Optical coherence tomography homography for detection of retinal displacement: a validation study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Koby Brosh, Eduardo Roditi, Aditya Bansal, Isabela Martins Melo, Michael J Potter, Rajeev H Muni
{"title":"Optical coherence tomography homography for detection of retinal displacement: a validation study.","authors":"Koby Brosh, Eduardo Roditi, Aditya Bansal, Isabela Martins Melo, Michael J Potter, Rajeev H Muni","doi":"10.1007/s00417-024-06555-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Retinal displacement following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) has been associated with inferior functional outcomes. Recent evidence using an overlay technique suggests that fundus-autofluorescence underestimates post-RRD repair retinal displacement. This study aims to validate the overlay technique in normal eyes and to determine its sensitivity and specificity at detecting retinal displacement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective case series involving 66 normal eyes, each with at least two separate infrared (IR) images at different time points. Overlay of the two images was based on manual marking of choroidal and optic nerve head (ONH) landmarks. For each set of two IR images, computer code for homography generated two outputs, flipping view video and an overlay picture. First, validation of choroidal/ONH alignment was performed using the flipping view video to ensure accurate manual markings. Then, two different masked graders (AB + IM) evaluated the overlays for presence of retinal displacement. 16 control eyes following RRD repair with detected retinal displacement on FAF imaging assessed sensitivity and specificity of the technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>94% of overlays were found to be well aligned (62/66). 11 cases exhibited errors on flipping view analysis (choroidal/ONH misalignment). Those 11 cases had a significantly higher rate of retinal displacement (false positives) compared to cases without errors (8/11,72% Vs 54/55,98%,P = 0.001). Sensitivity and specificity of the overlay technique for detecting retinal displacement considering only adequate flipping view cases (n = 55) were calculated as 100% and 98%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IR overlay emerges as a reliable and valid method for detecting retinal displacement, exhibiting excellent sensitivity and specificity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12795,"journal":{"name":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"3797-3804"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11608164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-024-06555-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Retinal displacement following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) has been associated with inferior functional outcomes. Recent evidence using an overlay technique suggests that fundus-autofluorescence underestimates post-RRD repair retinal displacement. This study aims to validate the overlay technique in normal eyes and to determine its sensitivity and specificity at detecting retinal displacement.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective case series involving 66 normal eyes, each with at least two separate infrared (IR) images at different time points. Overlay of the two images was based on manual marking of choroidal and optic nerve head (ONH) landmarks. For each set of two IR images, computer code for homography generated two outputs, flipping view video and an overlay picture. First, validation of choroidal/ONH alignment was performed using the flipping view video to ensure accurate manual markings. Then, two different masked graders (AB + IM) evaluated the overlays for presence of retinal displacement. 16 control eyes following RRD repair with detected retinal displacement on FAF imaging assessed sensitivity and specificity of the technique.

Results: 94% of overlays were found to be well aligned (62/66). 11 cases exhibited errors on flipping view analysis (choroidal/ONH misalignment). Those 11 cases had a significantly higher rate of retinal displacement (false positives) compared to cases without errors (8/11,72% Vs 54/55,98%,P = 0.001). Sensitivity and specificity of the overlay technique for detecting retinal displacement considering only adequate flipping view cases (n = 55) were calculated as 100% and 98%, respectively.

Conclusions: IR overlay emerges as a reliable and valid method for detecting retinal displacement, exhibiting excellent sensitivity and specificity.

Abstract Image

用于检测视网膜移位的光学相干断层同色成像:一项验证研究。
目的:流变性视网膜脱离(RRD)后视网膜移位与功能性预后较差有关。最近使用叠加技术的证据表明,眼底自动荧光低估了 RRD 修复后的视网膜移位。本研究旨在验证正常眼的叠加技术,并确定其检测视网膜移位的敏感性和特异性:我们进行了一项回顾性病例系列研究,涉及 66 只正常眼睛,每只眼睛在不同时间点至少有两张独立的红外(IR)图像。两张图像的叠加是基于脉络膜和视神经头(ONH)地标的手动标记。对于每组两张红外图像,计算机同源代码会生成两个输出结果,即翻转视图视频和叠加图片。首先,使用翻转视图视频对脉络膜/视神经头对齐情况进行验证,以确保手动标记的准确性。然后,由两名不同的蒙面分级员(AB + IM)评估叠加图是否存在视网膜移位。16 只进行 RRD 修复的对照眼在 FAF 成像上检测到视网膜移位,以评估该技术的敏感性和特异性:结果:94%的重叠片对齐良好(62/66)。11例在翻转视图分析中出现错误(脉络膜/视网膜不对齐)。与没有错误的病例相比,这 11 例病例的视网膜移位率(假阳性)明显更高(8/11,72% Vs 54/55,98%,P = 0.001)。仅考虑足够的翻转视图病例(n = 55),计算得出叠加技术检测视网膜移位的灵敏度和特异度分别为 100%和 98%:红外叠加是检测视网膜移位的一种可靠有效的方法,具有极高的灵敏度和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
398
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Graefe''s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology is a distinguished international journal that presents original clinical reports and clini-cally relevant experimental studies. Founded in 1854 by Albrecht von Graefe to serve as a source of useful clinical information and a stimulus for discussion, the journal has published articles by leading ophthalmologists and vision research scientists for more than a century. With peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Graefe''s Archive provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related experimental information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信