Central nervous system active medication use in Medicare enrollees receiving home health care: association with chronic pain and anxiety level.

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
PAIN® Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003331
Mukaila A Raji, Rohan Shah, Jordan R Westra, Yong-Fang Kuo
{"title":"Central nervous system active medication use in Medicare enrollees receiving home health care: association with chronic pain and anxiety level.","authors":"Mukaila A Raji, Rohan Shah, Jordan R Westra, Yong-Fang Kuo","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>No comparative effectiveness data exist on nonopioid analgesics and nonbenzodiazepine anxiolytics to treat pain with anxiety. We examined the relationship between drug class and central nervous system (CNS) active drug polypharmacy on pain and anxiety levels in Medicare enrollees receiving home health (HH) care. This retrospective cohort study included enrollees with diagnoses and 2+ assessments of pain and anxiety between HH admission and discharge. Three sets of linear regression difference-in-reduction analyses assessed the association of pain or anxiety reduction with number of drugs; drug type; and drug combinations in those with daily pain and daily anxiety. Logistic regression analysis assessed the effect of medication number and class on less-than-daily pain or anxiety at HH discharge. A sensitivity analysis using multinomial regression was conducted with a three-level improvement to further determine clinical significance. Of 85,403 HH patients, 43% received opioids, 27% benzodiazepines, 26% gabapentinoids, 32% selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and 8% serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI). Furthermore, 75% had depression, 40% had substance use disorder diagnoses, and 6.9% had PTSD diagnoses. At HH admission, 83%, 35%, and 30% of patients reported daily pain, daily anxiety, and both, respectively. Central nervous system polypharmacy was associated with worse pain control and had no significant effect on anxiety. For patients with daily pain plus anxiety, pain was best reduced with one medication or any drug combination without opioid/benzodiazepine; anxiety was best reduced with combinations other than opiate/benzodiazepine. Gabapentinoids or SNRI achieved clinically meaningful pain control. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors provided clinically meaningful anxiety relief.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":" ","pages":"123-129"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAIN®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003331","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: No comparative effectiveness data exist on nonopioid analgesics and nonbenzodiazepine anxiolytics to treat pain with anxiety. We examined the relationship between drug class and central nervous system (CNS) active drug polypharmacy on pain and anxiety levels in Medicare enrollees receiving home health (HH) care. This retrospective cohort study included enrollees with diagnoses and 2+ assessments of pain and anxiety between HH admission and discharge. Three sets of linear regression difference-in-reduction analyses assessed the association of pain or anxiety reduction with number of drugs; drug type; and drug combinations in those with daily pain and daily anxiety. Logistic regression analysis assessed the effect of medication number and class on less-than-daily pain or anxiety at HH discharge. A sensitivity analysis using multinomial regression was conducted with a three-level improvement to further determine clinical significance. Of 85,403 HH patients, 43% received opioids, 27% benzodiazepines, 26% gabapentinoids, 32% selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and 8% serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI). Furthermore, 75% had depression, 40% had substance use disorder diagnoses, and 6.9% had PTSD diagnoses. At HH admission, 83%, 35%, and 30% of patients reported daily pain, daily anxiety, and both, respectively. Central nervous system polypharmacy was associated with worse pain control and had no significant effect on anxiety. For patients with daily pain plus anxiety, pain was best reduced with one medication or any drug combination without opioid/benzodiazepine; anxiety was best reduced with combinations other than opiate/benzodiazepine. Gabapentinoids or SNRI achieved clinically meaningful pain control. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors provided clinically meaningful anxiety relief.

接受家庭医疗护理的医疗保险参保者中枢神经系统活性药物的使用情况:与慢性疼痛和焦虑程度的关系。
摘要:目前还没有关于非阿片类镇痛药和非苯二氮卓类抗焦虑药治疗疼痛伴焦虑的比较效果数据。我们研究了在接受家庭医疗(HH)护理的医疗保险参保者中,药物类别和中枢神经系统(CNS)活性药物的多重药理作用与疼痛和焦虑水平之间的关系。这项回顾性队列研究纳入了在入院和出院期间诊断出疼痛和焦虑并进行过 2 次以上评估的参保者。三组线性回归差异减少分析评估了每日疼痛和每日焦虑患者的疼痛或焦虑减少与药物数量、药物类型和药物组合的关系。逻辑回归分析评估了药物数量和类别对 HH 出院时疼痛或焦虑少于每日次数的影响。为了进一步确定临床意义,我们使用多项式回归进行了三级改进的敏感性分析。在 85,403 名 HH 患者中,43% 接受了阿片类药物治疗,27% 接受了苯二氮卓类药物治疗,26% 接受了加巴喷丁类药物治疗,32% 接受了选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂治疗,8% 接受了血清素和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂 (SNRI)治疗。此外,75%的人患有抑郁症,40%的人被诊断患有药物使用障碍,6.9%的人被诊断患有创伤后应激障碍。入院时,分别有83%、35%和30%的患者报告有日常疼痛、日常焦虑和两者兼有的情况。中枢神经系统多药治疗与疼痛控制较差有关,但对焦虑没有显著影响。对于每日疼痛并伴有焦虑的患者,使用一种药物或任何不含阿片类/苯二氮卓类药物的联合用药减轻疼痛的效果最好;使用阿片类/苯二氮卓类药物以外的联合用药减轻焦虑的效果最好。加巴喷丁类药物或 SNRI 可实现有临床意义的疼痛控制。选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂可在临床上有效缓解焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PAIN®
PAIN® 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: PAIN® is the official publication of the International Association for the Study of Pain and publishes original research on the nature,mechanisms and treatment of pain.PAIN® provides a forum for the dissemination of research in the basic and clinical sciences of multidisciplinary interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信