Multicenter Study on Physician-Modified Endografts for Thoracoabdominal and Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

IF 5.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Energy & Fuels Pub Date : 2024-10-22 Epub Date: 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.068587
Nikolaos Tsilimparis, Ryan Gouveia E Melo, Emanuel R Tenorio, Salvatore Scali, Bernardo Mendes, Sukgu Han, Marc Schermerhorn, Donald J Adam, Mahmoud B Malas, Mark Farber, Tilo Kölbel, Benjamin Starnes, George Joseph, Daniela Branzan, Frederic Cochennec, Carlos Timaran, Luca Bertoglio, Enrico Cieri, Luís Mendes Pedro, Fabio Verzini, Adam W Beck, Jesse Chait, Alyssa Pyun, Gregory A Magee, Nicholas Swerdlow, Maciej Juszczak, Andrew Barleben, Rohini Patel, Vivian C Gomes, Giuseppe Panuccio, Matthew P Sweet, Sara L Zettervall, Jean-Pierre Becquemin, Jennifer Canonge, Jésus Porras-Colón, Marina Dias-Neto, Antonino Giordano, Gustavo S Oderich
{"title":"Multicenter Study on Physician-Modified Endografts for Thoracoabdominal and Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.","authors":"Nikolaos Tsilimparis, Ryan Gouveia E Melo, Emanuel R Tenorio, Salvatore Scali, Bernardo Mendes, Sukgu Han, Marc Schermerhorn, Donald J Adam, Mahmoud B Malas, Mark Farber, Tilo Kölbel, Benjamin Starnes, George Joseph, Daniela Branzan, Frederic Cochennec, Carlos Timaran, Luca Bertoglio, Enrico Cieri, Luís Mendes Pedro, Fabio Verzini, Adam W Beck, Jesse Chait, Alyssa Pyun, Gregory A Magee, Nicholas Swerdlow, Maciej Juszczak, Andrew Barleben, Rohini Patel, Vivian C Gomes, Giuseppe Panuccio, Matthew P Sweet, Sara L Zettervall, Jean-Pierre Becquemin, Jennifer Canonge, Jésus Porras-Colón, Marina Dias-Neto, Antonino Giordano, Gustavo S Oderich","doi":"10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.068587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physician modified endografts (PMEGs) have been widely used in the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysm and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, however, previous data are limited to small single center studies and robust data on safety and effectiveness of PMEGs are lacking. We aimed to perform an international multicenter study analyzing the outcomes of PMEGs in complex abdominal aortic aneurysms and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An international multicenter single-arm cohort study was performed analyzing the outcomes of PMEGs in the treatment of elective, symptomatic, and ruptured complex abdominal aortic aneurysms and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Variables and outcomes were defined according to the Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards. Device modification and procedure details were collected and analyzed. Efficacy outcomes included technical success and safety outcomes included major adverse events and 30-day mortality. Follow-up outcomes included reinterventions, endoleaks, target vessel patency rates and overall and aortic-related mortality. Multivariable analysis was performed aiming at identifying predictors of technical success, 30-day mortality, and major adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 1274 patients were included in the study from 19 centers. Median age was 74 (IQR, 68-79), and 75.7% were men; 45.7% were complex abdominal aortic aneurysms, and 54.3% were thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms; 65.5% patients presented electively, 24.6% were symptomatic, and 9.9% were ruptured. Most patients (83.1%) were submitted to a fenestrated repair, 3.6% to branched repair, and 13.4% to a combined fenestrated and branched repair. Most patients (85.8%) had ≥3 target vessels included. The overall technical success was 94% (94% in elective, 93.4% in symptomatic, and 95.1% in ruptured cases). Thirty-day mortality was 5.8% (4.1% in elective, 7.6% in symptomatic, and 12.7% in ruptured aneurysms). Major adverse events occurred in 25.2% of cases (23.1% in elective, 27.8% in symptomatic, and 30.3% in ruptured aneurysms). Median follow-up was 21 months (5.6-50.6). Freedom from reintervention was 73.8%, 61.8%, and 51.4% at 1, 3, and 5 years; primary target vessel patency was 96.9%, 93.6%, and 90.3%. Overall survival and freedom from aortic-related mortality was 82.4%/92.9%, 69.9%/91.6%, and 55.0%/89.1% at 1, 3, and 5 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PMEGs were a safe and effective treatment option for elective, symptomatic, and ruptured complex aortic aneurysms. Long-term data and future prospective studies are needed for more robust and detailed analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":35,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Fuels","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.068587","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physician modified endografts (PMEGs) have been widely used in the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysm and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, however, previous data are limited to small single center studies and robust data on safety and effectiveness of PMEGs are lacking. We aimed to perform an international multicenter study analyzing the outcomes of PMEGs in complex abdominal aortic aneurysms and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

Methods: An international multicenter single-arm cohort study was performed analyzing the outcomes of PMEGs in the treatment of elective, symptomatic, and ruptured complex abdominal aortic aneurysms and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Variables and outcomes were defined according to the Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards. Device modification and procedure details were collected and analyzed. Efficacy outcomes included technical success and safety outcomes included major adverse events and 30-day mortality. Follow-up outcomes included reinterventions, endoleaks, target vessel patency rates and overall and aortic-related mortality. Multivariable analysis was performed aiming at identifying predictors of technical success, 30-day mortality, and major adverse events.

Results: Overall, 1274 patients were included in the study from 19 centers. Median age was 74 (IQR, 68-79), and 75.7% were men; 45.7% were complex abdominal aortic aneurysms, and 54.3% were thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms; 65.5% patients presented electively, 24.6% were symptomatic, and 9.9% were ruptured. Most patients (83.1%) were submitted to a fenestrated repair, 3.6% to branched repair, and 13.4% to a combined fenestrated and branched repair. Most patients (85.8%) had ≥3 target vessels included. The overall technical success was 94% (94% in elective, 93.4% in symptomatic, and 95.1% in ruptured cases). Thirty-day mortality was 5.8% (4.1% in elective, 7.6% in symptomatic, and 12.7% in ruptured aneurysms). Major adverse events occurred in 25.2% of cases (23.1% in elective, 27.8% in symptomatic, and 30.3% in ruptured aneurysms). Median follow-up was 21 months (5.6-50.6). Freedom from reintervention was 73.8%, 61.8%, and 51.4% at 1, 3, and 5 years; primary target vessel patency was 96.9%, 93.6%, and 90.3%. Overall survival and freedom from aortic-related mortality was 82.4%/92.9%, 69.9%/91.6%, and 55.0%/89.1% at 1, 3, and 5 years.

Conclusions: PMEGs were a safe and effective treatment option for elective, symptomatic, and ruptured complex aortic aneurysms. Long-term data and future prospective studies are needed for more robust and detailed analysis.

关于胸腹和复杂腹主动脉瘤修复的医生改良内移植物的多中心研究。
背景:医生改良内植物(PMEGs)已被广泛用于复杂腹主动脉瘤和胸腹主动脉瘤的治疗,然而,以往的数据仅限于小型单中心研究,缺乏有关PMEGs安全性和有效性的可靠数据。我们旨在开展一项国际多中心研究,分析 PMEGs 在复杂腹主动脉瘤和胸腹主动脉瘤中的疗效:一项国际多中心单臂队列研究分析了PMEGs治疗择期、无症状和破裂的复杂腹主动脉瘤和胸腹主动脉瘤的疗效。变量和结果根据血管外科学会的报告标准进行定义。收集并分析了设备改造和手术细节。疗效结果包括技术成功率,安全性结果包括主要不良事件和30天死亡率。随访结果包括再介入、内膜渗漏、靶血管通畅率以及总死亡率和主动脉相关死亡率。进行了多变量分析,旨在确定技术成功率、30 天死亡率和主要不良事件的预测因素:共有来自19个中心的1274名患者参与了研究。中位年龄为 74 岁(IQR,68-79),75.7% 为男性;45.7% 为复杂性腹主动脉瘤,54.3% 为胸腹主动脉瘤;65.5% 的患者为择期手术,24.6% 为无症状,9.9% 为破裂。大多数患者(83.1%)接受了栅栏式修补术,3.6%接受了分支式修补术,13.4%接受了栅栏式和分支式联合修补术。大多数患者(85.8%)的目标血管≥3根。总体技术成功率为94%(94%为择期手术,93.4%为无症状手术,95.1%为破裂手术)。30天死亡率为5.8%(选择性4.1%,无症状7.6%,破裂动脉瘤12.7%)。25.2%的病例发生了重大不良事件(23.1%为选择性,27.8%为无症状,30.3%为动脉瘤破裂)。中位随访时间为 21 个月(5.6-50.6 个月)。1年、3年和5年内,无再介入的比例分别为73.8%、61.8%和51.4%;主要靶血管通畅率分别为96.9%、93.6%和90.3%。1年、3年和5年的总生存率和无主动脉相关死亡率分别为82.4%/92.9%、69.9%/91.6%和55.0%/89.1%:PMEG是治疗择期、无症状和破裂的复杂主动脉瘤的一种安全有效的方法。需要长期数据和未来的前瞻性研究来进行更可靠、更详细的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy & Fuels
Energy & Fuels 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.20%
发文量
1101
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Energy & Fuels publishes reports of research in the technical area defined by the intersection of the disciplines of chemistry and chemical engineering and the application domain of non-nuclear energy and fuels. This includes research directed at the formation of, exploration for, and production of fossil fuels and biomass; the properties and structure or molecular composition of both raw fuels and refined products; the chemistry involved in the processing and utilization of fuels; fuel cells and their applications; and the analytical and instrumental techniques used in investigations of the foregoing areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信