Reducing exposure levels of immersion washing workers to ortho-phthalaldehyde by improving exhaust systems.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Shinobu Yamamoto, Yuriko Hachiya, Motohide Goto, Akito Takeuchi, Toru Ishidao, Hajime Hori, Hiroyuki Miyauchi
{"title":"Reducing exposure levels of immersion washing workers to ortho-phthalaldehyde by improving exhaust systems.","authors":"Shinobu Yamamoto, Yuriko Hachiya, Motohide Goto, Akito Takeuchi, Toru Ishidao, Hajime Hori, Hiroyuki Miyauchi","doi":"10.1093/joccuh/uiae033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists recommends a threshold limit value-ceiling (TLV-C) of 0.1 ppb for occupational exposure to ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA) used in washing endoscope probes. To adhere to this extremely low exposure limit, this case study aimed to reduce OPA exposure concentrations of workers during immersion washing of an endoscope probe body. This was achieved by attaching a new duct and hood to the existing ceiling exhaust system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The type of hood was determined by calculating and comparing the capture velocity obtained by assuming either an exterior or an enclosing hood. Additionally, the effect on improving the working environment was tested before and after the installation of the hood by measuring the OPA vapor concentration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The calculated capture velocities of the exterior and enclosing hoods were 0.05 m/s and 0.19 m/s, respectively. Considering the operability, the exterior hood was more appropriate; however, the calculated capture velocity indicated potential inadequacy in meeting the TLV-C requirement, leading to the adoption of the enclosing hood. The OPA vapor concentration in ceiling value measurements taken after the enclosing hood was fitted was reduced to 0.2 ppb, that is, 1/10 of the original concentration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the environmental concentration after the improvement still exceeded the TLV-C of 0.1 ppb, this study's findings indicate that even substances with extremely low occupational exposure limits can be managed with appropriate local exhaust ventilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11360290/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiae033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists recommends a threshold limit value-ceiling (TLV-C) of 0.1 ppb for occupational exposure to ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA) used in washing endoscope probes. To adhere to this extremely low exposure limit, this case study aimed to reduce OPA exposure concentrations of workers during immersion washing of an endoscope probe body. This was achieved by attaching a new duct and hood to the existing ceiling exhaust system.

Methods: The type of hood was determined by calculating and comparing the capture velocity obtained by assuming either an exterior or an enclosing hood. Additionally, the effect on improving the working environment was tested before and after the installation of the hood by measuring the OPA vapor concentration.

Results: The calculated capture velocities of the exterior and enclosing hoods were 0.05 m/s and 0.19 m/s, respectively. Considering the operability, the exterior hood was more appropriate; however, the calculated capture velocity indicated potential inadequacy in meeting the TLV-C requirement, leading to the adoption of the enclosing hood. The OPA vapor concentration in ceiling value measurements taken after the enclosing hood was fitted was reduced to 0.2 ppb, that is, 1/10 of the original concentration.

Conclusions: Although the environmental concentration after the improvement still exceeded the TLV-C of 0.1 ppb, this study's findings indicate that even substances with extremely low occupational exposure limits can be managed with appropriate local exhaust ventilation.

通过改进排气系统,降低浸泡清洗工人接触邻苯二甲醛的水平。
目标:关于清洗内窥镜探头时使用的邻苯二甲醛(OPA)的职业暴露,美国政府工业卫生学家会议建议将阈限值-上限(TLV-C)定为 0.1 ppb。为了遵守这一极低的暴露限值,本案例研究旨在降低工人在浸泡清洗内窥镜探头体时的 OPA 暴露浓度。方法是在现有的天花板排气系统上安装新的管道和罩:方法:通过计算和比较假设采用外部或封闭式集气罩所获得的捕获速度,确定集气罩的类型。此外,通过测量 OPA 蒸汽浓度,测试了安装集气罩前后对改善工作环境的影响:结果:计算得出的外部罩和封闭罩的捕获速度分别为 0.05 米/秒和 0.19 米/秒。考虑到可操作性,外部罩更为合适;然而,计算得出的捕获速度表明可能无法满足 TLV-C 的要求,因此采用了封闭罩。采用密闭式集气罩后,天花板值测量中的 OPA 蒸汽浓度降低到 0.2 ppb,是原来浓度的 1/10:尽管改进后的环境浓度仍然超过了 TLV-C 的 0.1 ppb,但本研究的结果表明,即使是职业接触限值极低的物质,也可以通过适当的局部排气通风进行管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational Health
Journal of Occupational Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the journal is broad, covering toxicology, ergonomics, psychosocial factors and other relevant health issues of workers, with special emphasis on the current developments in occupational health. The JOH also accepts various methodologies that are relevant to investigation of occupational health risk factors and exposures, such as large-scale epidemiological studies, human studies employing biological techniques and fundamental experiments on animals, and also welcomes submissions concerning occupational health practices and related issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信