Paradigm shift in transfusion practices during early COVID-19 pandemic: A single center retrospective study.

Sumukh Arun Kumar, Sushmita Prabhu, Ankushi Sanghvi, Maya Gogtay, Mithil Gowda Suresh, Harshit Khosla, Yuvaraj Singh, Ajay Kumar Mishra, Susan George
{"title":"Paradigm shift in transfusion practices during early COVID-19 pandemic: A single center retrospective study.","authors":"Sumukh Arun Kumar, Sushmita Prabhu, Ankushi Sanghvi, Maya Gogtay, Mithil Gowda Suresh, Harshit Khosla, Yuvaraj Singh, Ajay Kumar Mishra, Susan George","doi":"10.5501/wjv.v13.i2.92944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The advent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) unveiled the worst national blood crisis that the United States had witnessed in over a decade. With the pandemic influencing the different stages of the acquisition of blood products outside the hospital setting, we aimed to explore the possible barriers contributing to the shortage of blood products within the medical community.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the adherence to restrictive blood transfusion practices for patients in the COVID era and pre-COVID era.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study on hospitalized patients distinguishing the pattern of blood transfusion during the COVID and pre-COVID era in a community hospital. Data was tabulated to include the number of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions and if transfusions met restrictive blood transfusion criteria as per institutional guidelines. Chi-square was applied to test the statistical association between qualitative variables. Unpaired <i>t</i> test and Mann Whitney <i>U</i> test were applied respectively to test the mean difference of quantitative variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 208 patients were included in the study, of which 108 were during COVID era and 100 were during pre-COVID era. The leading reason for admission in both the COVID era and pre-COVID era transfused patients was shortness of breath (53.7% and 36% <i>P</i> = 0.001), followed by gastrointestinal bleeding (25.9% and 21% <i>P</i> = 0.001). There was a higher percentage of RBC transfusions in the intensive care unit in the COVID-era group than in the pre-COVID era group (38.9% <i>vs</i> 22%, <i>P</i> = 0.008). The restrictive transfusion criteria were met in 62% <i>vs</i> 79% in the COVID and pre-COVID eras, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The COVID-era group received RBC transfusions with less stringent adherence to restrictive blood transfusion practices in comparison to pre-COVID era group.</p>","PeriodicalId":61903,"journal":{"name":"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)","volume":"13 2","pages":"92944"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11229847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5501/wjv.v13.i2.92944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The advent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) unveiled the worst national blood crisis that the United States had witnessed in over a decade. With the pandemic influencing the different stages of the acquisition of blood products outside the hospital setting, we aimed to explore the possible barriers contributing to the shortage of blood products within the medical community.

Aim: To assess the adherence to restrictive blood transfusion practices for patients in the COVID era and pre-COVID era.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study on hospitalized patients distinguishing the pattern of blood transfusion during the COVID and pre-COVID era in a community hospital. Data was tabulated to include the number of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions and if transfusions met restrictive blood transfusion criteria as per institutional guidelines. Chi-square was applied to test the statistical association between qualitative variables. Unpaired t test and Mann Whitney U test were applied respectively to test the mean difference of quantitative variables.

Results: A total of 208 patients were included in the study, of which 108 were during COVID era and 100 were during pre-COVID era. The leading reason for admission in both the COVID era and pre-COVID era transfused patients was shortness of breath (53.7% and 36% P = 0.001), followed by gastrointestinal bleeding (25.9% and 21% P = 0.001). There was a higher percentage of RBC transfusions in the intensive care unit in the COVID-era group than in the pre-COVID era group (38.9% vs 22%, P = 0.008). The restrictive transfusion criteria were met in 62% vs 79% in the COVID and pre-COVID eras, respectively (P = 0.008).

Conclusion: The COVID-era group received RBC transfusions with less stringent adherence to restrictive blood transfusion practices in comparison to pre-COVID era group.

早期 COVID-19 大流行期间输血做法的范式转变:单中心回顾性研究
背景:2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的出现揭示了美国十多年来最严重的全国性血液危机。由于该流行病影响了在医院外获取血液制品的不同阶段,我们旨在探索导致医疗界血液制品短缺的可能障碍。目的:评估 COVID 时代和前 COVID 时代患者对限制性输血做法的遵守情况:我们对一家社区医院的住院病人进行了一项回顾性横断面研究,以区分 COVID 时代和前 COVID 时代的输血模式。数据包括输注红细胞(RBC)的次数,以及输血是否符合机构指南规定的限制性输血标准。采用卡方检验定性变量之间的统计学关联。非配对 t 检验和曼-惠特尼 U 检验分别用于检验定量变量的均值差异:研究共纳入了 208 名患者,其中 108 名是 COVID 时代的患者,100 名是前 COVID 时代的患者。COVID 时代和前 COVID 时代输血患者入院的主要原因都是呼吸急促(53.7% 和 36% P = 0.001),其次是消化道出血(25.9% 和 21% P = 0.001)。与 COVID 时代之前组相比,COVID 时代组在重症监护室输注红细胞的比例更高(38.9% 对 22%,P = 0.008)。符合限制性输血标准的比例在 COVID 时代和前 COVID 时代分别为 62% 和 79%(P = 0.008):结论:与 COVID 时代之前的组别相比,COVID 时代的组别在接受红细胞输注时对限制性输血实践的遵守程度较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
171
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信