Spinal loads during dynamic full flexion and return to standing posture in different age and sex groups: A musculoskeletal model study

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Rizwan Arshad , Kodjo Moglo , Marwan El-Rich , Hendrik Schmidt
{"title":"Spinal loads during dynamic full flexion and return to standing posture in different age and sex groups: A musculoskeletal model study","authors":"Rizwan Arshad ,&nbsp;Kodjo Moglo ,&nbsp;Marwan El-Rich ,&nbsp;Hendrik Schmidt","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>During forward flexion, spine motion varies due to age and sex differences. Previous studies showed that lumbar/pelvis range of flexion (RoF) and lumbo-pelvic ratio (L/P) are age/sex dependent. How variation of these parameters affects lumbar loading in a normal population requires further assessment. We aimed to estimate lumbar loads during dynamic flexion-return cycle and the differences in peak loads (compression) and corresponding trunk inclinations due to variation in lumbar/pelvis RoF and L/P.</p><p>Based on <em>in vivo</em> L/P (0.11–3.44), temporal phases of flexion (early, middle, and later), the lumbar (45-55°) and hip (60-79°) RoF; full flexion-return cycles of six seconds were reconstructed for three age groups (20–35, 36–50 and 50+ yrs.) in both sexes. Six inverse dynamic analyses were performed with a 50<sup>th</sup> percentile model, and differences in peak loads and corresponding trunk inclinations were calculated.</p><p>Peak loads at L4-L5 were 179 N higher in younger males versus females, but 228 N and 210 N lower in middle-aged and older males, respectively, compared to females. Females exhibited higher trunk inclinations (6°-20°) than males across all age groups. Age related differences in L4-L5 peak loads and corresponding trunk inclinations were found up to 415 N and 19° in males and 152 N and 13° in females. With aging, peak loads were reduced in males but were found non-monotonic in females, whereas trunk inclinations at peak loads were reduced in both sexes from young to middle/old age groups.</p><p>In conclusion, lumbar loading and corresponding trunk inclinations varied notably due to age/sex differences. Such data may help distinguishing normal or pathological condition of the lumbar spine.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929024003014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During forward flexion, spine motion varies due to age and sex differences. Previous studies showed that lumbar/pelvis range of flexion (RoF) and lumbo-pelvic ratio (L/P) are age/sex dependent. How variation of these parameters affects lumbar loading in a normal population requires further assessment. We aimed to estimate lumbar loads during dynamic flexion-return cycle and the differences in peak loads (compression) and corresponding trunk inclinations due to variation in lumbar/pelvis RoF and L/P.

Based on in vivo L/P (0.11–3.44), temporal phases of flexion (early, middle, and later), the lumbar (45-55°) and hip (60-79°) RoF; full flexion-return cycles of six seconds were reconstructed for three age groups (20–35, 36–50 and 50+ yrs.) in both sexes. Six inverse dynamic analyses were performed with a 50th percentile model, and differences in peak loads and corresponding trunk inclinations were calculated.

Peak loads at L4-L5 were 179 N higher in younger males versus females, but 228 N and 210 N lower in middle-aged and older males, respectively, compared to females. Females exhibited higher trunk inclinations (6°-20°) than males across all age groups. Age related differences in L4-L5 peak loads and corresponding trunk inclinations were found up to 415 N and 19° in males and 152 N and 13° in females. With aging, peak loads were reduced in males but were found non-monotonic in females, whereas trunk inclinations at peak loads were reduced in both sexes from young to middle/old age groups.

In conclusion, lumbar loading and corresponding trunk inclinations varied notably due to age/sex differences. Such data may help distinguishing normal or pathological condition of the lumbar spine.

不同年龄和性别群体在动态完全屈曲和恢复站立姿势时的脊柱负荷:肌肉骨骼模型研究。
在前屈时,脊柱的运动因年龄和性别差异而不同。以往的研究表明,腰椎/骨盆屈曲范围(RoF)和腰椎/骨盆比率(L/P)与年龄/性别有关。这些参数的变化如何影响正常人群的腰部负荷需要进一步评估。我们的目的是估算动态屈-回循环过程中的腰部负荷,以及腰/骨盆RoF和L/P的变化导致的峰值负荷(压缩)和相应躯干倾斜度的差异。根据体内 L/P(0.11-3.44)、屈曲的时间阶段(早期、中期和后期)、腰椎(45-55°)和髋关节(60-79°)RoF;重建了三个年龄组(20-35 岁、36-50 岁和 50 岁以上)男女的 6 秒钟完整屈曲-返回周期。使用第 50 百分位数模型进行了六次反向动态分析,并计算了峰值负荷和相应躯干倾斜度的差异。与女性相比,年轻男性在 L4-L5 处的峰值负荷高出 179 N,但中年男性和老年男性分别低 228 N 和 210 N。在所有年龄组中,女性的躯干倾斜度(6°-20°)均高于男性。与年龄有关的 L4-L5 峰值负荷和相应的躯干倾斜度的差异在男性中最高为 415 牛顿和 19°,在女性中最高为 152 牛顿和 13°。随着年龄的增长,男性的峰值负荷有所降低,但女性的峰值负荷并不单调,而从年轻到中/老年年龄组,两性在峰值负荷时的躯干倾斜度都有所降低。总之,腰部负荷和相应的躯干倾斜度因年龄/性别差异而明显不同。这些数据有助于区分腰椎的正常或病理状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信