Jiaping Wang, Shuang Yu, Shun Liu, Xue Liang, Shupeng Wang, Lin Li
{"title":"The Inflammatory Response and Long-Term Outcomes Between Open and Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy:A Propensity-Matched Single-Institution Study.","authors":"Jiaping Wang, Shuang Yu, Shun Liu, Xue Liang, Shupeng Wang, Lin Li","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> In recent years, although laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) has experienced rapid development both domestically and internationally, however, there are still varying opinions toward LPD. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> From January 2020 to July 2022, the data were collected. We compared the inflammatory response at various postoperative time points and evaluated long-term outcomes between the two groups. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In the early stage, the LPD group exhibited lower values of white blood cells, C-reactive protein, neutrophils, and platelets after surgery compared with open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) (<i>P</i> all<0.05). However, no statistically significant differences were observed in terms of procalcitonin, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio. Before propensity score matching, no statistical significance was observed between two groups, whether in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) (<i>P</i> = .406) or overall survival (OS) (<i>P</i> = .851). However, to further control for confounding factors, propensity score matching was used. The analysis revealed that DFS still showed no significant difference (<i>P</i> = .928), but, in the term of OS, a statistical significance was observed between the two groups. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> LPD demonstrates a comparable long-term outcomes to OPD and even slightly superior OS. Moreover, the LPD group exhibits a lower inflammatory response during early postoperative period.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: In recent years, although laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) has experienced rapid development both domestically and internationally, however, there are still varying opinions toward LPD. Methods: From January 2020 to July 2022, the data were collected. We compared the inflammatory response at various postoperative time points and evaluated long-term outcomes between the two groups. Results: In the early stage, the LPD group exhibited lower values of white blood cells, C-reactive protein, neutrophils, and platelets after surgery compared with open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) (P all<0.05). However, no statistically significant differences were observed in terms of procalcitonin, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio. Before propensity score matching, no statistical significance was observed between two groups, whether in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) (P = .406) or overall survival (OS) (P = .851). However, to further control for confounding factors, propensity score matching was used. The analysis revealed that DFS still showed no significant difference (P = .928), but, in the term of OS, a statistical significance was observed between the two groups. Conclusion: LPD demonstrates a comparable long-term outcomes to OPD and even slightly superior OS. Moreover, the LPD group exhibits a lower inflammatory response during early postoperative period.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.