Diagnostic accuracy of OCT angiography for macular neovascularization in central serous chorioretinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Hans Christian Kiilgaard, Anne Helene Køllund Nissen, Chandrakumar Balaratnasingam, Enrico Borrelli, Mark P. Breazzano, Elon H. C. van Dijk, Mehmet Orkun Sevik, Jakob Grauslund, Yousif Subhi
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of OCT angiography for macular neovascularization in central serous chorioretinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Hans Christian Kiilgaard,&nbsp;Anne Helene Køllund Nissen,&nbsp;Chandrakumar Balaratnasingam,&nbsp;Enrico Borrelli,&nbsp;Mark P. Breazzano,&nbsp;Elon H. C. van Dijk,&nbsp;Mehmet Orkun Sevik,&nbsp;Jakob Grauslund,&nbsp;Yousif Subhi","doi":"10.1111/aos.16739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Identifying macular neovascularization (MNV) in eyes with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) has important implications for its management. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is increasingly used for this purpose. Here, we systematically reviewed the literature and conducted meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic accuracy of OCTA for detecting MNV in eyes with CSC. We systematically searched the literature in 12 databases for relevant studies from database inception until 18 November 2023. Eligible studies had eyes with CSC with MNV and CSC without MNV. Index test was OCTA. Reference test was retinal dye angiography. Study selection and data extraction were performed in duplicate, and study was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. Our main outcome of interest was the sensitivity and specificity of OCTA for detecting MNV in CSC. Pooled diagnostic test accuracy estimates were computed using MetaDTA. Of 177 records screened, seven fulfilled the eligibility criteria for our study. These studies summarized data from a total of 1061 eyes. Summary estimate sensitivity and specificity to diagnose MNV in eyes with CSC using OCTA was 92.9% (95% CI: 81.7%–97.5%) and 99.4% (95% CI: 84.1%–100.0%), respectively. The main source of bias across studies was the reference standard, as four studies used multimodal imaging including OCTA for the reference standard. OCTA alone is excellent for detecting MNV in CSC compared to retinal dye angiography or multimodal imaging. Using OCTA first before considering retinal dye angiography could potentially save an important number of retinal dye angiographies.</p>","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":"102 7","pages":"749-758"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aos.16739","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identifying macular neovascularization (MNV) in eyes with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) has important implications for its management. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is increasingly used for this purpose. Here, we systematically reviewed the literature and conducted meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic accuracy of OCTA for detecting MNV in eyes with CSC. We systematically searched the literature in 12 databases for relevant studies from database inception until 18 November 2023. Eligible studies had eyes with CSC with MNV and CSC without MNV. Index test was OCTA. Reference test was retinal dye angiography. Study selection and data extraction were performed in duplicate, and study was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. Our main outcome of interest was the sensitivity and specificity of OCTA for detecting MNV in CSC. Pooled diagnostic test accuracy estimates were computed using MetaDTA. Of 177 records screened, seven fulfilled the eligibility criteria for our study. These studies summarized data from a total of 1061 eyes. Summary estimate sensitivity and specificity to diagnose MNV in eyes with CSC using OCTA was 92.9% (95% CI: 81.7%–97.5%) and 99.4% (95% CI: 84.1%–100.0%), respectively. The main source of bias across studies was the reference standard, as four studies used multimodal imaging including OCTA for the reference standard. OCTA alone is excellent for detecting MNV in CSC compared to retinal dye angiography or multimodal imaging. Using OCTA first before considering retinal dye angiography could potentially save an important number of retinal dye angiographies.

中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变黄斑新生血管的 OCT 血管造影诊断准确性:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
在患有中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变(CSC)的眼睛中识别黄斑新生血管(MNV)对治疗具有重要意义。为此,光学相干断层血管成像(OCTA)的应用越来越广泛。在此,我们系统地回顾了相关文献并进行了荟萃分析,以确定 OCTA 在检测 CSC 眼部 MNV 方面的诊断准确性。我们系统地检索了 12 个数据库中的相关研究文献,检索时间从数据库建立之初到 2023 年 11 月 18 日。符合条件的研究对象包括伴有MNV的CSC眼和不伴有MNV的CSC眼。指标检测为 OCTA。参考检查为视网膜染色血管造影。研究选择和数据提取均一式两份,并使用诊断准确性研究质量评估2对研究进行评估。我们关注的主要结果是 OCTA 检测 CSC 中 MNV 的敏感性和特异性。我们使用 MetaDTA 计算了汇总的诊断测试准确性估计值。在筛选出的 177 份记录中,有 7 份符合我们的研究资格标准。这些研究共汇总了 1061 只眼睛的数据。使用 OCTA 诊断 CSC 眼球 MNV 的估计灵敏度和特异度分别为 92.9%(95% CI:81.7%-97.5%)和 99.4%(95% CI:84.1%-100.0%)。各研究的主要偏差来源于参考标准,因为有四项研究使用了包括 OCTA 在内的多模态成像作为参考标准。与视网膜染料血管造影或多模态成像相比,仅使用 OCTA 就能很好地检测出 CSC 中的 MNV。在考虑进行视网膜染料血管造影之前,首先使用 OCTA 有可能节省大量视网膜染料血管造影的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Ophthalmologica
Acta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
433
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER). Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信