Spatial and seasonal patterns of temperature lapse rate along elevation transects leading to treelines in different climate regimes of the Himalaya

IF 3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Rajesh Joshi, Ninchhen Dolma Tamang, Wagmare Balraju, S. P. Singh
{"title":"Spatial and seasonal patterns of temperature lapse rate along elevation transects leading to treelines in different climate regimes of the Himalaya","authors":"Rajesh Joshi, Ninchhen Dolma Tamang, Wagmare Balraju, S. P. Singh","doi":"10.1007/s10531-024-02879-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There are growing evidences that indicate the Himalayan region is warming rapidly with more warming in high elevation areas. The elevation-dependent warming (EDW) accelerates the rate of change in mountain ecosystems, including cryosphere, hydrology, biodiversity and socio-economic systems. Here, we present temperature lapse rates (TLRs) based on primary data from 21 stations for three elevation transects leading to treeline (Western Himalaya: WH; Central Himalaya: CH; Eastern Himalaya: EH) representing different climate regimes along the Indian region of Himalayan Arc. TLRs were calculated using high temporal resolution data collected for 2 years (2017–2018) from complex Himalayan terrain. The annual mean TLR increased with decreasing moisture, being markedly higher for dry WH transect (− 0.66 °C/100 m) than at moderately moist CH (− 0.52 °C/100 m) and characteristically moist EH transect (− 0.50 °C/100 m). The One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) confirms that the TLR varied spatially, declining from West to East across the Himalayan Arc, and significantly differed seasonally. The lowest mean TLRs were found during the winter season (EH: − 0.46 °C/100 m; CH: − 0.40 °C/100 m; WH: − 0.31 °C/100 m). The monthly TLR for EH transect varied within a narrower range (− 0.32 °C/100 m to − 0.54 °C/100 m), than for CH transect (− 0.24 °C/100 m to − 0.68 °C/100 m), and WH transect (− 0.26 °C/100 m to − 0.90 °C/100 m). The lowest monthly TLR occurred in December (− 0.24 °C/100 m to − 0.32 °C/100 m) for all three transects. The relationship of TLR with rainfall and saturation vapor pressure was analyzed for CH transect to find out influence of these factors on seasonal variation in lapse rate. Moisture, snow albedo and reflectance are the factors which largely control the TLR along the elevation transects. The shallow TLR and higher growing season temperature values (9.2 ± 1.8 °C, 10.0 ± 1.4 °C, and 7.8 ± 1.7 °C), than normally found at treelines, may suggest that treeline environment in Himalaya is warming more rapidly than lowland areas. TLR was lowest in December due to reduced albedo and EDW, which influence treeline dynamics, snow and moisture regime, surface energy balance, species distribution, and growing season of alpine vegetation. The findings of this study provide useful insights to re-parameterize the climate models over the Himalayan region. This study facilitates in improving interpolation of air temperature for ecological studies in un-gauged and data-sparse regions, especially for the alpine region of Himalaya where observed data are extremely scarce.</p>","PeriodicalId":8843,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity and Conservation","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodiversity and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02879-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are growing evidences that indicate the Himalayan region is warming rapidly with more warming in high elevation areas. The elevation-dependent warming (EDW) accelerates the rate of change in mountain ecosystems, including cryosphere, hydrology, biodiversity and socio-economic systems. Here, we present temperature lapse rates (TLRs) based on primary data from 21 stations for three elevation transects leading to treeline (Western Himalaya: WH; Central Himalaya: CH; Eastern Himalaya: EH) representing different climate regimes along the Indian region of Himalayan Arc. TLRs were calculated using high temporal resolution data collected for 2 years (2017–2018) from complex Himalayan terrain. The annual mean TLR increased with decreasing moisture, being markedly higher for dry WH transect (− 0.66 °C/100 m) than at moderately moist CH (− 0.52 °C/100 m) and characteristically moist EH transect (− 0.50 °C/100 m). The One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) confirms that the TLR varied spatially, declining from West to East across the Himalayan Arc, and significantly differed seasonally. The lowest mean TLRs were found during the winter season (EH: − 0.46 °C/100 m; CH: − 0.40 °C/100 m; WH: − 0.31 °C/100 m). The monthly TLR for EH transect varied within a narrower range (− 0.32 °C/100 m to − 0.54 °C/100 m), than for CH transect (− 0.24 °C/100 m to − 0.68 °C/100 m), and WH transect (− 0.26 °C/100 m to − 0.90 °C/100 m). The lowest monthly TLR occurred in December (− 0.24 °C/100 m to − 0.32 °C/100 m) for all three transects. The relationship of TLR with rainfall and saturation vapor pressure was analyzed for CH transect to find out influence of these factors on seasonal variation in lapse rate. Moisture, snow albedo and reflectance are the factors which largely control the TLR along the elevation transects. The shallow TLR and higher growing season temperature values (9.2 ± 1.8 °C, 10.0 ± 1.4 °C, and 7.8 ± 1.7 °C), than normally found at treelines, may suggest that treeline environment in Himalaya is warming more rapidly than lowland areas. TLR was lowest in December due to reduced albedo and EDW, which influence treeline dynamics, snow and moisture regime, surface energy balance, species distribution, and growing season of alpine vegetation. The findings of this study provide useful insights to re-parameterize the climate models over the Himalayan region. This study facilitates in improving interpolation of air temperature for ecological studies in un-gauged and data-sparse regions, especially for the alpine region of Himalaya where observed data are extremely scarce.

Abstract Image

喜马拉雅山脉不同气候条件下通往树线的海拔横断面温度递减率的空间和季节模式
越来越多的证据表明,喜马拉雅地区正在迅速变暖,高海拔地区的变暖幅度更大。随海拔升高而变暖(EDW)加快了山区生态系统的变化速度,包括低温层、水文、生物多样性和社会经济系统。在此,我们介绍了基于 21 个站点原始数据的温度失效率(TLRs),这些站点分布在通往林木线的三个海拔横断面上(喜马拉雅西部:WH;喜马拉雅中部:CH;喜马拉雅东部:EH),代表了喜马拉雅弧线印度地区的不同气候系统。利用从喜马拉雅复杂地形收集的两年(2017-2018 年)高时间分辨率数据计算了 TLR。年平均 TLR 随湿度下降而增加,干燥的 WH 横断面(- 0.66 °C/100米)明显高于适度湿润的 CH 横断面(- 0.52 °C/100米)和典型湿润的 EH 横断面(- 0.50 °C/100米)。单因子方差分析(ANOVA)证实,TLR 在空间上存在差异,在喜马拉雅弧线上由西向东递减,在季节上也存在显著差异。冬季的平均 TLR 最低(EH:- 0.46 °C/100米;CH:- 0.40 °C/100米;WH:- 0.31 °C/100米)。与 CH 断面(- 0.24 ℃/100 m 至 - 0.68 ℃/100 m)和 WH 断面(- 0.26 ℃/100 m 至 - 0.90 ℃/100 m)相比,EH 断面的月 TLR 变化范围较窄(- 0.32 ℃/100 m 至 - 0.54 ℃/100 m)。所有三个横断面的最低月平均温度变率出现在 12 月(- 0.24 ℃/100 米至 - 0.32 ℃/100 米)。分析了 CH 断面的失效率与降雨量和饱和蒸汽压的关系,以找出这些因素对失效率季节变化的影响。水分、雪反照率和反射率在很大程度上控制着高程断面的失效率。与通常情况下在林线发现的温度值(9.2 ± 1.8 °C、10.0 ± 1.4 °C和 7.8 ± 1.7 °C)相比,TLR较浅,生长季节温度值较高,这可能表明喜马拉雅山的林线环境比低洼地区变暖更快。12 月份的 TLR 最低,这是因为反照率和 EDW 减少了,而反照率和 EDW 会影响高山植被的树线动态、积雪和水分系统、地表能量平衡、物种分布和生长季节。这项研究的结果为重新设定喜马拉雅地区气候模式的参数提供了有用的见解。这项研究有助于改进气温内插法,以便在无测站和数据稀缺的地区进行生态研究,尤其是在观测数据极为稀缺的喜马拉雅高山地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biodiversity and Conservation
Biodiversity and Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
153
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: Biodiversity and Conservation is an international journal that publishes articles on all aspects of biological diversity-its description, analysis and conservation, and its controlled rational use by humankind. The scope of Biodiversity and Conservation is wide and multidisciplinary, and embraces all life-forms. The journal presents research papers, as well as editorials, comments and research notes on biodiversity and conservation, and contributions dealing with the practicalities of conservation management, economic, social and political issues. The journal provides a forum for examining conflicts between sustainable development and human dependence on biodiversity in agriculture, environmental management and biotechnology, and encourages contributions from developing countries to promote broad global perspectives on matters of biodiversity and conservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信