AI for detection, classification and prediction of loss of alignment of distal radius fractures; a systematic review.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Koen D Oude Nijhuis, Lente H M Dankelman, Jort P Wiersma, Britt Barvelink, Frank F A IJpma, Michael H J Verhofstad, Job N Doornberg, Joost W Colaris, Mathieu M E Wijffels
{"title":"AI for detection, classification and prediction of loss of alignment of distal radius fractures; a systematic review.","authors":"Koen D Oude Nijhuis, Lente H M Dankelman, Jort P Wiersma, Britt Barvelink, Frank F A IJpma, Michael H J Verhofstad, Job N Doornberg, Joost W Colaris, Mathieu M E Wijffels","doi":"10.1007/s00068-024-02557-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Early and accurate assessment of distal radius fractures (DRFs) is crucial for optimal prognosis. Identifying fractures likely to lose threshold alignment (instability) in a cast is vital for treatment decisions, yet prediction tools' accuracy and reliability remain challenging. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), can evaluate radiographic images with high performance. This systematic review aims to summarize studies utilizing CNNs to detect, classify, or predict loss of threshold alignment of DRFs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was performed according to the PRISMA. Studies were eligible when the use of AI for the detection, classification, or prediction of loss of threshold alignment was analyzed. Quality assessment was done with a modified version of the methodologic index for non-randomized studies (MINORS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 576 identified studies, 15 were included. On fracture detection, studies reported sensitivity and specificity ranging from 80 to 99% and 73-100%, respectively; the AUC ranged from 0.87 to 0.99; the accuracy varied from 82 to 99%. The accuracy of fracture classification ranged from 60 to 81% and the AUC from 0.59 to 0.84. No studies focused on predicting loss of thresholds alignement of DRFs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI models for DRF detection show promising performance, indicating the potential of algorithms to assist clinicians in the assessment of radiographs. In addition, AI models showed similar performance compared to clinicians. No algorithms for predicting the loss of threshold alignment were identified in our literature search despite the clinical relevance of such algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02557-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Early and accurate assessment of distal radius fractures (DRFs) is crucial for optimal prognosis. Identifying fractures likely to lose threshold alignment (instability) in a cast is vital for treatment decisions, yet prediction tools' accuracy and reliability remain challenging. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), can evaluate radiographic images with high performance. This systematic review aims to summarize studies utilizing CNNs to detect, classify, or predict loss of threshold alignment of DRFs.

Methods: A literature search was performed according to the PRISMA. Studies were eligible when the use of AI for the detection, classification, or prediction of loss of threshold alignment was analyzed. Quality assessment was done with a modified version of the methodologic index for non-randomized studies (MINORS).

Results: Of the 576 identified studies, 15 were included. On fracture detection, studies reported sensitivity and specificity ranging from 80 to 99% and 73-100%, respectively; the AUC ranged from 0.87 to 0.99; the accuracy varied from 82 to 99%. The accuracy of fracture classification ranged from 60 to 81% and the AUC from 0.59 to 0.84. No studies focused on predicting loss of thresholds alignement of DRFs.

Conclusion: AI models for DRF detection show promising performance, indicating the potential of algorithms to assist clinicians in the assessment of radiographs. In addition, AI models showed similar performance compared to clinicians. No algorithms for predicting the loss of threshold alignment were identified in our literature search despite the clinical relevance of such algorithms.

Abstract Image

用于检测、分类和预测桡骨远端骨折失准的人工智能;系统综述。
目的:早期准确评估桡骨远端骨折(DRF)对优化预后至关重要。在石膏模型中识别可能失去阈值对位(不稳定性)的骨折对治疗决策至关重要,但预测工具的准确性和可靠性仍面临挑战。人工智能(AI),尤其是卷积神经网络(CNN),可以对放射影像进行高性能评估。本系统性综述旨在总结利用 CNN 检测、分类或预测 DRF 门限对齐损失的研究:方法:根据 PRISMA 进行文献检索。只要对使用人工智能检测、分类或预测阈值失准的研究进行了分析,就符合条件。质量评估采用修改版的非随机研究方法指数(MINORS):结果:在已确定的 576 项研究中,有 15 项被纳入。在骨折检测方面,研究报告的灵敏度和特异度分别为 80% 至 99% 和 73% 至 100%;AUC 为 0.87 至 0.99;准确度为 82% 至 99%。骨折分类的准确率为 60% 到 81%,AUC 为 0.59 到 0.84。没有研究侧重于预测 DRF 的阈值对齐损失:用于 DRF 检测的人工智能模型显示出良好的性能,表明算法在协助临床医生评估放射照片方面具有潜力。此外,与临床医生相比,人工智能模型显示出相似的性能。在我们的文献检索中,没有发现用于预测阈值对齐损失的算法,尽管此类算法与临床息息相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信