Reevaluating the epinephrine myth: A comprehensive review

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Sreeganesh Krishnaprabhu, Joe M. Das
{"title":"Reevaluating the epinephrine myth: A comprehensive review","authors":"Sreeganesh Krishnaprabhu, Joe M. Das","doi":"10.4103/ijp.ijp_308_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The combination of local anesthetic drugs with epinephrine has conventionally been contraindicated in acral regions due to concerns of potential necrosis caused by compromised blood flow. However, this belief has been challenged since 2001, when studies demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of the combination. This review aims to analyze reported cases of acral area necrosis following the use of local anesthesia with epinephrine since 2001. A thorough search was conducted on PubMed and Google Scholar using specific keywords to identify articles reporting acral area necrosis caused using local anesthesia and epinephrine. Our search yielded eight publications describing a total of 13 cases of ischemic events in acral areas. These cases involved finger necrosis (five cases), scrotal skin necrosis (two cases), and eyelid necrosis (six cases), following the injection of a combination of epinephrine and lignocaine. The majority of affected patients were female who underwent surgical intervention and reconstruction. The use of epinephrine in local anesthesia offers significant advantages and is generally safe for acral areas. However, the risk of necrosis cannot be entirely eliminated, particularly in patients with compromised vascular function. Adhering to proper guidelines and selecting suitable patients can help mitigate the risk. Phentolamine serves as a potential rescue agent if vascular compromise occurs. Precautionary measures must be taken when using this combination in high-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13490,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijp.ijp_308_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The combination of local anesthetic drugs with epinephrine has conventionally been contraindicated in acral regions due to concerns of potential necrosis caused by compromised blood flow. However, this belief has been challenged since 2001, when studies demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of the combination. This review aims to analyze reported cases of acral area necrosis following the use of local anesthesia with epinephrine since 2001. A thorough search was conducted on PubMed and Google Scholar using specific keywords to identify articles reporting acral area necrosis caused using local anesthesia and epinephrine. Our search yielded eight publications describing a total of 13 cases of ischemic events in acral areas. These cases involved finger necrosis (five cases), scrotal skin necrosis (two cases), and eyelid necrosis (six cases), following the injection of a combination of epinephrine and lignocaine. The majority of affected patients were female who underwent surgical intervention and reconstruction. The use of epinephrine in local anesthesia offers significant advantages and is generally safe for acral areas. However, the risk of necrosis cannot be entirely eliminated, particularly in patients with compromised vascular function. Adhering to proper guidelines and selecting suitable patients can help mitigate the risk. Phentolamine serves as a potential rescue agent if vascular compromise occurs. Precautionary measures must be taken when using this combination in high-risk patients.

重新评估肾上腺素神话:全面回顾
由于担心血流受阻可能导致坏死,局麻药与肾上腺素的联合使用一直是尖锐湿疣区域的禁忌。然而,自 2001 年以来,这种观点受到了质疑,因为当时的研究证明了联合用药的安全性和有效性。本综述旨在分析自 2001 年以来使用肾上腺素局部麻醉后出现的尖锐湿疣坏死病例。我们使用特定关键词在 PubMed 和 Google Scholar 上进行了全面搜索,以找出报道使用局部麻醉和肾上腺素导致尖锐湿疣坏死的文章。我们的搜索结果显示,有 8 篇文献共描述了 13 例尖锐湿疣部位缺血事件。这些病例涉及手指坏死(5 例)、阴囊皮肤坏死(2 例)和眼睑坏死(6 例),都是在注射肾上腺素和木质碱的组合物后发生的。大多数患者为女性,她们都接受了手术治疗和重建。在局部麻醉中使用肾上腺素具有显著的优势,而且对于痤疮部位一般是安全的。然而,坏死的风险并不能完全排除,尤其是血管功能受损的患者。遵守正确的指导原则并选择合适的患者有助于降低风险。如果血管受损,酚妥拉明可作为一种潜在的抢救药物。在高危患者中使用这种联合用药时,必须采取预防措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
53
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Pharmacology accepts, in English, review articles, articles for educational forum, original research articles (full length and short communications), letter to editor, case reports and interesting fillers. Articles concerning all aspects of pharmacology will be considered. Articles of general interest (e.g. methods, therapeutics, medical education, interesting websites, new drug information and commentary on a recent topic) are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信