Infection in preterm infants receiving topical emollient oil massage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Fekadeselassie Belege Getaneh, Aden Asmare, Bezabih Abayneh, Endalk Birre, Anissa Mohammed, Amare Muche, Alemu Gedefie, Yibeltal Asmamaw, Zemen Mengesha, Natnael Moges, Dires Mihretie Birhanu, Zebenay Workneh Bitew, Asressie Molla
{"title":"Infection in preterm infants receiving topical emollient oil massage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials","authors":"Fekadeselassie Belege Getaneh, Aden Asmare, Bezabih Abayneh, Endalk Birre, Anissa Mohammed, Amare Muche, Alemu Gedefie, Yibeltal Asmamaw, Zemen Mengesha, Natnael Moges, Dires Mihretie Birhanu, Zebenay Workneh Bitew, Asressie Molla","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Preterm infants are highly susceptible to infections, which significantly contribute to morbidity and mortality. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the effectiveness of topical emollient oil application in preventing infections among preterm infants. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, Clinical trials, Epistemonikos, HINARI and Global Index Medicus) and other sources. A total of 2185 articles were identified and screened for eligibility. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomised controlled trials. Data analysis was performed using StataCrop MP V.17 software. Heterogeneity among the studies was evaluated using the I2 and Cochrane Q test statistics. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist guided the presentation of the results. Results Of 2185 retrieved articles from initial searches, 11 met eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis. A random effects meta-analysis revealed that infants who received massages with emollient oils had a 21% reduced risk of infection (risk ratio=0.79, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.97, I2=0.00%). Subgroup analyses indicated that preterm babies who received topical emollient oil massages with coconut oil, administered twice a day for more than 2 weeks, had a lower likelihood of acquiring an infection compared with their non-massaged counterparts. Conclusion It is quite evident from this analysis that topical emollient oil application in preterm neonates is most likely effective in preventing infection. However, further studies, particularly from the African continent, are warranted to support universal recommendations.","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002364","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Preterm infants are highly susceptible to infections, which significantly contribute to morbidity and mortality. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the effectiveness of topical emollient oil application in preventing infections among preterm infants. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, Clinical trials, Epistemonikos, HINARI and Global Index Medicus) and other sources. A total of 2185 articles were identified and screened for eligibility. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomised controlled trials. Data analysis was performed using StataCrop MP V.17 software. Heterogeneity among the studies was evaluated using the I2 and Cochrane Q test statistics. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist guided the presentation of the results. Results Of 2185 retrieved articles from initial searches, 11 met eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis. A random effects meta-analysis revealed that infants who received massages with emollient oils had a 21% reduced risk of infection (risk ratio=0.79, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.97, I2=0.00%). Subgroup analyses indicated that preterm babies who received topical emollient oil massages with coconut oil, administered twice a day for more than 2 weeks, had a lower likelihood of acquiring an infection compared with their non-massaged counterparts. Conclusion It is quite evident from this analysis that topical emollient oil application in preterm neonates is most likely effective in preventing infection. However, further studies, particularly from the African continent, are warranted to support universal recommendations.
接受局部润肤油按摩的早产儿感染情况:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景早产儿极易受到感染,这在很大程度上导致了早产儿的发病率和死亡率。本系统综述和荟萃分析调查了局部涂抹润肤油对预防早产儿感染的有效性。方法 对多个电子数据库(PubMed、Cochrane、Scopus、Clinical trials、Epistemonikos、HINARI 和 Global Index Medicus)和其他来源进行了全面检索。共鉴定并筛选出 2185 篇文章。采用针对随机对照试验的 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具对纳入研究的质量进行了评估。数据分析采用 StataCrop MP V.17 软件进行。使用 I2 和 Cochrane Q 检验统计量评估研究之间的异质性。还进行了敏感性分析和亚组分析。系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目 "清单指导了结果的呈现。结果 在最初检索到的 2185 篇文章中,有 11 篇符合资格标准并被纳入最终分析。随机效应荟萃分析显示,接受润肤油按摩的婴儿感染风险降低了 21%(风险比=0.79,95% CI 0.64 至 0.97,I2=0.00%)。分组分析表明,与未接受按摩的早产儿相比,接受椰子油局部润肤油按摩(每天两次,持续两周以上)的早产儿感染的可能性更低。结论 从本分析中可以明显看出,早产新生儿局部涂抹润肤油很可能能有效预防感染。不过,还需要进一步的研究,尤其是非洲大陆的研究,以支持普遍建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ Paediatrics Open Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信