Deep learning classification performance for diagnosing condylar osteoarthritis in patients with dentofacial deformities using panoramic temporomandibular joint projection images.
{"title":"Deep learning classification performance for diagnosing condylar osteoarthritis in patients with dentofacial deformities using panoramic temporomandibular joint projection images.","authors":"Yukiko Iwase, Tomoya Sugiki, Yoshitaka Kise, Masako Nishiyama, Michihito Nozawa, Motoki Fukuda, Yoshiko Ariji, Eiichiro Ariji","doi":"10.1007/s11282-024-00768-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study aimed to assess the consistencies and performances of deep learning (DL) models in the diagnosis of condylar osteoarthritis (OA) among patients with dentofacial deformities using panoramic temporomandibular joint (TMJ) projection images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 68 TMJs with or without condylar OA in dentofacial deformity patients were tested to verify the consistencies and performances of DL models created using 252 TMJs with or without OA in TMJ disorder and dentofacial deformity patients; these models were used to diagnose OA on conventional panoramic (Con-Pa) images and open (Open-TMJ) and closed (Closed-TMJ) mouth TMJ projection images. The GoogLeNet and VGG-16 networks were used to create the DL models. For comparison, two dental residents with < 1 year of experience interpreting radiographs evaluated the same condyle data that had been used to test the DL models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On Open-TMJ images, the DL models showed moderate to very good consistency, whereas the residents' demonstrated fair consistency on all images. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of both DL models on Con-Pa (0.84 for GoogLeNet and 0.75 for VGG-16) and Open-TMJ images (0.89 for both models) were significantly higher than the residents' AUCs (p < 0.01). The AUCs of the DL models on Open-TMJ images (0.89 for both models) were higher than the AUCs on Closed-TMJ images (0.72 for both models).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DL models created in this study could help residents to interpret Con-Pa and Open-TMJ images in the diagnosis of condylar OA.</p>","PeriodicalId":56103,"journal":{"name":"Oral Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"538-545"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-024-00768-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The present study aimed to assess the consistencies and performances of deep learning (DL) models in the diagnosis of condylar osteoarthritis (OA) among patients with dentofacial deformities using panoramic temporomandibular joint (TMJ) projection images.
Methods: A total of 68 TMJs with or without condylar OA in dentofacial deformity patients were tested to verify the consistencies and performances of DL models created using 252 TMJs with or without OA in TMJ disorder and dentofacial deformity patients; these models were used to diagnose OA on conventional panoramic (Con-Pa) images and open (Open-TMJ) and closed (Closed-TMJ) mouth TMJ projection images. The GoogLeNet and VGG-16 networks were used to create the DL models. For comparison, two dental residents with < 1 year of experience interpreting radiographs evaluated the same condyle data that had been used to test the DL models.
Results: On Open-TMJ images, the DL models showed moderate to very good consistency, whereas the residents' demonstrated fair consistency on all images. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of both DL models on Con-Pa (0.84 for GoogLeNet and 0.75 for VGG-16) and Open-TMJ images (0.89 for both models) were significantly higher than the residents' AUCs (p < 0.01). The AUCs of the DL models on Open-TMJ images (0.89 for both models) were higher than the AUCs on Closed-TMJ images (0.72 for both models).
Conclusions: The DL models created in this study could help residents to interpret Con-Pa and Open-TMJ images in the diagnosis of condylar OA.
期刊介绍:
As the official English-language journal of the Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and the Asian Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Oral Radiology is intended to be a forum for international collaboration in head and neck diagnostic imaging and all related fields. Oral Radiology features cutting-edge research papers, review articles, case reports, and technical notes from both the clinical and experimental fields. As membership in the Society is not a prerequisite, contributions are welcome from researchers and clinicians worldwide.