Shwetha Mariadassou, Anne-Kathrin Klesse, Johannes Boegershausen
{"title":"Averse to what: Consumer aversion to algorithmic labels, but not their outputs?","authors":"Shwetha Mariadassou, Anne-Kathrin Klesse, Johannes Boegershausen","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Inspired by significant technical advancements, a rapidly growing stream of research explores human lay beliefs and reactions surrounding AI tools, which employ algorithms to mimic elements of human intelligence. This literature predominantly documents negative reactions to these tools or the underlying algorithms, often referred to as algorithm aversion or, alternatively, a preference for humans. This article proposes a third interpretation: people may be <em>averse</em> to their labels, but <em>appreciative</em> of their output. This perspective offers three core insights for how we study people's reactions to algorithms. Research would benefit from (1) carefully considering the labeling of AI tools, (2) broadening the scope of study to include interactions with these tools, and (3) accounting for their technical configuration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101839"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X24000526/pdfft?md5=eeac90e27a68d0fb411e03e6cc59a96d&pid=1-s2.0-S2352250X24000526-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X24000526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Inspired by significant technical advancements, a rapidly growing stream of research explores human lay beliefs and reactions surrounding AI tools, which employ algorithms to mimic elements of human intelligence. This literature predominantly documents negative reactions to these tools or the underlying algorithms, often referred to as algorithm aversion or, alternatively, a preference for humans. This article proposes a third interpretation: people may be averse to their labels, but appreciative of their output. This perspective offers three core insights for how we study people's reactions to algorithms. Research would benefit from (1) carefully considering the labeling of AI tools, (2) broadening the scope of study to include interactions with these tools, and (3) accounting for their technical configuration.
期刊介绍：
Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows.
Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include:
* Biological psychology
* Clinical psychology
* Cognitive psychology
* Community psychology
* Comparative psychology
* Developmental psychology
* Educational psychology
* Environmental psychology
* Evolutionary psychology
* Health psychology
* Neuropsychology
* Personality psychology
* Social psychology
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
