Nile tilapia and gilthead seabream dietary self-selection of alternative feeds.

IF 2.5 3区 农林科学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Fish Physiology and Biochemistry Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1007/s10695-024-01373-y
Rodrigo Mendes, Luís E C Conceição, Jorge Dias, Sofia Engrola, Francisco J Sánchez-Vázquez
{"title":"Nile tilapia and gilthead seabream dietary self-selection of alternative feeds.","authors":"Rodrigo Mendes, Luís E C Conceição, Jorge Dias, Sofia Engrola, Francisco J Sánchez-Vázquez","doi":"10.1007/s10695-024-01373-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Classical assessments of new fish feeds are anthropocentric, focusing mainly on growth. Although this methodology is accurate, it does not consider the fish' perspective. This study aimed to investigate the behavioural responses and feed preferences of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) through a self-selection trial using self-feeders. Both species were offered three feeds: a control (PD) commercial-like feed and two diets (ORG1 and ORG2) formulated with different inclusions of alternative ingredients to address some of the current environmental concerns and/or ethical issues often associated with commercial formulations. Three groups of tilapia with an average weight of 163.0 g ± 4.3 g (mean ± SD) and four groups of seabreams with 174.7 g ± 27.0 g were tested. Tilapia exhibited a preference for ORG2 (46.5%), influenced by the sensory properties of the feed and post-ingestion signals. Seabream did not show a preference for any feed. These findings highlight the effectiveness of self-selection experiments in allowing fish to express their feeding behaviour and preferences. Therefore, this approach should be considered in the initial screening and design of new aquaculture feeds and ingredients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12274,"journal":{"name":"Fish Physiology and Biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":"1849-1860"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11286691/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish Physiology and Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-024-01373-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Classical assessments of new fish feeds are anthropocentric, focusing mainly on growth. Although this methodology is accurate, it does not consider the fish' perspective. This study aimed to investigate the behavioural responses and feed preferences of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) through a self-selection trial using self-feeders. Both species were offered three feeds: a control (PD) commercial-like feed and two diets (ORG1 and ORG2) formulated with different inclusions of alternative ingredients to address some of the current environmental concerns and/or ethical issues often associated with commercial formulations. Three groups of tilapia with an average weight of 163.0 g ± 4.3 g (mean ± SD) and four groups of seabreams with 174.7 g ± 27.0 g were tested. Tilapia exhibited a preference for ORG2 (46.5%), influenced by the sensory properties of the feed and post-ingestion signals. Seabream did not show a preference for any feed. These findings highlight the effectiveness of self-selection experiments in allowing fish to express their feeding behaviour and preferences. Therefore, this approach should be considered in the initial screening and design of new aquaculture feeds and ingredients.

Abstract Image

尼罗罗非鱼和金头鲷对替代饲料的膳食自我选择。
对新鱼饲料的传统评估以人类为中心,主要关注生长。尽管这种方法是准确的,但却没有考虑到鱼类的角度。本研究旨在通过使用自我喂食器进行自我选择试验,调查尼罗罗非鱼(Oreochromis niloticus)和金头鲷(Sparus aurata)的行为反应和对饲料的偏好。这两种鱼都提供了三种饲料:一种类似商业饲料的对照组(PD)和两种含有不同替代成分的日粮(ORG1 和 ORG2),以解决目前与商业配方相关的一些环境问题和/或道德问题。测试了三组平均体重为 163.0 g ± 4.3 g(平均值 ± SD)的罗非鱼和四组平均体重为 174.7 g ± 27.0 g 的鲷鱼。受饲料感官特性和消化后信号的影响,罗非鱼表现出对 ORG2 的偏好(46.5%)。鲷鱼对任何饲料都没有表现出偏好。这些发现凸显了自我选择实验在允许鱼类表达其摄食行为和偏好方面的有效性。因此,在初步筛选和设计新的水产养殖饲料和配料时应考虑这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fish Physiology and Biochemistry
Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 农林科学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.90%
发文量
106
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Fish Physiology and Biochemistry is an international journal publishing original research papers in all aspects of the physiology and biochemistry of fishes. Coverage includes experimental work in such topics as biochemistry of organisms, organs, tissues and cells; structure of organs, tissues, cells and organelles related to their function; nutritional, osmotic, ionic, respiratory and excretory homeostasis; nerve and muscle physiology; endocrinology; reproductive physiology; energetics; biochemical and physiological effects of toxicants; molecular biology and biotechnology and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信