Masking ability of gingiva-colored resin-based composites over different tooth-colored substrates.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Odontology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1007/s10266-024-00966-6
Nazmiye Şen, Erkan Sancaklı
{"title":"Masking ability of gingiva-colored resin-based composites over different tooth-colored substrates.","authors":"Nazmiye Şen, Erkan Sancaklı","doi":"10.1007/s10266-024-00966-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of the study was to investigate the influence of different tooth-colored substrates and restoration thicknesses on the final color of gingiva-colored resin-based composites (GCRBCs). Five different shades of GCRBCs [light pink (LP), dark pink (DP), orange (Or), brown (Br), and purple (P)] were used to prepare disc-shaped specimens with 2 different thicknesses: 1.0 mm, and 2.0 mm. GCRBC discs (n = 5) were placed over 3 different tooth-colored substrates (ND1, ND5, and ND9) and color parameters were assessed using a spectroradiometer. Color differences (∆E*<sub>ab</sub> and ∆E<sub>00</sub>) were calculated using CIELab and CIEDE2000 formulas and compared to 50:50% perceptibility (PT: ∆E*<sub>ab</sub> = 1.7, ΔE<sub>00</sub> = 1.1) and acceptability (AT: ∆E*<sub>ab</sub> = 3.7, ΔE<sub>00</sub> = 2.8) visual thresholds. Color variation data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVAs followed by Bonferroni's post hoc tests (a = 05). The ∆E*<sub>ab</sub> and ΔE<sub>00</sub> values of GCRBCs placed over ND9 substrates were significantly higher in the LP-1.0 mm and Or-1.0 mm groups that presented values above AT (p< .001).Regardless of the substrate color and GCRBC thickness applied, ∆E*<sub>ab</sub> and ΔE<sub>00</sub> values below AT were recorded in the gingival color groups of P. Substrate color significantly affected the color differences in the gingival color groups of LP, DP, and Or with a restoration thickness of 1.0 mm (p < .05). Gingival color, restoration thickness, and substrate color influenced the color differences of GCRBCs. When the gingival color was a lighter gingival color, rather than dark purple, the masking ability was decreased, especially with a restoration thickness of 1.0 mm.</p>","PeriodicalId":19390,"journal":{"name":"Odontology","volume":" ","pages":"245-251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11717852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Odontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-024-00966-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate the influence of different tooth-colored substrates and restoration thicknesses on the final color of gingiva-colored resin-based composites (GCRBCs). Five different shades of GCRBCs [light pink (LP), dark pink (DP), orange (Or), brown (Br), and purple (P)] were used to prepare disc-shaped specimens with 2 different thicknesses: 1.0 mm, and 2.0 mm. GCRBC discs (n = 5) were placed over 3 different tooth-colored substrates (ND1, ND5, and ND9) and color parameters were assessed using a spectroradiometer. Color differences (∆E*ab and ∆E00) were calculated using CIELab and CIEDE2000 formulas and compared to 50:50% perceptibility (PT: ∆E*ab = 1.7, ΔE00 = 1.1) and acceptability (AT: ∆E*ab = 3.7, ΔE00 = 2.8) visual thresholds. Color variation data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVAs followed by Bonferroni's post hoc tests (a = 05). The ∆E*ab and ΔE00 values of GCRBCs placed over ND9 substrates were significantly higher in the LP-1.0 mm and Or-1.0 mm groups that presented values above AT (p< .001).Regardless of the substrate color and GCRBC thickness applied, ∆E*ab and ΔE00 values below AT were recorded in the gingival color groups of P. Substrate color significantly affected the color differences in the gingival color groups of LP, DP, and Or with a restoration thickness of 1.0 mm (p < .05). Gingival color, restoration thickness, and substrate color influenced the color differences of GCRBCs. When the gingival color was a lighter gingival color, rather than dark purple, the masking ability was decreased, especially with a restoration thickness of 1.0 mm.

Abstract Image

牙龈色树脂基复合材料对不同牙色基底的遮盖能力。
本研究旨在探讨不同牙色基底和修复体厚度对牙龈着色树脂基复合材料(GCRBCs)最终颜色的影响。研究人员使用五种不同色调的 GCRBC(浅粉色 (LP)、深粉色 (DP)、橙色 (Or)、棕色 (Br) 和紫色 (P))制备了两种不同厚度的圆盘状试样:1.0 毫米和 2.0 毫米。将 GCRBC 圆片(n = 5)置于 3 种不同的牙色基底(ND1、ND5 和 ND9)上,使用分光辐射计评估颜色参数。使用 CIELab 和 CIEDE2000 公式计算色差(ΔE*ab 和 ΔE00),并与 50:50% 的可感度(PT:ΔE*ab = 1.7,ΔE00 = 1.1)和可接受性(AT:ΔE*ab = 3.7,ΔE00 = 2.8)视觉阈值进行比较。颜色变化数据采用双向方差分析进行统计分析,然后进行 Bonferroni 后检验(a = 05)。放置在 ND9 基底上的 GCRBC 的 ΔE*ab 和 ΔE00 值在 LP-1.0 mm 和 Or-1.0 mm 组中明显较高,其值高于 AT(P 的牙龈颜色组中记录的 pab 和 ΔE00 值低于 AT)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Odontology
Odontology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal Odontology covers all disciplines involved in the fields of dentistry and craniofacial research, including molecular studies related to oral health and disease. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics ranging from research on human dental pulp, to comparisons of analgesics in surgery, to analysis of biofilm properties of dental plaque.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信