Exhaled volatile organic compounds in the detection of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.8 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
EXCLI Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.17179/excli2024-7042
Daniah Alsaadi, Nicolle Clements, Natiya Gabuniya, Nader Francis, Manish Chand
{"title":"Exhaled volatile organic compounds in the detection of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Daniah Alsaadi, Nicolle Clements, Natiya Gabuniya, Nader Francis, Manish Chand","doi":"10.17179/excli2024-7042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is an apparent need for novel non-invasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests that are more acceptable to patients and can reliably detect CRC or reduce the number of unnecessary colonoscopies performed in cancer-free patients. An emerging number of studies demonstrate the potential value of exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as a diagnostic and triaging test for CRC. A systematic appraisal and meta-analysis of the published evidence was done to determine whether exhaled VOCs can be used in the detection and screening of CRC. Nine electronic databases were searched from inception of the databases until August 2020. Quantitative and descriptive data of CRC patients and healthy control (HC) participants who underwent VOCs breath analysis was extracted. In addition, where possible, sampling methods, analytical platforms, processors, and specific breath biomarkers found in each study were recorded. Fourteen articles were included in the systematic review with 491 colorectal patients and 754 HC participants (n=1245). Sub-group meta-analysis was conducted on nine of those articles and the pooled sensitivity was estimated to be 0.89 (95 % CI = 0.80-0.99) whereas specificity was 0.83 (95 % CI = 0.74-0.92). Heterogeneity of pooled sensitivity and specificity was estimated as I<sup>2</sup>=11.11 %. Although this study was limited by small sample size and different analytical platforms, the proposed future framework resolves such limitations and standardizes future research. It is reasonable to deduce that VOCs breath analysis is certainly a field of research that can progress to replace traditional methods within the framework of CRC screening and diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12247,"journal":{"name":"EXCLI Journal","volume":"23 ","pages":"795-810"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11231457/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EXCLI Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17179/excli2024-7042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is an apparent need for novel non-invasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests that are more acceptable to patients and can reliably detect CRC or reduce the number of unnecessary colonoscopies performed in cancer-free patients. An emerging number of studies demonstrate the potential value of exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as a diagnostic and triaging test for CRC. A systematic appraisal and meta-analysis of the published evidence was done to determine whether exhaled VOCs can be used in the detection and screening of CRC. Nine electronic databases were searched from inception of the databases until August 2020. Quantitative and descriptive data of CRC patients and healthy control (HC) participants who underwent VOCs breath analysis was extracted. In addition, where possible, sampling methods, analytical platforms, processors, and specific breath biomarkers found in each study were recorded. Fourteen articles were included in the systematic review with 491 colorectal patients and 754 HC participants (n=1245). Sub-group meta-analysis was conducted on nine of those articles and the pooled sensitivity was estimated to be 0.89 (95 % CI = 0.80-0.99) whereas specificity was 0.83 (95 % CI = 0.74-0.92). Heterogeneity of pooled sensitivity and specificity was estimated as I2=11.11 %. Although this study was limited by small sample size and different analytical platforms, the proposed future framework resolves such limitations and standardizes future research. It is reasonable to deduce that VOCs breath analysis is certainly a field of research that can progress to replace traditional methods within the framework of CRC screening and diagnosis.

检测结直肠癌的呼出挥发性有机化合物:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目前显然需要一种新型的非侵入性结直肠癌(CRC)筛查检测方法,这种方法更容易被患者接受,并能可靠地检测出 CRC 或减少对无癌症患者进行不必要的结肠镜检查的次数。越来越多的研究表明,呼出的挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)具有作为 CRC 诊断和分流测试的潜在价值。我们对已发表的证据进行了系统评估和荟萃分析,以确定呼出的挥发性有机化合物是否可用于检测和筛查 CRC。从数据库建立之初到 2020 年 8 月,共检索了九个电子数据库。提取了接受 VOCs 呼气分析的 CRC 患者和健康对照(HC)参与者的定量和描述性数据。此外,在可能的情况下,还记录了每项研究中发现的采样方法、分析平台、处理器和特定呼气生物标记物。系统综述共纳入 14 篇文章,涉及 491 名结直肠癌患者和 754 名 HC 参与者(n=1245)。对其中九篇文章进行了分组荟萃分析,汇总灵敏度估计为 0.89(95 % CI = 0.80-0.99),特异性为 0.83(95 % CI = 0.74-0.92)。汇总灵敏度和特异性的异质性估计为 I2=11.11 %。虽然这项研究受到样本量小和分析平台不同的限制,但提出的未来框架解决了这些限制,并使未来的研究标准化。我们可以合理地推断,挥发性有机化合物呼气分析肯定是一个研究领域,可以在 CRC 筛查和诊断框架内取代传统方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EXCLI Journal
EXCLI Journal BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
65
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: EXCLI Journal publishes original research reports, authoritative reviews and case reports of experimental and clinical sciences. The journal is particularly keen to keep a broad view of science and technology, and therefore welcomes papers which bridge disciplines and may not suit the narrow specialism of other journals. Although the general emphasis is on biological sciences, studies from the following fields are explicitly encouraged (alphabetical order): aging research, behavioral sciences, biochemistry, cell biology, chemistry including analytical chemistry, clinical and preclinical studies, drug development, environmental health, ergonomics, forensic medicine, genetics, hepatology and gastroenterology, immunology, neurosciences, occupational medicine, oncology and cancer research, pharmacology, proteomics, psychiatric research, psychology, systems biology, toxicology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信