Risk of Pancreatitis After Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
American Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-05 DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000002942
Patrick T Magahis, Ankit Chhoda, Tyler M Berzin, James J Farrell, Drew N Wright, Anam Rizvi, Mark Hanscom, David L Carr-Locke, Kartik Sampath, Reem Z Sharaiha, SriHari Mahadev
{"title":"Risk of Pancreatitis After Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Patrick T Magahis, Ankit Chhoda, Tyler M Berzin, James J Farrell, Drew N Wright, Anam Rizvi, Mark Hanscom, David L Carr-Locke, Kartik Sampath, Reem Z Sharaiha, SriHari Mahadev","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000002942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is frequently used to risk-stratify pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). Rising PCL incidence and developments in tissue acquisition and specimen analysis necessitate updated appraisal of EUS-FNA safety, particularly the risk of postprocedure pancreatitis, the most common EUS-FNA-related adverse event. Our systematic review aims to accurately quantify the risk of EUS-FNA-related pancreatitis to best inform decisions regarding EUS-FNA's optimal role in PCL workup.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed systematic searches in 4 databases from inception to April 2024 for original English-language studies investigating EUS-FNA-related pancreatitis. We extracted data on demographics and EUS-FNA-related pancreatitis risk, severity, and risk factors. These were meta-analyzed through the DerSimonian Laird Method using a random-effects model. Meta-regression of pancreatitis risk was performed to delineate associations with clinical and procedural characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four studies comprised 8,086 patients and reported 110 EUS-FNA-related pancreatitis events. Pooled risk of EUS-FNA-related pancreatitis was 1.4% (95% confidence intervals, -0.8% to 3.5%; I2 = 0.00), which was predominantly of mild severity (67%) and uniformly nonfatal. Pancreatitis risk lacked significant association with sample size, age, sex, cyst size, needle caliber, or passes, although we noted trends toward higher risk in studies published after 2015, those using higher gauge needles (19 G vs 22 G/25 G), and those performing EUS-guided through-the-needle biopsy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We note with high certainty that pancreatitis after EUS-FNA of PCLs is infrequent and mild in severity with no mortality in the included cohort. EUS-guided through-the-needle biopsy may serve as a significant risk factor for EUS-FNA-related pancreatitis risk; however, further studies are needed to delineate other predisposing characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"2174-2186"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000002942","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is frequently used to risk-stratify pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). Rising PCL incidence and developments in tissue acquisition and specimen analysis necessitate updated appraisal of EUS-FNA safety, particularly the risk of postprocedure pancreatitis, the most common EUS-FNA-related adverse event. Our systematic review aims to accurately quantify the risk of EUS-FNA-related pancreatitis to best inform decisions regarding EUS-FNA's optimal role in PCL workup.

Methods: We performed systematic searches in 4 databases from inception to April 2024 for original English-language studies investigating EUS-FNA-related pancreatitis. We extracted data on demographics and EUS-FNA-related pancreatitis risk, severity, and risk factors. These were meta-analyzed through the DerSimonian Laird Method using a random-effects model. Meta-regression of pancreatitis risk was performed to delineate associations with clinical and procedural characteristics.

Results: Sixty-four studies comprised 8,086 patients and reported 110 EUS-FNA-related pancreatitis events. Pooled risk of EUS-FNA-related pancreatitis was 1.4% (95% confidence intervals, -0.8% to 3.5%; I2 = 0.00), which was predominantly of mild severity (67%) and uniformly nonfatal. Pancreatitis risk lacked significant association with sample size, age, sex, cyst size, needle caliber, or passes, although we noted trends toward higher risk in studies published after 2015, those using higher gauge needles (19 G vs 22 G/25 G), and those performing EUS-guided through-the-needle biopsy.

Discussion: We note with high certainty that pancreatitis after EUS-FNA of PCLs is infrequent and mild in severity with no mortality in the included cohort. EUS-guided through-the-needle biopsy may serve as a significant risk factor for EUS-FNA-related pancreatitis risk; however, further studies are needed to delineate other predisposing characteristics.

内镜超声引导下胰腺囊性病变细针抽吸术后发生胰腺炎的风险:系统回顾与元分析》。
背景:内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术(EUS-FNA)常用于对胰腺囊性病变(PCL)进行风险分级。PCL 发病率的上升以及组织采集和标本分析的发展要求对 EUS-FNA 的安全性进行最新评估,尤其是术后胰腺炎的风险,这是 EUS-FNA 相关不良事件中最常见的一种。我们的系统性综述旨在准确量化 EUS-FNA 相关胰腺炎的风险,为 EUS-FNA 在 PCL 检查中的最佳作用提供最佳参考:我们在四个数据库中系统检索了从开始到 2024 年 4 月调查 EUS-FNA 相关胰腺炎的原始英文研究。我们提取了有关人口统计学、EUS-FNA 相关胰腺炎风险、严重程度和风险因素的数据。我们采用随机效应模型,通过 DerSimonian Laird 方法对这些数据进行了元分析。对胰腺炎风险进行了元回归,以确定与临床和手术特征的关联:64项研究包括8086名患者,报告了110起EUS-FNA相关胰腺炎事件。EUS-FNA 相关胰腺炎的汇总风险为 1.4% [95% CI, -0.8-3.5%; I2 = 0.00],主要为轻度(67%),且均不致命。胰腺炎风险与样本大小、年龄、性别、囊肿大小、针头口径或通过率无明显关联,但我们注意到2015年后发表的研究、使用较高规格针头(19G vs. 22G/25G)的研究以及进行EUS-TTNB的研究存在风险较高的趋势:我们非常肯定地注意到,在纳入的队列中,PCL 的 EUS-FNA 术后胰腺炎并不常见,且严重程度较轻,无死亡病例。EUS-TTNB可能是EUS-FNA相关胰腺炎风险的一个重要风险因素;但是,还需要进一步的研究来确定其他易感特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信