The Kantian origin of Adorno's concept of metaphysical experience

IF 0.7 2区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Farshid Baghai
{"title":"The Kantian origin of Adorno's concept of metaphysical experience","authors":"Farshid Baghai","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Metaphysical experience is one of the most obscure concepts in Adorno's <jats:italic>Negative Dialectics</jats:italic>. The obscurity stems partly from the way in which metaphysical experience is antinomic. To describe the antinomic character of metaphysical experience, Adorno situates it in relation to Kant's first <jats:italic>Critique</jats:italic>. He distinguishes two conceptions of antinomy in the first <jats:italic>Critique</jats:italic>: first, the explicit conception of antinomy that the transcendental dialectic exposes and resolves; and second, the implicit conception of antinomy that remains insoluble and structures the first <jats:italic>Critique</jats:italic> and Adorno's own concept of metaphysical experience. Yet Adorno does not clarify what he means by the antinomic structure of the first <jats:italic>Critique</jats:italic> and how this structure underlies his own concept of metaphysical experience. Nor does the scholarship on Adorno. This article reconstructs Adorno's response to these questions, and, in so doing, demonstrates the Kantian origin of Adorno's concept of metaphysical experience in <jats:italic>Negative Dialectics</jats:italic>.","PeriodicalId":46958,"journal":{"name":"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12985","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Metaphysical experience is one of the most obscure concepts in Adorno's Negative Dialectics. The obscurity stems partly from the way in which metaphysical experience is antinomic. To describe the antinomic character of metaphysical experience, Adorno situates it in relation to Kant's first Critique. He distinguishes two conceptions of antinomy in the first Critique: first, the explicit conception of antinomy that the transcendental dialectic exposes and resolves; and second, the implicit conception of antinomy that remains insoluble and structures the first Critique and Adorno's own concept of metaphysical experience. Yet Adorno does not clarify what he means by the antinomic structure of the first Critique and how this structure underlies his own concept of metaphysical experience. Nor does the scholarship on Adorno. This article reconstructs Adorno's response to these questions, and, in so doing, demonstrates the Kantian origin of Adorno's concept of metaphysical experience in Negative Dialectics.
阿多诺形而上学经验概念的康德起源
形而上学经验是阿多诺《否定辩证法》中最晦涩难懂的概念之一。这种晦涩部分源于形而上学经验的反原子方式。为了描述形而上学经验的反二元性,阿多诺将其与康德的第一次批判联系起来。他区分了第一批判中的两种反传统概念:第一种是超越论辩证法所揭露和解决的显性反传统概念;第二种是仍然无法解决的隐性反传统概念,它构建了第一批判和阿多诺自己的形而上学经验概念。然而,阿多诺并没有阐明他所说的第一批判的反二元结构是什么意思,以及这种结构是如何支撑他自己的形而上学经验观的。关于阿多诺的学术研究也是如此。本文重构了阿多诺对这些问题的回答,并以此证明了阿多诺在《否定辩证法》中形而上学经验概念的康德渊源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: ''Founded by Mark Sacks in 1993, the European Journal of Philosophy has come to occupy a distinctive and highly valued place amongst the philosophical journals. The aim of EJP has been to bring together the best work from those working within the "analytic" and "continental" traditions, and to encourage connections between them, without diluting their respective priorities and concerns. This has enabled EJP to publish a wide range of material of the highest standard from philosophers across the world, reflecting the best thinking from a variety of philosophical perspectives, in a way that is accessible to all of them.''
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信