Developing a deep learning model for predicting ovarian cancer in Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Ultrasound (O-RADS US) Category 4 lesions: A multicenter study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Wenting Xie, Wenjie Lin, Ping Li, Hongwei Lai, Zhilan Wang, Peizhong Liu, Yijun Huang, Yao Liu, Lina Tang, Guorong Lyu
{"title":"Developing a deep learning model for predicting ovarian cancer in Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Ultrasound (O-RADS US) Category 4 lesions: A multicenter study.","authors":"Wenting Xie, Wenjie Lin, Ping Li, Hongwei Lai, Zhilan Wang, Peizhong Liu, Yijun Huang, Yao Liu, Lina Tang, Guorong Lyu","doi":"10.1007/s00432-024-05872-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a deep learning (DL) model for differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian tumors of Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Ultrasound (O-RADS US) Category 4 lesions, and validate its diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 1619 US images obtained from three centers from December 2014 to March 2023. DeepLabV3 and YOLOv8 were jointly used to segment, classify, and detect ovarian tumors. Precision and recall and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were employed to assess the model performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 519 patients (including 269 benign and 250 malignant masses) were enrolled in the study. The number of women included in the training, validation, and test cohorts was 426, 46, and 47, respectively. The detection models exhibited an average precision of 98.68% (95% CI: 0.95-0.99) for benign masses and 96.23% (95% CI: 0.92-0.98) for malignant masses. Moreover, in the training set, the AUC was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.97), whereas in the validation set, the AUC was 0.93(95% CI: 0.89-0.94) and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96) in the test set. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values for the training set were 0.943,0.957,0.951,0.966, and 0.936, respectively, whereas those for the validation set were 0.905,0.935, 0.935,0.919, and 0.931, respectively. In addition, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the test set were 0.925, 0.955, 0.941, 0.956, and 0.927, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The constructed DL model exhibited high diagnostic performance in distinguishing benign and malignant ovarian tumors in O-RADS US category 4 lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11233367/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-024-05872-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a deep learning (DL) model for differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian tumors of Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Ultrasound (O-RADS US) Category 4 lesions, and validate its diagnostic performance.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 1619 US images obtained from three centers from December 2014 to March 2023. DeepLabV3 and YOLOv8 were jointly used to segment, classify, and detect ovarian tumors. Precision and recall and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were employed to assess the model performance.

Results: A total of 519 patients (including 269 benign and 250 malignant masses) were enrolled in the study. The number of women included in the training, validation, and test cohorts was 426, 46, and 47, respectively. The detection models exhibited an average precision of 98.68% (95% CI: 0.95-0.99) for benign masses and 96.23% (95% CI: 0.92-0.98) for malignant masses. Moreover, in the training set, the AUC was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.97), whereas in the validation set, the AUC was 0.93(95% CI: 0.89-0.94) and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96) in the test set. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values for the training set were 0.943,0.957,0.951,0.966, and 0.936, respectively, whereas those for the validation set were 0.905,0.935, 0.935,0.919, and 0.931, respectively. In addition, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the test set were 0.925, 0.955, 0.941, 0.956, and 0.927, respectively.

Conclusion: The constructed DL model exhibited high diagnostic performance in distinguishing benign and malignant ovarian tumors in O-RADS US category 4 lesions.

Abstract Image

开发用于预测卵巢-附件报告和数据系统超声(O-RADS US)第 4 类病变中卵巢癌的深度学习模型:一项多中心研究。
目的:开发一种深度学习(DL)模型,用于区分卵巢-附件报告和数据系统超声(O-RADS US)第4类病变的良性和恶性卵巢肿瘤,并验证其诊断性能:方法:对2014年12月至2023年3月期间从三个中心获得的1619张US图像进行回顾性分析。联合使用 DeepLabV3 和 YOLOv8 对卵巢肿瘤进行分割、分类和检测。采用精确度、召回率和接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)来评估模型性能:共有 519 名患者(包括 269 个良性肿块和 250 个恶性肿块)参与了研究。训练组、验证组和测试组的女性人数分别为 426 人、46 人和 47 人。检测模型对良性肿块的平均精确度为 98.68%(95% CI:0.95-0.99),对恶性肿块的平均精确度为 96.23%(95% CI:0.92-0.98)。此外,训练集的AUC为0.96(95% CI:0.94-0.97),而验证集的AUC为0.93(95% CI:0.89-0.94),测试集的AUC为0.95(95% CI:0.91-0.96)。训练集的灵敏度、特异性、准确度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 0.943、0.957、0.951、0.966 和 0.936,而验证集的灵敏度、特异性、准确度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 0.905、0.935、0.935、0.919 和 0.931。此外,测试集的灵敏度、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 0.925、0.955、0.941、0.956 和 0.927:所构建的 DL 模型在区分 O-RADS US 第 4 类病变的良性和恶性卵巢肿瘤方面表现出很高的诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
577
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology" publishes significant and up-to-date articles within the fields of experimental and clinical oncology. The journal, which is chiefly devoted to Original papers, also includes Reviews as well as Editorials and Guest editorials on current, controversial topics. The section Letters to the editors provides a forum for a rapid exchange of comments and information concerning previously published papers and topics of current interest. Meeting reports provide current information on the latest results presented at important congresses. The following fields are covered: carcinogenesis - etiology, mechanisms; molecular biology; recent developments in tumor therapy; general diagnosis; laboratory diagnosis; diagnostic and experimental pathology; oncologic surgery; and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信