Probabilistic models of profiles for voting by evaluation
IF 0.5
4区 经济学
Q4 ECONOMICS
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Considering voting rules based on evaluation inputs rather than preference rankings modifies the paradigm of probabilistic studies of voting procedures. This article proposes several simulation models for generating evaluation-based voting inputs. These models can cope with dependent and non identical marginal distributions of the evaluations received by the candidates. A last part is devoted to fitting these models to real data sets.
通过评估进行投票的概况概率模型
考虑基于评价输入而非偏好排名的投票规则，改变了投票程序的概率研究范式。本文提出了几种模拟模型，用于生成基于评价的投票输入。这些模型可以处理候选人所获评价的依赖性和非完全相同的边际分布。最后一部分专门讨论了将这些模型与真实数据集进行拟合的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文
求助全文
来源期刊
Social Choice and Welfare
Multiple-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
56
期刊介绍：
Social Choice and Welfare explores all aspects, both normative and positive, of welfare economics, collective choice, and strategic interaction. Topics include but are not limited to: preference aggregation, welfare criteria, fairness, justice and equity, rights, inequality and poverty measurement, voting and elections, political games, coalition formation, public goods, mechanism design, networks, matching, optimal taxation, cost-benefit analysis, computational social choice, judgement aggregation, market design, behavioral welfare economics, subjective well-being studies and experimental investigations related to social choice and voting. As such, the journal is inter-disciplinary and cuts across the boundaries of economics, political science, philosophy, and mathematics. Articles on choice and order theory that include results that can be applied to the above topics are also included in the journal. While it emphasizes theory, the journal also publishes empirical work in the subject area reflecting cross-fertilizing between theoretical and empirical research. Readers will find original research articles, surveys, and book reviews.Officially cited as: Soc Choice Welf
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
