[Overview of intraocular lenses with optics for correcting presbyopia].

Die Ophthalmologie Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1007/s00347-024-02071-z
Gerd U Auffarth, Grzegorz Łabuz, Ramin Khoramnia, Timur M Yildirim
{"title":"[Overview of intraocular lenses with optics for correcting presbyopia].","authors":"Gerd U Auffarth, Grzegorz Łabuz, Ramin Khoramnia, Timur M Yildirim","doi":"10.1007/s00347-024-02071-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years intraocular lenses (IOLs) for correcting presbyopia have been significantly improved and diversified. There are currently many different IOL models based on a wide variety of optical designs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The wide variety of available IOL solutions to correct presbyopia can be challenging for surgeons and patients. In everyday practice, the question is which IOL is best for which patient.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This overview describes and categorizes the currently available implants. The respective optical properties are analyzed and clinical study results are discussed, in particular those evaluating visual performance and the occurrence of photic phenomena.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Monofocal-plus IOLs provide improved intermediate visual acuity with optimal distant visual acuity and minimal photic phenomena. Extended depth of field (EDoF) IOLs extend the depth of field through different optical principles and provide good distant and intermediate visual acuity. Trifocal lenses enable the greatest independence from spectacles at the price of a higher probability of dysphotopsia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The selection of the most suitable IOL for correction of presbyopia requires a balance between the patient's visual needs and possible side effects. An adequate knowledge of the currently available implants allows a patient-oriented selection of IOLs.</p>","PeriodicalId":72808,"journal":{"name":"Die Ophthalmologie","volume":" ","pages":"685-697"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Ophthalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-024-02071-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In recent years intraocular lenses (IOLs) for correcting presbyopia have been significantly improved and diversified. There are currently many different IOL models based on a wide variety of optical designs.

Objective: The wide variety of available IOL solutions to correct presbyopia can be challenging for surgeons and patients. In everyday practice, the question is which IOL is best for which patient.

Material and methods: This overview describes and categorizes the currently available implants. The respective optical properties are analyzed and clinical study results are discussed, in particular those evaluating visual performance and the occurrence of photic phenomena.

Results: Monofocal-plus IOLs provide improved intermediate visual acuity with optimal distant visual acuity and minimal photic phenomena. Extended depth of field (EDoF) IOLs extend the depth of field through different optical principles and provide good distant and intermediate visual acuity. Trifocal lenses enable the greatest independence from spectacles at the price of a higher probability of dysphotopsia.

Conclusion: The selection of the most suitable IOL for correction of presbyopia requires a balance between the patient's visual needs and possible side effects. An adequate knowledge of the currently available implants allows a patient-oriented selection of IOLs.

[用于矫正老花眼的光学眼内透镜概述]。
背景:近年来,用于矫正老花眼的眼内人工晶体(IOLs)得到了显著的改进和多样化。目前,基于各种光学设计的人工晶体型号繁多:用于矫正老花眼的人工晶体解决方案种类繁多,这对外科医生和患者来说都具有挑战性。在日常实践中,问题是哪种人工晶体最适合哪位患者:材料和方法:本概述对目前可用的植入物进行了描述和分类。材料与方法:本文概述了目前可用的人工晶体并对其进行了分类,分析了其各自的光学特性,并讨论了临床研究结果,特别是评估视觉性能和光现象发生的结果:结果:单焦加人工晶体提高了中间视力,并具有最佳的远距离视力和最小的光现象。扩展景深(EDoF)人工晶体通过不同的光学原理扩展景深,提供良好的远视力和中视力。三焦点人工晶体可以最大程度地摆脱眼镜的束缚,但其代价是出现视力障碍的概率较高:结论:选择最合适的人工晶体来矫正老花眼,需要在患者的视觉需求和可能的副作用之间取得平衡。充分了解目前可用的人工晶体后,就能以患者为导向选择人工晶体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信