Evaluation of orthodontists' attitudes and practices regarding residual resin removal methods.

Q2 Medicine
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics Pub Date : 2024-07-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2177-6709.29.3.e242402.oar
Lívia Lima de Moraes Barreto, Sarah Aquino de Almeida, Fernanda Campos Machado, Robert Willer Farinazzo Vitral, Marcio José da Silva Campos
{"title":"Evaluation of orthodontists' attitudes and practices regarding residual resin removal methods.","authors":"Lívia Lima de Moraes Barreto, Sarah Aquino de Almeida, Fernanda Campos Machado, Robert Willer Farinazzo Vitral, Marcio José da Silva Campos","doi":"10.1590/2177-6709.29.3.e242402.oar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The removal of residual resins is a routine procedure in orthodontic clinics and of great importance to the final result of the treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the main methods of residual resin removal used by orthodontists, and the main reasons for choosing these methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire consisting of 21 questions: 6 relating to demographic data and the other 15 relating to two methods used to remove residual resins (drills or pliers) was sent by e-mail to orthodontists registered with the Regional Councils of Dentistry of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) within April and June, 2023. Questionnaires were sent back by 153 professionals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Residual resin removal is always carried out with high speed drill for 44.7% of the sample, and with low speed drill for 28.7%; 61.3% use irrigation. The multi-laminate carbide bur is used by 82.5% of orthodontists. Pliers are always used by 12.4%. Resin-removing pliers with Widia are used in 39% of cases. The use of high speed was justified by the shorter working time, and the choice of pliers was justified by the smaller damage to the tooth enamel.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most used residual resin removal method was the multi-laminate carbide bur at high speed with irrigation, justified the by shorter working time.</p>","PeriodicalId":38720,"journal":{"name":"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"29 3","pages":"e242402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11235571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.29.3.e242402.oar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The removal of residual resins is a routine procedure in orthodontic clinics and of great importance to the final result of the treatment.

Objective: To evaluate the main methods of residual resin removal used by orthodontists, and the main reasons for choosing these methods.

Methods: A questionnaire consisting of 21 questions: 6 relating to demographic data and the other 15 relating to two methods used to remove residual resins (drills or pliers) was sent by e-mail to orthodontists registered with the Regional Councils of Dentistry of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) within April and June, 2023. Questionnaires were sent back by 153 professionals.

Results: Residual resin removal is always carried out with high speed drill for 44.7% of the sample, and with low speed drill for 28.7%; 61.3% use irrigation. The multi-laminate carbide bur is used by 82.5% of orthodontists. Pliers are always used by 12.4%. Resin-removing pliers with Widia are used in 39% of cases. The use of high speed was justified by the shorter working time, and the choice of pliers was justified by the smaller damage to the tooth enamel.

Conclusion: The most used residual resin removal method was the multi-laminate carbide bur at high speed with irrigation, justified the by shorter working time.

评估正畸医生对残留树脂清除方法的态度和做法。
简介清除残留树脂是正畸诊所的常规程序,对治疗的最终效果非常重要:评估正畸医生使用的去除残留树脂的主要方法,以及选择这些方法的主要原因:方法:调查问卷包括 21 个问题:2023年4月和6月期间,通过电子邮件向在圣保罗和里约热内卢(巴西)牙科区域委员会注册的正畸医生发送了一份调查问卷,其中包括21个问题:6个与人口统计学数据有关,另外15个与去除残留树脂的两种方法(钻或钳)有关。153名专业人员寄回了调查问卷:44.7%的样本始终使用高速钻头去除残留树脂,28.7%使用低速钻头;61.3%使用灌洗。82.5%的正畸医师使用多层硬质合金钻头。12.4%的正畸医生经常使用钳子。39%的病例使用带Widia的树脂去除钳。使用高速的原因是工作时间较短,而选择钳子的原因是对牙齿珐琅质的损伤较小:结论:最常用的残留树脂去除方法是在高速冲洗下使用多层硬质合金毛刺,这是因为工作时间更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: The Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics publishes scientific research articles, significant reviews, clinical and technical case reports, brief communications, and other materials related to Orthodontics and Facial Orthopedics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信