The State of Mastery Learning in Pediatric Graduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Michaela Mills-Rudy, Megan Thorvilson, Cynthia Chelf, Stephanie Mavis
{"title":"The State of Mastery Learning in Pediatric Graduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review","authors":"Michaela Mills-Rudy, Megan Thorvilson, Cynthia Chelf, Stephanie Mavis","doi":"10.2147/amep.s463382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Objective:</strong> The aim of this study was to characterize the state of mastery learning interventions, identify gaps in current approaches, and highlight opportunities to improve the rigor of ML in pediatric graduate medical education (GME) training programs.<br/><strong>Methods:</strong> In October 2022, we searched Ovid, PubMed, Scopus, and ERIC. Two reviewers independently screened 165 citations and reviewed the full manuscripts of 20 studies. We developed a modified data abstraction tool based on the Recommendations for Reporting Mastery Education Research in Medicine (ReMERM) guidelines and extracted variables related to mastery learning curricular implementation and design and learner assessment.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> Eleven studies of ML approaches within pediatric GME were included in the full review, with over half published after 2020. ML interventions were used to teach both simple and complex tasks, often in heterogeneous learner groups. While deliberate practice and feedback were consistently reported features of ML in pediatrics, opportunities for improvement include clearly defining mastery, conducting learning over multiple sessions, presenting sufficient validity evidence for assessment tools, adhering to rigorous standard setting processes, and reporting psychometric data appropriate for ML.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> In pediatric GME, ML approaches are in their infancy. By addressing common shortcomings in the existing literature, future efforts can improve the rigor of ML in pediatric training programs and its impact on learners and patients.<br/><br/><strong>Plain Language Summary:</strong> While mastery learning is a well-described, effective educational intervention utilized in multiple medical specialties, we perceived a relative lack of published studies on mastery learning in pediatric graduate medical education. Mills-Rudy’s team searched the current literature to identify gaps in mastery learning approaches in pediatrics training and to highlight ways to improve the rigor of mastery learning in pediatric training programs. Their search yielded 11 studies of mastery learning approaches in pediatric graduate medical education. They identified major gaps in curriculum development and implementation as well as learner assessment. Opportunities to improve mastery learning in pediatrics include clearly defining mastery, conducting learning over several sessions, presenting sufficient validity evidence for assessment tools, adhering to rigorous standard setting processes, and reporting psychometric data appropriate for mastery learning. Future mastery learning interventions in pediatrics can address these gaps to improve the rigor of mastery learning in pediatric training programs.<br/><br/><strong>Keywords:</strong> competency-based medical education, graduate medical education<br/>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s463382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to characterize the state of mastery learning interventions, identify gaps in current approaches, and highlight opportunities to improve the rigor of ML in pediatric graduate medical education (GME) training programs.
Methods: In October 2022, we searched Ovid, PubMed, Scopus, and ERIC. Two reviewers independently screened 165 citations and reviewed the full manuscripts of 20 studies. We developed a modified data abstraction tool based on the Recommendations for Reporting Mastery Education Research in Medicine (ReMERM) guidelines and extracted variables related to mastery learning curricular implementation and design and learner assessment.
Results: Eleven studies of ML approaches within pediatric GME were included in the full review, with over half published after 2020. ML interventions were used to teach both simple and complex tasks, often in heterogeneous learner groups. While deliberate practice and feedback were consistently reported features of ML in pediatrics, opportunities for improvement include clearly defining mastery, conducting learning over multiple sessions, presenting sufficient validity evidence for assessment tools, adhering to rigorous standard setting processes, and reporting psychometric data appropriate for ML.
Conclusion: In pediatric GME, ML approaches are in their infancy. By addressing common shortcomings in the existing literature, future efforts can improve the rigor of ML in pediatric training programs and its impact on learners and patients.

Plain Language Summary: While mastery learning is a well-described, effective educational intervention utilized in multiple medical specialties, we perceived a relative lack of published studies on mastery learning in pediatric graduate medical education. Mills-Rudy’s team searched the current literature to identify gaps in mastery learning approaches in pediatrics training and to highlight ways to improve the rigor of mastery learning in pediatric training programs. Their search yielded 11 studies of mastery learning approaches in pediatric graduate medical education. They identified major gaps in curriculum development and implementation as well as learner assessment. Opportunities to improve mastery learning in pediatrics include clearly defining mastery, conducting learning over several sessions, presenting sufficient validity evidence for assessment tools, adhering to rigorous standard setting processes, and reporting psychometric data appropriate for mastery learning. Future mastery learning interventions in pediatrics can address these gaps to improve the rigor of mastery learning in pediatric training programs.

Keywords: competency-based medical education, graduate medical education
儿科毕业医学教育中的掌握学习现状:范围审查
目的:本研究旨在描述掌握学习干预措施的现状,找出当前方法的不足,并强调在儿科研究生医学教育(GME)培训项目中提高掌握学习严格性的机会:2022 年 10 月,我们检索了 Ovid、PubMed、Scopus 和 ERIC。两名审稿人独立筛选了 165 篇引文,并审阅了 20 项研究的完整手稿。我们根据 "医学掌握教育研究报告建议"(ReMERM)指南开发了一个修改过的数据摘要工具,并提取了与掌握学习课程实施和设计以及学习者评估相关的变量:11项关于儿科GME中掌握学习方法的研究被纳入全面综述,其中一半以上的研究发表于2020年之后。掌握学习干预措施既用于教授简单任务,也用于教授复杂任务,通常用于异质学习者群体。虽然儿科ML的特点是刻意练习和反馈,但需要改进的地方包括:明确定义掌握程度、进行多次学习、为评估工具提供充分的有效性证据、坚持严格的标准制定过程,以及报告适合ML的心理测量数据:结论:在儿科高级医学教育中,ML 方法尚处于起步阶段。通过解决现有文献中的共同缺陷,未来的努力可以提高儿科培训项目中掌握学习的严谨性及其对学习者和患者的影响。平实的语言总结:虽然掌握学习是一种描述详尽、有效的教育干预措施,在多个医学专业中都有应用,但我们发现在儿科医学研究生教育中,关于掌握学习的公开研究相对缺乏。米尔斯-鲁迪团队对现有文献进行了检索,以找出掌握学习方法在儿科培训中的不足,并强调如何提高儿科培训项目中掌握学习的严谨性。他们搜索到了11项关于儿科医学研究生教育中掌握学习方法的研究。他们发现了课程开发和实施以及学习者评估方面的主要差距。改进儿科掌握学习方法的机会包括:明确定义掌握、分多次进行学习、为评估工具提供充分的有效性证据、坚持严格的标准制定过程、报告适合掌握学习的心理测量数据。未来的儿科掌握学习干预措施可以弥补这些不足,以提高儿科培训项目中掌握学习的严谨性。 关键词:基于能力的医学教育;医学研究生教育
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信