Ning Hsieh, Deirdre Shires, Hui Liu, Sam Safford, Kryssia J. Campos
{"title":"Unequal Access to Primary Care Providers at the Intersection of Race/Ethnicity, Sexual Orientation, and Gender","authors":"Ning Hsieh, Deirdre Shires, Hui Liu, Sam Safford, Kryssia J. Campos","doi":"10.1007/s11113-024-09898-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Not all U.S. populations have equal access to a primary care provider (PCP). This study presents one of the first population-based evidence of inequities in access to PCPs at the intersection of race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and gender. We analyzed pooled data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System from 2016 to 2021 across 42 states and 1 territory in the United States. The final sample encompassed 1,142,344 respondents aged 18 and older. Logistic regression models, stratified by gender spectrum, were estimated to compare predicted probabilities of having a PCP across 20 sexual and racial/ethnic identity groups. Among those on the feminine spectrum, most sexual minorities of color exhibited lower rates of having a PCP compared to heterosexual White individuals. Even when sociodemographic and health factors were accounted for, PCP access disadvantages remained significant in some groups of Native and Hispanic sexual minorities. Among sexual minorities of color on the masculine spectrum, inequities were less prominent, and sociodemographic and health factors nearly explained all their disadvantages. Sexual orientation, gender, and race/ethnicity intersect to shape the access to PCPs. Future research, policy designs, and clinical practices should adopt an intersectional approach to achieve a better understanding of healthcare inequities and to reduce inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47633,"journal":{"name":"Population Research and Policy Review","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Research and Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-024-09898-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Not all U.S. populations have equal access to a primary care provider (PCP). This study presents one of the first population-based evidence of inequities in access to PCPs at the intersection of race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and gender. We analyzed pooled data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System from 2016 to 2021 across 42 states and 1 territory in the United States. The final sample encompassed 1,142,344 respondents aged 18 and older. Logistic regression models, stratified by gender spectrum, were estimated to compare predicted probabilities of having a PCP across 20 sexual and racial/ethnic identity groups. Among those on the feminine spectrum, most sexual minorities of color exhibited lower rates of having a PCP compared to heterosexual White individuals. Even when sociodemographic and health factors were accounted for, PCP access disadvantages remained significant in some groups of Native and Hispanic sexual minorities. Among sexual minorities of color on the masculine spectrum, inequities were less prominent, and sociodemographic and health factors nearly explained all their disadvantages. Sexual orientation, gender, and race/ethnicity intersect to shape the access to PCPs. Future research, policy designs, and clinical practices should adopt an intersectional approach to achieve a better understanding of healthcare inequities and to reduce inequities.
期刊介绍:
Now accepted in JSTOR! Population Research and Policy Review has a twofold goal: it provides a convenient source for government officials and scholars in which they can learn about the policy implications of recent research relevant to the causes and consequences of changing population size and composition; and it provides a broad, interdisciplinary coverage of population research.
Population Research and Policy Review seeks to publish quality material of interest to professionals working in the fields of population, and those fields which intersect and overlap with population studies. The publication includes demographic, economic, social, political and health research papers and related contributions which are based on either the direct scientific evaluation of particular policies or programs, or general contributions intended to advance knowledge that informs policy and program development.