{"title":"Comparison between solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with cystic changes using computed tomography.","authors":"Shuai Ren, Li-Chao Qian, Xiao-Jing Lv, Ying-Ying Cao, Marcus J Daniels, Zhong-Qiu Wang, Li-Na Song, Ying Tian","doi":"10.4329/wjr.v16.i6.211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas (SPN) share similar imaging findings with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with cystic changes (PDAC with cystic changes), which may result in unnecessary surgery.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the value of computed tomography (CT) in differentiation of SPN from PDAC with cystic changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical and imaging findings of 32 patients diagnosed with SPN and 14 patients diagnosed with PDAC exhibiting cystic changes, confirmed through pathological diagnosis. Quantitative and qualitative analysis was performed, including assessment of age, sex, tumor size, shape, margin, density, enhancement pattern, CT values of tumors, CT contrast enhancement ratios, \"floating cloud sign,\" calcification, main pancreatic duct dilatation, pancreatic atrophy, and peripancreatic invasion or distal metastasis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify relevant features to differentiate between SPN and PDAC with cystic changes, and receiver operating characteristic curves were obtained to evaluate the diagnostic performance of each variable and their combination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When compared to PDAC with cystic changes, SPN had a lower age (32 years <i>vs</i> 64 years, <i>P</i> < 0.05) and a slightly larger size (5.41 cm <i>vs</i> 3.90 cm, <i>P</i> < 0.05). SPN had a higher frequency of \"floating cloud sign\" and peripancreatic invasion or distal metastasis than PDAC with cystic changes (both <i>P</i> < 0.05). No significant difference was found with respect to sex, tumor location, shape, margin, density, main pancreatic duct dilatation, calcification, pancreatic atrophy, enhancement pattern, CT values of tumors, or CT contrast enhancement ratios between the two groups (all <i>P ></i> 0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the combination was 0.833 (95% confidence interval: 0.708-0.957) with 78.6% sensitivity, 81.3% specificity, and 80.4% accuracy in differentiation of SPN from PDAC with cystic changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A larger tumor size, \"floating cloud sign,\" and peripancreatic invasion or distal metastasis are useful CT imaging features that are more common in SPN and may help discriminate SPN from PDAC with cystic changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23819,"journal":{"name":"World journal of radiology","volume":"16 6","pages":"211-220"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11229942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v16.i6.211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas (SPN) share similar imaging findings with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with cystic changes (PDAC with cystic changes), which may result in unnecessary surgery.
Aim: To investigate the value of computed tomography (CT) in differentiation of SPN from PDAC with cystic changes.
Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical and imaging findings of 32 patients diagnosed with SPN and 14 patients diagnosed with PDAC exhibiting cystic changes, confirmed through pathological diagnosis. Quantitative and qualitative analysis was performed, including assessment of age, sex, tumor size, shape, margin, density, enhancement pattern, CT values of tumors, CT contrast enhancement ratios, "floating cloud sign," calcification, main pancreatic duct dilatation, pancreatic atrophy, and peripancreatic invasion or distal metastasis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify relevant features to differentiate between SPN and PDAC with cystic changes, and receiver operating characteristic curves were obtained to evaluate the diagnostic performance of each variable and their combination.
Results: When compared to PDAC with cystic changes, SPN had a lower age (32 years vs 64 years, P < 0.05) and a slightly larger size (5.41 cm vs 3.90 cm, P < 0.05). SPN had a higher frequency of "floating cloud sign" and peripancreatic invasion or distal metastasis than PDAC with cystic changes (both P < 0.05). No significant difference was found with respect to sex, tumor location, shape, margin, density, main pancreatic duct dilatation, calcification, pancreatic atrophy, enhancement pattern, CT values of tumors, or CT contrast enhancement ratios between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the combination was 0.833 (95% confidence interval: 0.708-0.957) with 78.6% sensitivity, 81.3% specificity, and 80.4% accuracy in differentiation of SPN from PDAC with cystic changes.
Conclusion: A larger tumor size, "floating cloud sign," and peripancreatic invasion or distal metastasis are useful CT imaging features that are more common in SPN and may help discriminate SPN from PDAC with cystic changes.