Avi A Gajjar, Michael M Covell, Rohit Prem Kumar, Oliver Y Tang, Sruthi Ranganathan, Logan Muzyka, William Mualem, Inaya Rehman, Shrey V Patel, Raj Swaroop Lavadi, Rida Mitha, Bryan A Lieber, D Kojo Hamilton, Nitin Agarwal
{"title":"Evidence Against a Traumatic Brain Injury \"July Effect\": An Analysis of 3 160 452 Patients From the National Inpatient Sample.","authors":"Avi A Gajjar, Michael M Covell, Rohit Prem Kumar, Oliver Y Tang, Sruthi Ranganathan, Logan Muzyka, William Mualem, Inaya Rehman, Shrey V Patel, Raj Swaroop Lavadi, Rida Mitha, Bryan A Lieber, D Kojo Hamilton, Nitin Agarwal","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The \"July Effect\" hypothesizes increased morbidity and mortality after the addition of inexperienced physicians at the beginning of an academic year. However, the impact of newer members on neurosurgical teams managing patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) has yet to be examined. This study conducted a nationwide analysis to evaluate the existence of the \"July Effect\" in the setting of patients with TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Central Distributor's National Inpatient Sample data set was queried for patients with TBI using International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 and ICD-10 codes. Discharges were included for diagnoses of traumatic epidural, subdural, or subarachnoid hemorrhages. Only patients treated at teaching hospitals were included to ensure resident involvement in care. Patients were grouped into July admission and non-July admission cohorts. A subgroup of patients with neurotrauma undergoing any form of cranial surgery was created. Perioperative variables were recorded. Rates of different complications were assayed. Groups were compared using χ 2 tests (qualitative variables) and t -tests or Mann-Whitney U -tests (quantitative variables). Logistic regression was used for binary variables. Gamma log-linked regression was used for continuous variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The National Inpatient Sample database yielded a weighted average of 3 160 452 patients, of which 312 863 (9.9%) underwent surgical management. Patients admitted to the hospital in July had a 5% decreased likelihood of death ( P = .027), and a 5.83% decreased likelihood of developing a complication ( P < .001) compared with other months of the year. July admittance to a hospital showed no significant impact on mean length of stay ( P = .392) or routine discharge ( P = .147). Among patients with TBI who received surgical intervention, July admittance did not significantly affect the likelihood of death ( P = .053), developing a complication ( P = .477), routine discharge ( P = .986), or mean length of stay ( P = .385).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggested that there is no \"July Effect\" on patients with TBI treated at teaching hospitals in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"447-453"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003099","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: The "July Effect" hypothesizes increased morbidity and mortality after the addition of inexperienced physicians at the beginning of an academic year. However, the impact of newer members on neurosurgical teams managing patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) has yet to be examined. This study conducted a nationwide analysis to evaluate the existence of the "July Effect" in the setting of patients with TBI.
Methods: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Central Distributor's National Inpatient Sample data set was queried for patients with TBI using International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 and ICD-10 codes. Discharges were included for diagnoses of traumatic epidural, subdural, or subarachnoid hemorrhages. Only patients treated at teaching hospitals were included to ensure resident involvement in care. Patients were grouped into July admission and non-July admission cohorts. A subgroup of patients with neurotrauma undergoing any form of cranial surgery was created. Perioperative variables were recorded. Rates of different complications were assayed. Groups were compared using χ 2 tests (qualitative variables) and t -tests or Mann-Whitney U -tests (quantitative variables). Logistic regression was used for binary variables. Gamma log-linked regression was used for continuous variables.
Results: The National Inpatient Sample database yielded a weighted average of 3 160 452 patients, of which 312 863 (9.9%) underwent surgical management. Patients admitted to the hospital in July had a 5% decreased likelihood of death ( P = .027), and a 5.83% decreased likelihood of developing a complication ( P < .001) compared with other months of the year. July admittance to a hospital showed no significant impact on mean length of stay ( P = .392) or routine discharge ( P = .147). Among patients with TBI who received surgical intervention, July admittance did not significantly affect the likelihood of death ( P = .053), developing a complication ( P = .477), routine discharge ( P = .986), or mean length of stay ( P = .385).
Conclusion: The findings suggested that there is no "July Effect" on patients with TBI treated at teaching hospitals in the United States.
期刊介绍:
Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery.
Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.