The Procedures for Documenting Organizational Knowledge and Experiences: A Scoping Review.

Q2 Medicine
Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran Pub Date : 2024-03-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.47176/mjiri.38.33
Shiva Malgard, Sirous Panahi, Leila Nemati Anaraki, Shadi Asadzandi, Hossein Ghalavand
{"title":"The Procedures for Documenting Organizational Knowledge and Experiences: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Shiva Malgard, Sirous Panahi, Leila Nemati Anaraki, Shadi Asadzandi, Hossein Ghalavand","doi":"10.47176/mjiri.38.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The present study was motivated by issues with earlier studies on documenting knowledge and experiences. This scoping review investigates and maps the procedures for documenting organizational knowledge and experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, a scoping review was conducted. Data were obtained by searching PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, Embase, and Emerald Insight databases and Persian databases, such as Magiran, Noormags, and Ensani. The selected terms were searched using the Boolean AND/OR operators, phrases, parentheses, and truncations in the title, abstract, keywords, and text word fields. The inclusion criteria were resources relevant to the research question, studies in English and Persian, original research articles, and resources published between 2011 and 2022. Finally, 8 related papers were selected as the research population after screening records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review of the selected studies indicates that there have been different steps for documenting knowledge and experiences according to the subject's scope and the goals of the studies. The included articles revealed numerous steps for documentation-including planning, acquisition, registration, evaluation, submission, maintenance, publication, application, payment, and compensation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although a systematic mechanism for documenting knowledge and experience is essential, many processes and phases are offered for documentation. Therefore, a complete review that synthesizes and integrates past study findings must still be included. Several shortcomings in past research on documenting knowledge and expertise prompted the present study. The results of the present study can be of great use to managers and employees of various organizations in topics such as the creation of standards for documenting knowledge and experiences, organizational-structural planning in this field, and training on different documentation methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":18361,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11230601/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.38.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The present study was motivated by issues with earlier studies on documenting knowledge and experiences. This scoping review investigates and maps the procedures for documenting organizational knowledge and experiences.

Methods: Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, a scoping review was conducted. Data were obtained by searching PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, Embase, and Emerald Insight databases and Persian databases, such as Magiran, Noormags, and Ensani. The selected terms were searched using the Boolean AND/OR operators, phrases, parentheses, and truncations in the title, abstract, keywords, and text word fields. The inclusion criteria were resources relevant to the research question, studies in English and Persian, original research articles, and resources published between 2011 and 2022. Finally, 8 related papers were selected as the research population after screening records.

Results: The review of the selected studies indicates that there have been different steps for documenting knowledge and experiences according to the subject's scope and the goals of the studies. The included articles revealed numerous steps for documentation-including planning, acquisition, registration, evaluation, submission, maintenance, publication, application, payment, and compensation.

Conclusion: Although a systematic mechanism for documenting knowledge and experience is essential, many processes and phases are offered for documentation. Therefore, a complete review that synthesizes and integrates past study findings must still be included. Several shortcomings in past research on documenting knowledge and expertise prompted the present study. The results of the present study can be of great use to managers and employees of various organizations in topics such as the creation of standards for documenting knowledge and experiences, organizational-structural planning in this field, and training on different documentation methods.

记录组织知识和经验的程序:范围审查。
背景:本研究的起因是先前关于记录知识和经验的研究中存在的问题。本范围综述调查并描绘了记录组织知识和经验的程序:方法:按照 PRISMA(系统综述和元分析的首选报告项目)范围界定综述扩展指南(PRISMA-ScR),进行了范围界定综述。数据通过搜索 PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、ProQuest、Embase 和 Emerald Insight 数据库以及 Magiran、Noormags 和 Ensani 等波斯语数据库获得。所选术语在标题、摘要、关键词和文本字段中使用布尔 AND/OR 运算符、短语、括号和截断符进行检索。纳入标准是与研究问题相关的资源、英语和波斯语研究、原创研究文章以及 2011 年至 2022 年间发表的资源。最后,经过筛选,选出 8 篇相关论文作为研究对象:对所选研究的回顾表明,根据研究对象的范围和研究目标,记录知识和经验的步骤各不相同。收录的文章揭示了许多记录步骤,包括计划、获取、注册、评估、提交、维护、出版、应用、支付和补偿:尽管记录知识和经验的系统机制非常重要,但记录的过程和阶段却很多。因此,还必须对过去的研究成果进行综合和整合的全面回顾。过去关于记录知识和专业技能的研究存在一些不足,促使我们开展了本研究。本研究的结果对不同组织的管理者和员工有很大的帮助,如制定记录知识和经验的标准、该领域的组织结构规划以及不同记录方法的培训等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信