Cognitive profile of kidney transplant patients and impact of deceased vs. living donor transplantation.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Johanna Marie Doerr, Martin Juenemann, Anna Becker, Christian Nahrgang, Lucy Rainer, Juliane Liese, Andreas Hecker, Martin Wolter, Rolf Weimer, Hristos Karakizlis
{"title":"Cognitive profile of kidney transplant patients and impact of deceased vs. living donor transplantation.","authors":"Johanna Marie Doerr, Martin Juenemann, Anna Becker, Christian Nahrgang, Lucy Rainer, Juliane Liese, Andreas Hecker, Martin Wolter, Rolf Weimer, Hristos Karakizlis","doi":"10.1007/s40620-024-02004-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is important to learn more about the prevalence, severity and characteristics (i.e., which cognitive abilities are especially affected) of cognitive impairment in kidney transplant patients. Furthermore, the impact of living vs. deceased donor renal transplantation on cognitive outcome in this patient group needs further studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-nine patients (43 men, age 55 ± 13 years) who received a deceased donor or living donor kidney transplant, completed a comprehensive neuropsychological test assessment. Neuropsychological tests explored the cognitive domains of verbal and visual memory, attention, and executive functions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen percent  of the patients had mild, 25% moderate, and 15% severe cognitive impairment. The level of domain-specific cognitive deficit differed between verbal memory, attention, and executive functions (χ<sup>2</sup>(2) = 7.11, p = 0.029). On average, patients showed the highest deficit in executive functions, and the lowest deficit in verbal memory. Patients who received a kidney graft from a deceased donor were more likely to have a cognitive impairment than those who received a kidney graft from a living donor (OR = 3.03, 95% CI [0.99,9.32], Wald χ<sup>2</sup><sub>(1)</sub> = 3.74, p = 0.053). This effect was independent of time on dialysis as well as of creatinine levels, or creatinine clearance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results show that in kidney transplant patients with cognitive impairment, the cognitive domain of executive functions is the most affected one. This might be detrimental for quality of life. The fact that patients who received living donor kidneys seem to do better in terms of cognition than patients with deceased donor kidneys deserves more attention in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":16542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nephrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-024-02004-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is important to learn more about the prevalence, severity and characteristics (i.e., which cognitive abilities are especially affected) of cognitive impairment in kidney transplant patients. Furthermore, the impact of living vs. deceased donor renal transplantation on cognitive outcome in this patient group needs further studies.

Methods: Fifty-nine patients (43 men, age 55 ± 13 years) who received a deceased donor or living donor kidney transplant, completed a comprehensive neuropsychological test assessment. Neuropsychological tests explored the cognitive domains of verbal and visual memory, attention, and executive functions.

Results: Fifteen percent  of the patients had mild, 25% moderate, and 15% severe cognitive impairment. The level of domain-specific cognitive deficit differed between verbal memory, attention, and executive functions (χ2(2) = 7.11, p = 0.029). On average, patients showed the highest deficit in executive functions, and the lowest deficit in verbal memory. Patients who received a kidney graft from a deceased donor were more likely to have a cognitive impairment than those who received a kidney graft from a living donor (OR = 3.03, 95% CI [0.99,9.32], Wald χ2(1) = 3.74, p = 0.053). This effect was independent of time on dialysis as well as of creatinine levels, or creatinine clearance.

Conclusions: Our results show that in kidney transplant patients with cognitive impairment, the cognitive domain of executive functions is the most affected one. This might be detrimental for quality of life. The fact that patients who received living donor kidneys seem to do better in terms of cognition than patients with deceased donor kidneys deserves more attention in future research.

Abstract Image

肾移植患者的认知概况以及死亡捐献者与活体捐献者移植的影响。
背景:了解肾移植患者认知障碍的发生率、严重程度和特征(即哪些认知能力尤其受到影响)非常重要。此外,活体与死体肾移植对这一患者群体认知结果的影响也需要进一步研究:59名接受过死亡供体或活体肾移植的患者(43名男性,年龄55±13岁)完成了全面的神经心理学测试评估。神经心理学测试探讨了语言和视觉记忆、注意力和执行功能等认知领域:结果:15%的患者有轻度认知障碍,25%的患者有中度认知障碍,15%的患者有重度认知障碍。言语记忆、注意力和执行功能的特定领域认知障碍程度不同(χ2(2) = 7.11,P = 0.029)。平均而言,患者在执行功能方面的缺陷最大,而在言语记忆方面的缺陷最小。与接受活体肾脏移植的患者相比,接受已故捐赠者肾脏移植的患者更有可能出现认知功能障碍(OR = 3.03,95% CI [0.99,9.32],Wald χ2(1) = 3.74,p = 0.053)。这种影响与透析时间、肌酐水平或肌酐清除率无关:我们的研究结果表明,在患有认知障碍的肾移植患者中,执行功能这一认知领域受到的影响最大。这可能会影响生活质量。接受活体肾脏捐献的患者在认知方面的表现似乎优于接受已故肾脏捐献的患者,这一事实值得在今后的研究中给予更多关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nephrology
Journal of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nephrology is a bimonthly journal that considers publication of peer reviewed original manuscripts dealing with both clinical and laboratory investigations of relevance to the broad fields of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation. It is the Official Journal of the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信