Gary M Reisfield, Scott A Teitelbaum, Joseph T Jones, Ben Lewis
{"title":"The effect of incidental ethanol exposures on the formation of blood phosphatidylethanol.","authors":"Gary M Reisfield, Scott A Teitelbaum, Joseph T Jones, Ben Lewis","doi":"10.1002/dta.3752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Blood phosphatidylethanol (PEth), a metabolite of ethanol, is emerging as a direct biomarker of choice for characterizing ethanol consumption in clinical, research, and forensic contexts. An accumulating body of evidence, and a recent international consensus conference, supports a cutoff of 20 μg/L of PEth (16:0/18:1) to distinguish abstinence from beverage ethanol consumption. There is a dearth of research, however, on whether exposures to nonbeverage ethanol sources are sufficient to produce PEth concentrations that exceed this cutoff. To explore this possibility, we recruited 30 participants, who indicated past-90-day abstinence from beverage alcohol, to characterize their past-30-day nonbeverage ethanol exposures (including source, frequency, and intensity of exposures) and to undergo PEth testing. Two of the 30 participants (6.7%) produced PEth concentrations ≥20 μg/L. One of these participants (PEth = 26 μg/L) reported multiple ethanol exposure sources, including near-daily intensive exposures to ethanol vapor. The other participant (PEth = 49 μg/L) reported only once-daily use of an ethanol-containing mouthwash; the veracity of his abstinence claim is refuted. The results of this study support a rebuttable presumption that PEth ≥20 μg/L is indicative of beverage ethanol consumption. They suggest, however, that intensive, incidental alcohol exposures have the potential, under unusual circumstances, to result in PEth concentrations that modestly exceed this threshold.</p>","PeriodicalId":160,"journal":{"name":"Drug Testing and Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Testing and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3752","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Blood phosphatidylethanol (PEth), a metabolite of ethanol, is emerging as a direct biomarker of choice for characterizing ethanol consumption in clinical, research, and forensic contexts. An accumulating body of evidence, and a recent international consensus conference, supports a cutoff of 20 μg/L of PEth (16:0/18:1) to distinguish abstinence from beverage ethanol consumption. There is a dearth of research, however, on whether exposures to nonbeverage ethanol sources are sufficient to produce PEth concentrations that exceed this cutoff. To explore this possibility, we recruited 30 participants, who indicated past-90-day abstinence from beverage alcohol, to characterize their past-30-day nonbeverage ethanol exposures (including source, frequency, and intensity of exposures) and to undergo PEth testing. Two of the 30 participants (6.7%) produced PEth concentrations ≥20 μg/L. One of these participants (PEth = 26 μg/L) reported multiple ethanol exposure sources, including near-daily intensive exposures to ethanol vapor. The other participant (PEth = 49 μg/L) reported only once-daily use of an ethanol-containing mouthwash; the veracity of his abstinence claim is refuted. The results of this study support a rebuttable presumption that PEth ≥20 μg/L is indicative of beverage ethanol consumption. They suggest, however, that intensive, incidental alcohol exposures have the potential, under unusual circumstances, to result in PEth concentrations that modestly exceed this threshold.
期刊介绍:
As the incidence of drugs escalates in 21st century living, their detection and analysis have become increasingly important. Sport, the workplace, crime investigation, homeland security, the pharmaceutical industry and the environment are just some of the high profile arenas in which analytical testing has provided an important investigative tool for uncovering the presence of extraneous substances.
In addition to the usual publishing fare of primary research articles, case reports and letters, Drug Testing and Analysis offers a unique combination of; ‘How to’ material such as ‘Tutorials’ and ‘Reviews’, Speculative pieces (‘Commentaries’ and ‘Perspectives'', providing a broader scientific and social context to the aspects of analytical testing), ‘Annual banned substance reviews’ (delivering a critical evaluation of the methods used in the characterization of established and newly outlawed compounds).
Rather than focus on the application of a single technique, Drug Testing and Analysis employs a unique multidisciplinary approach to the field of controversial compound determination. Papers discussing chromatography, mass spectrometry, immunological approaches, 1D/2D gel electrophoresis, to name just a few select methods, are welcomed where their application is related to any of the six key topics listed below.