Factors influencing European river lamprey passage at a tidal river barrier

IF 2.2 3区 生物学 Q1 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Angus J. Lothian, Jonathan D. Bolland, Atticus J. Albright, William M. Jubb, Damian H. Bubb, Richard A. A. Noble, Andrew D. Nunn, Jamie R. Dodd, Jeroen S. Tummers, Martyn C. Lucas
{"title":"Factors influencing European river lamprey passage at a tidal river barrier","authors":"Angus J. Lothian, Jonathan D. Bolland, Atticus J. Albright, William M. Jubb, Damian H. Bubb, Richard A. A. Noble, Andrew D. Nunn, Jamie R. Dodd, Jeroen S. Tummers, Martyn C. Lucas","doi":"10.1007/s10750-024-05633-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding and improving passage by diadromous species at tidal barriers is less well advanced than that for non-tidal anthropogenic river barriers. This study assessed factors affecting upstream passage of anadromous river lamprey (<i>Lampetra fluviatilis</i>) at a tidal weir with pool-and-weir (PAW) and bypass (BP) fishways. A Continuous Time Markov Model (CTMM) was used to analyse migration behaviours of 120 acoustic- and PIT-tagged lamprey across 2 years. The weir was a major barrier to upstream migration with a mean time of 31.0 days taken to pass the weir compared to 2.5 days for the unobstructed reach immediately downstream. River stage was the most important variable associated with weir passage, with a 5.68 (CI = 3.95, 8.17) increase in passage probability for every 1 m river stage increase. Passage was predominately over the weir directly rather than by the fishways. Monitoring the fishways using additional PIT-tagged lamprey (<i>n</i> = 2814) suggested poor entrance efficiency (BP<sub>2018</sub>, 28.6%; BP<sub>2019</sub>, 53.1%; PAW<sub>2018</sub>, 37.0%). Successful fishway passage was estimated as 5.4% (BP<sub>2019</sub>)–9.0% (PAW<sub>2018</sub>) of lamprey that entered. Effective fishway entrance for lamprey is probably facilitated by high fishway discharge, yet high-velocity areas may have made it difficult for river lamprey to successfully ascend the fishways.</p>","PeriodicalId":13147,"journal":{"name":"Hydrobiologia","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05633-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding and improving passage by diadromous species at tidal barriers is less well advanced than that for non-tidal anthropogenic river barriers. This study assessed factors affecting upstream passage of anadromous river lamprey (Lampetra fluviatilis) at a tidal weir with pool-and-weir (PAW) and bypass (BP) fishways. A Continuous Time Markov Model (CTMM) was used to analyse migration behaviours of 120 acoustic- and PIT-tagged lamprey across 2 years. The weir was a major barrier to upstream migration with a mean time of 31.0 days taken to pass the weir compared to 2.5 days for the unobstructed reach immediately downstream. River stage was the most important variable associated with weir passage, with a 5.68 (CI = 3.95, 8.17) increase in passage probability for every 1 m river stage increase. Passage was predominately over the weir directly rather than by the fishways. Monitoring the fishways using additional PIT-tagged lamprey (n = 2814) suggested poor entrance efficiency (BP2018, 28.6%; BP2019, 53.1%; PAW2018, 37.0%). Successful fishway passage was estimated as 5.4% (BP2019)–9.0% (PAW2018) of lamprey that entered. Effective fishway entrance for lamprey is probably facilitated by high fishway discharge, yet high-velocity areas may have made it difficult for river lamprey to successfully ascend the fishways.

Abstract Image

影响欧洲河鳗通过潮汐河屏障的因素
与非潮汐的人为河流障碍相比,了解和改善溯河物种在潮汐障碍中的通过情况还不够深入。本研究评估了影响溯河灯鱼(Lampetra fluviatilis)在带有池堰(PAW)和旁路(BP)鱼道的潮汐堰上游通过的因素。利用连续时间马尔可夫模型(CTMM)分析了120条声学和PIT标记的鳗鱼在两年中的迁徙行为。堰塞湖是上游洄游的主要障碍,通过堰塞湖的平均时间为 31.0 天,而通过下游无障碍河段的平均时间为 2.5 天。河水水位是与堰塞湖通过相关的最重要变量,河水水位每增加 1 米,通过概率就会增加 5.68(CI = 3.95,8.17)。鱼类主要是直接通过堰塞湖,而不是通过鱼道。使用额外的 PIT 标记灯鱼(n = 2814)对鱼道进行监测表明,入口效率较低(BP2018,28.6%;BP2019,53.1%;PAW2018,37.0%)。成功通过鱼道的鳗鱼估计为 5.4%(BP2019)-9.0%(PAW2018)。鱼道排水量大可能有利于灯鱼有效进入鱼道,但高速区域可能使灯鱼难以成功登上鱼道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hydrobiologia
Hydrobiologia 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
11.50%
发文量
288
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Hydrobiologia publishes original research, reviews and opinions regarding the biology of all aquatic environments, including the impact of human activities. We welcome molecular-, organism-, community- and ecosystem-level studies in contributions dealing with limnology and oceanography, including systematics and aquatic ecology. Hypothesis-driven experimental research is preferred, but also theoretical papers or articles with large descriptive content will be considered, provided they are made relevant to a broad hydrobiological audience. Applied aspects will be considered if firmly embedded in an ecological context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信