Selection of Suitable Methods for Sample Preparation and Desorbing Agents for Determination of Nutrient Contents in Scots Pine Roots

IF 1.1 4区 生物学 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES
Y. V. Ivanov, A. V. Kartashov, A. I. Ivanova
{"title":"Selection of Suitable Methods for Sample Preparation and Desorbing Agents for Determination of Nutrient Contents in Scots Pine Roots","authors":"Y. V. Ivanov, A. V. Kartashov, A. I. Ivanova","doi":"10.1134/s1021443724605767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>Determining the nutrient composition of woody plant roots is an important tool for studying the physiological response of trees to various environmental factors. Considering the complexity and labor intensity of collecting the roots of woody plants, especially coniferous plants, it is of particular importance to use a suitable method for the desorption of excess nutrients from the root surface to avoid the overestimation of nutrient content within the roots. In the present study, various methods for sample preparation of the roots of both Scots pine (<i>Pinus sylvestris</i> L.) seedlings grown in hydroculture with different aeration regimes and saplings grown in soil substrates were investigated to determine the contents of magnesium, potassium, calcium, phosphorus, iron, manganese, zinc and copper. The possibility of using root samples frozen in liquid nitrogen was also investigated. The effectiveness of different desorbing agents such as Na<sub>2</sub>-EDTA, dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate, CaCl<sub>2</sub> and MES-Tris for nutrient removal from the root surface, as well as the duration of incubation, were studied. It was shown that desorption of nutrients from roots using EDTA is the preferred method when working with soil-grown roots. In the absence of iron-manganese plaques on the root surface, treatment of roots with DCB should not exceed 5-10 minutes to avoid ion leakage from root cells. If it is not possible to use any extraction methods, it is sufficient to mechanically remove the remaining soil particles from roots, rinse the roots with water and dry. However, this sample preparation method is not suitable for determining the iron content in roots.</p>","PeriodicalId":21477,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Plant Physiology","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Plant Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1134/s1021443724605767","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Determining the nutrient composition of woody plant roots is an important tool for studying the physiological response of trees to various environmental factors. Considering the complexity and labor intensity of collecting the roots of woody plants, especially coniferous plants, it is of particular importance to use a suitable method for the desorption of excess nutrients from the root surface to avoid the overestimation of nutrient content within the roots. In the present study, various methods for sample preparation of the roots of both Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedlings grown in hydroculture with different aeration regimes and saplings grown in soil substrates were investigated to determine the contents of magnesium, potassium, calcium, phosphorus, iron, manganese, zinc and copper. The possibility of using root samples frozen in liquid nitrogen was also investigated. The effectiveness of different desorbing agents such as Na2-EDTA, dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate, CaCl2 and MES-Tris for nutrient removal from the root surface, as well as the duration of incubation, were studied. It was shown that desorption of nutrients from roots using EDTA is the preferred method when working with soil-grown roots. In the absence of iron-manganese plaques on the root surface, treatment of roots with DCB should not exceed 5-10 minutes to avoid ion leakage from root cells. If it is not possible to use any extraction methods, it is sufficient to mechanically remove the remaining soil particles from roots, rinse the roots with water and dry. However, this sample preparation method is not suitable for determining the iron content in roots.

Abstract Image

为测定苏格兰松树根中的营养成分选择合适的样品制备和解吸剂方法
摘要 确定木本植物根系的营养成分是研究树木对各种环境因素生理反应的重要工具。考虑到采集木本植物(尤其是针叶植物)根系的复杂性和劳动强度,使用合适的方法解吸根系表面多余的养分以避免高估根系内的养分含量尤为重要。在本研究中,研究人员采用多种方法制备了在不同通气制度下水培生长的苏格兰松树(Pinus sylvestris L.)幼苗和在土壤基质中生长的树苗的根部样本,以测定镁、钾、钙、磷、铁、锰、锌和铜的含量。此外,还研究了使用冷冻在液氮中的根样本的可能性。研究了不同解吸剂(如 Na2-EDTA、二亚硫酸盐-柠檬酸-碳酸氢盐、CaCl2 和 MES-Tris)从根表面去除养分的效果以及培养时间的长短。结果表明,在处理土壤中生长的根系时,使用 EDTA 从根系中解吸养分是首选方法。在根表面没有铁锰斑块的情况下,用 DCB 处理根的时间不应超过 5-10 分钟,以避免根细胞中的离子泄漏。如果无法使用任何提取方法,只需用机械方法去除根部残留的土壤颗粒,用水冲洗根部并晾干即可。但这种样品制备方法不适合测定根中的铁含量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
107
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Russian Journal of Plant Physiology is a leading journal in phytophysiology. It embraces the full spectrum of plant physiology and brings together the related aspects of biophysics, biochemistry, cytology, anatomy, genetics, etc. The journal publishes experimental and theoretical articles, reviews, short communications, and descriptions of new methods. Some issues cover special problems of plant physiology, thus presenting collections of articles and providing information in rapidly growing fields. The editorial board is highly interested in publishing research from all countries and accepts manuscripts in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信