Comparison of stent patency between EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging and endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage for hilar obstruction.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2024-07-10 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2333-7898
Kotaro Takeshita, Susumu Hijioka, Yoshikuni Nagashio, Yuta Maruki, Akihiro Ohba, Yuki Kawasaki, Tetsuro Takasaki, Shin Yagi, Daiki Agarie, Hidenobu Hara, Yuya Hagiwara, Daiki Yamashige, Kohei Okamoto, Soma Fukuda, Masaru Kuwada, Mark Chatto, Shunsuke Kondo, Chigusa Morizane, Hideki Ueno, Yutaka Saito, Takuji Okusaka
{"title":"Comparison of stent patency between EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging and endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage for hilar obstruction.","authors":"Kotaro Takeshita, Susumu Hijioka, Yoshikuni Nagashio, Yuta Maruki, Akihiro Ohba, Yuki Kawasaki, Tetsuro Takasaki, Shin Yagi, Daiki Agarie, Hidenobu Hara, Yuya Hagiwara, Daiki Yamashige, Kohei Okamoto, Soma Fukuda, Masaru Kuwada, Mark Chatto, Shunsuke Kondo, Chigusa Morizane, Hideki Ueno, Yutaka Saito, Takuji Okusaka","doi":"10.1055/a-2333-7898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging between the left and right bile ducts is an alternative to endoscopic transpapillary drainage for malignant hilar biliary obstruction. We aimed to analyze the long-term stent patency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging. <b>Patients and methods</b> Patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging between April 2018 and July 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. We retrospectively compared the stent patency of these patients with that of the individuals who underwent endoscopic transpapillary drainage-multi-stenting using unmatched (entire) and propensity score-matched cohorts. <b>Results</b> Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging had a technical success rate of 90% (18/20). Adverse events were minimal. The number of clinical success cases was 17 and 82 for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging using metallic stent and endoscopic transpapillary drainage-multi-stenting, respectively. The recurrent biliary obstruction rate was 17.6% and 58.5% for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging and endoscopic transpapillary drainage-multi-stenting, respectively; the median time to recurrent biliary obstruction (days) was significantly longer for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging in the entire (not reached vs. 104, <i>P</i> =0.03) and propensity score-matched (183 vs. 79, <i>P</i> =0.05) cohorts. The non-recurrent biliary obstruction rate for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging was 91.6% at 3 and 6 months and 57% at 12 months. Multivariate analyses revealed that endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging contributed to a lower recurrent biliary obstruction incidence (hazard ratio, 0.31, <i>P</i> =0.05) without significant difference. <b>Conclusions</b> Stent patency was significantly better for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging. However, future prospective studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 7","pages":"E875-E886"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11236478/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2333-7898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging between the left and right bile ducts is an alternative to endoscopic transpapillary drainage for malignant hilar biliary obstruction. We aimed to analyze the long-term stent patency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging. Patients and methods Patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging between April 2018 and July 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. We retrospectively compared the stent patency of these patients with that of the individuals who underwent endoscopic transpapillary drainage-multi-stenting using unmatched (entire) and propensity score-matched cohorts. Results Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging had a technical success rate of 90% (18/20). Adverse events were minimal. The number of clinical success cases was 17 and 82 for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging using metallic stent and endoscopic transpapillary drainage-multi-stenting, respectively. The recurrent biliary obstruction rate was 17.6% and 58.5% for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging and endoscopic transpapillary drainage-multi-stenting, respectively; the median time to recurrent biliary obstruction (days) was significantly longer for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging in the entire (not reached vs. 104, P =0.03) and propensity score-matched (183 vs. 79, P =0.05) cohorts. The non-recurrent biliary obstruction rate for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging was 91.6% at 3 and 6 months and 57% at 12 months. Multivariate analyses revealed that endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging contributed to a lower recurrent biliary obstruction incidence (hazard ratio, 0.31, P =0.05) without significant difference. Conclusions Stent patency was significantly better for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with bridging. However, future prospective studies are needed.

在 EUS 引导下进行肝胃桥接造口术与内镜下经腹腔胆道引流术治疗肝门梗阻的支架通畅率比较。
背景和研究目的 在超声引导下进行肝胃造口术并在左右胆管之间架桥,是内镜下经胆管引流术治疗恶性肝门胆道梗阻的一种替代方法。我们旨在分析内镜超声引导肝胃造口术与桥接术的长期支架通畅性。患者和方法 回顾性分析了 2018 年 4 月至 2023 年 7 月间接受内镜超声引导肝胃造口术加桥接的患者。我们采用非匹配(整体)和倾向得分匹配队列,回顾性比较了这些患者与接受内镜下经肝门引流多支架置入术的患者的支架通畅率。结果 内镜超声引导肝胃造口术加桥接的技术成功率为 90%(18/20)。不良事件极少。使用金属支架的内镜超声引导肝胃吻合术和内镜下经肾盂引流-多支架植入术的临床成功病例数分别为17例和82例。内镜超声引导下肝胃切除术加金属支架桥接术和内镜下经毛细血管引流-多支架置入术的胆道梗阻复发率分别为17.6%和58.5%;内镜超声引导下肝胃切除术加金属支架桥接术的胆道梗阻复发中位时间(天数)明显长于金属支架桥接术(未达到与内镜下经毛细血管引流-多支架置入术)(P=0.03);内镜超声引导下肝胃切除术加金属支架桥接术的胆道梗阻复发中位时间(天数)明显短于金属支架桥接术(P=0.05)。104,P =0.03)和倾向评分匹配队列(183 vs. 79,P =0.05)。3个月和6个月时,内镜超声引导肝胃造口术加桥术的非复发性胆道梗阻率为91.6%,12个月时为57%。多变量分析显示,内镜超声引导下肝胃切除术加桥接术降低了复发性胆道梗阻的发生率(危险比为0.31,P=0.05),但无显著差异。结论 在内镜超声引导下行肝胃桥接造口术的支架通畅率明显更高。不过,今后还需要进行前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信