的评估青少年对消费大麻的看法和信念,研究消费大麻的诱因和抑制因素:按照 PRISMA 准则对文献进行了系统性审查。使用控制词汇和自由词对 MedLine、Embase、APA PsycInfo、Cochrane 和 Web of Science 进行了检索。我们纳入了 2000 至 2024 年间发表的定性研究,这些研究评估了 10 至 19 岁青少年对使用大麻或大麻与其他合法药物混合使用的看法、影响和风险。研究质量采用 CASP 工具进行评估:在初步搜索确定的 3665 篇文章中,有 22 篇符合优雅标准。数据提取得出了与大麻使用相关的三个论点:使用原因、不使用原因和感知效果。青少年中最常见的论述与社会和情感幸福感、比毒品更少的不良影响以及同龄人对消费的影响有关:审查报告对青少年声称使用大麻的原因和不吸食大麻的原因进行了初步报告,认为大麻的益处大于危害。据认为,这些信息对于制定预防方案,传播有关消费影响的信息可能是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信