Effectiveness of digital health interventions for telemedicine/telehealth for managing blood pressure in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Atsushi Sakima, Yuya Akagi, Yuichi Akasaki, Takako Fujii, Tatsuya Haze, Fumiko Kawakami-Mori, Ken Kitajima, Yusuke Kobayashi, Tetsutaro Matayoshi, Takashi Sakaguchi, Masanobu Yamazato, Makiko Abe, Yusuke Ohya, Hisatomi Arima
{"title":"Effectiveness of digital health interventions for telemedicine/telehealth for managing blood pressure in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Atsushi Sakima, Yuya Akagi, Yuichi Akasaki, Takako Fujii, Tatsuya Haze, Fumiko Kawakami-Mori, Ken Kitajima, Yusuke Kobayashi, Tetsutaro Matayoshi, Takashi Sakaguchi, Masanobu Yamazato, Makiko Abe, Yusuke Ohya, Hisatomi Arima","doi":"10.1038/s41440-024-01792-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials or observational studies that compare digital health interventions (DHIs) for telemedicine/telehealth versus usual care for managing blood pressure (BP) in adults. We searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and IchuShi-Web, and used a random-effects meta-analysis of the weighted mean difference (MD) between the comparison groups to pool data from the included studies. The outcome included the pooled MD of office BP from baseline to each follow-up period. This meta-analysis considered 117 studies with 68677 participants as eligible. The 3-month intervention period reduced office systolic BP (SBP) compared with usual care in 38 studies (MD: -3.21 mmHg [95% confidence interval: -4.51 to -1.90]), with evidence of heterogeneity. Office SBP across intervention periods demonstrated comparable effects (3-, 6- [54 studies], 12- [43 studies], and >12-month periods [9 studies]). The benefits for office diastolic BP were similar to those for office SBP. Additionally, the interventions significantly reduced the office SBP compared with the control, regardless of the mode of intervention delivery (smartphone apps [38 studies], text messages [35 studies], and websites [34 studies]) or type of facility (medical [74 studies] vs. non-medical [33 studies]). The interventions were more effective in 41 hypertension cohorts compared with 66 non-hypertension cohorts (-4.81 mmHg [-6.33, -3.29] vs. -2.17 mmHg [-3.15, -1.19], P = 0.006 for heterogeneity). In conclusion, DHIs for telemedicine/telehealth improved BP management compared with usual care. The effectiveness with heterogeneity should be considered, as prudent for implementing evidence-based medicine. This meta-analysis considered 117 studies with 68677 participants eligible. The DHIs for telemedicine/telehealth reduced office BP compared with usual care, regardless of intervention duration, intervention delivery mode, facility type, and cohort type. Additionally, the DHIs reduced the risk of uncontrolled BP compared with usual care, regardless of intervention duration, intervention delivery mode, and facility type. BP blood pressure, DHI digital health intervention, MD mean difference, RR risk ratio, SBP systolic blood pressure.</p>","PeriodicalId":13029,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-024-01792-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials or observational studies that compare digital health interventions (DHIs) for telemedicine/telehealth versus usual care for managing blood pressure (BP) in adults. We searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and IchuShi-Web, and used a random-effects meta-analysis of the weighted mean difference (MD) between the comparison groups to pool data from the included studies. The outcome included the pooled MD of office BP from baseline to each follow-up period. This meta-analysis considered 117 studies with 68677 participants as eligible. The 3-month intervention period reduced office systolic BP (SBP) compared with usual care in 38 studies (MD: -3.21 mmHg [95% confidence interval: -4.51 to -1.90]), with evidence of heterogeneity. Office SBP across intervention periods demonstrated comparable effects (3-, 6- [54 studies], 12- [43 studies], and >12-month periods [9 studies]). The benefits for office diastolic BP were similar to those for office SBP. Additionally, the interventions significantly reduced the office SBP compared with the control, regardless of the mode of intervention delivery (smartphone apps [38 studies], text messages [35 studies], and websites [34 studies]) or type of facility (medical [74 studies] vs. non-medical [33 studies]). The interventions were more effective in 41 hypertension cohorts compared with 66 non-hypertension cohorts (-4.81 mmHg [-6.33, -3.29] vs. -2.17 mmHg [-3.15, -1.19], P = 0.006 for heterogeneity). In conclusion, DHIs for telemedicine/telehealth improved BP management compared with usual care. The effectiveness with heterogeneity should be considered, as prudent for implementing evidence-based medicine. This meta-analysis considered 117 studies with 68677 participants eligible. The DHIs for telemedicine/telehealth reduced office BP compared with usual care, regardless of intervention duration, intervention delivery mode, facility type, and cohort type. Additionally, the DHIs reduced the risk of uncontrolled BP compared with usual care, regardless of intervention duration, intervention delivery mode, and facility type. BP blood pressure, DHI digital health intervention, MD mean difference, RR risk ratio, SBP systolic blood pressure.

Abstract Image

远程医疗/远程保健的数字健康干预措施对成人血压管理的有效性:系统综述和荟萃分析。
本系统综述和荟萃分析纳入了比较远程医疗/远程保健的数字健康干预(DHIs)与常规护理对成人血压(BP)管理效果的随机对照试验或观察性研究。我们检索了 PubMed、Cochrane CENTRAL 和 IchuShi-Web,并使用随机效应荟萃分析法对比较组之间的加权平均差 (MD) 进行分析,以汇总纳入研究的数据。结果包括从基线到每个随访期的办公室血压的汇总 MD。本次荟萃分析共考虑了 117 项研究,68677 名参与者符合条件。在 38 项研究中,与常规护理相比,3 个月干预期可降低办公室收缩压(SBP)(MD:-3.21 mmHg [95% 置信区间:-4.51 至-1.90]),但存在异质性。不同干预期的办公室舒张压显示出相似的效果(3 个月、6 个月(54 项研究)、12 个月(43 项研究)和大于 12 个月(9 项研究))。办公室舒张压的获益与办公室降压的获益相似。此外,与对照组相比,无论采取何种干预方式(智能手机应用程序 [38 项研究]、短信 [35 项研究] 和网站 [34 项研究])或设施类型(医疗 [74 项研究] 与非医疗 [33 项研究]),干预措施都能显著降低诊室舒张压。与 66 项非高血压队列相比,41 项高血压队列中的干预措施更为有效(-4.81 mmHg [-6.33, -3.29] vs. -2.17 mmHg [-3.15, -1.19], P = 0.006(异质性))。总之,与常规护理相比,远程医疗/远程保健的 DHIs 可改善血压管理。在实施循证医学时,应谨慎考虑具有异质性的有效性。这项荟萃分析考虑了 117 项研究,共有 68677 名参与者符合条件。与常规护理相比,远程医疗/远程保健的 DHIs 可降低诊室血压,与干预持续时间、干预实施模式、设施类型和队列类型无关。此外,与常规护理相比,DHI 降低了血压失控的风险,与干预持续时间、干预实施模式和设施类型无关。BP 血压,DHI 数字健康干预,MD 平均差异,RR 风险比,SBP 收缩压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hypertension Research
Hypertension Research 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
249
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hypertension Research is the official publication of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. The journal publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular diseases. The journal publishes Review Articles, Articles, Correspondence and Comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信