Public transport use and mortality among older adults in England: A cohort study

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
{"title":"Public transport use and mortality among older adults in England: A cohort study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Background</em>: Most evidence on transport use and mortality has focused on the commute to work. This study aims to fill a gap by assessing relationships between public transport use and mortality among older adults. <em>Methods</em>: Data come from a cohort of 10,186 individuals aged 50 or older who participated in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), with survey data linked to mortality records over 16 years (2002–2018). We assessed a binary measure of public transport use and frequency of use from ‘every day or nearly every day’ to ‘never’. Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between public transport use and mortality. Analyses were adjusted for a range of covariates including socio-demographic factors, chronic disease, and self-reported problems with daily living activities. <em>Results</em>: Overall, 3371 participants (33.1%) died within the study period. Mortality was lower among public transport users (21.3%) compared with non-users (64.2%). Adjusted analyses found that users had 34% lower mortality than non-users (HR 0.66 (95% CI 0.61;0.71)). Adjusted analyses showed similar association sizes across frequencies of public transport use, with those using public transport every day or nearly every day having 41% lower mortality than never users (HR 0.59 (0.49;0.71)). Associations were similar among those with and without a longstanding illness. <em>Conclusion</em>: The use of public transport among older adults is linked to lower levels of mortality. Reductions in provision of public transport services could be detrimental to both transportation and population health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20339,"journal":{"name":"Preventive medicine","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 108064"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743524002196/pdfft?md5=fe9491d8227291b614fcbb4f23952576&pid=1-s2.0-S0091743524002196-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743524002196","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Most evidence on transport use and mortality has focused on the commute to work. This study aims to fill a gap by assessing relationships between public transport use and mortality among older adults. Methods: Data come from a cohort of 10,186 individuals aged 50 or older who participated in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), with survey data linked to mortality records over 16 years (2002–2018). We assessed a binary measure of public transport use and frequency of use from ‘every day or nearly every day’ to ‘never’. Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between public transport use and mortality. Analyses were adjusted for a range of covariates including socio-demographic factors, chronic disease, and self-reported problems with daily living activities. Results: Overall, 3371 participants (33.1%) died within the study period. Mortality was lower among public transport users (21.3%) compared with non-users (64.2%). Adjusted analyses found that users had 34% lower mortality than non-users (HR 0.66 (95% CI 0.61;0.71)). Adjusted analyses showed similar association sizes across frequencies of public transport use, with those using public transport every day or nearly every day having 41% lower mortality than never users (HR 0.59 (0.49;0.71)). Associations were similar among those with and without a longstanding illness. Conclusion: The use of public transport among older adults is linked to lower levels of mortality. Reductions in provision of public transport services could be detrimental to both transportation and population health.

英格兰老年人使用公共交通工具与死亡率:一项队列研究。
背景:有关交通使用和死亡率的大多数证据都集中在上下班途中。本研究旨在通过评估老年人使用公共交通与死亡率之间的关系来填补这一空白:数据来自参与英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)的 10,186 名 50 岁及以上人群,调查数据与 16 年(2002-2018 年)的死亡记录相关联。我们对 "每天或几乎每天 "到 "从不 "的公共交通使用情况和使用频率进行了二元评估。我们使用 Cox 比例危险回归模型来估计公共交通使用与死亡率之间的危险比 (HRs),并得出 95% 的置信区间 (CIs)。分析对一系列协变量进行了调整,包括社会人口因素、慢性疾病和自我报告的日常生活活动问题:共有 3371 名参与者(33.1%)在研究期间死亡。公共交通使用者的死亡率(21.3%)低于非使用者(64.2%)。调整分析发现,使用公共交通者的死亡率比非使用者低 34%(HR 0.66 (95% CI 0.61;0.71))。调整后的分析表明,不同频率使用公共交通工具的人群之间的相关性大小相似,每天或几乎每天使用公共交通工具的人群的死亡率比从不使用公共交通工具的人群低 41% (HR 0.59 (0.49;0.71))。有长期疾病和没有长期疾病的人之间的相关性相似:结论:老年人使用公共交通与降低死亡率有关。减少公共交通服务的提供可能对交通和人口健康都不利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Preventive medicine
Preventive medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1972 by Ernst Wynder, Preventive Medicine is an international scholarly journal that provides prompt publication of original articles on the science and practice of disease prevention, health promotion, and public health policymaking. Preventive Medicine aims to reward innovation. It will favor insightful observational studies, thoughtful explorations of health data, unsuspected new angles for existing hypotheses, robust randomized controlled trials, and impartial systematic reviews. Preventive Medicine''s ultimate goal is to publish research that will have an impact on the work of practitioners of disease prevention and health promotion, as well as of related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信