Reliability of PainDETECT for Evaluating Low Back Pain Caused by Cluneal Nerve Entrapment.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Chiho Takada, Kyongsong Kim, Rinko Kokubo, Minoru Ideguchi, Riku Mihara, Kenta Koketsu, Yasuo Murai
{"title":"Reliability of PainDETECT for Evaluating Low Back Pain Caused by Cluneal Nerve Entrapment.","authors":"Chiho Takada, Kyongsong Kim, Rinko Kokubo, Minoru Ideguchi, Riku Mihara, Kenta Koketsu, Yasuo Murai","doi":"10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2024_91-312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Superior/middle cluneal nerve entrapment (CN-E) is an elicitor of low back pain (LBP). The painDETECT questionnaire is used to characterize CN-E symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nineteen consecutive patients with LBP caused by CN-E (superior CN-E = 7; middle CN-E = 12) participated in a Japanese language painDETECT questionnaire survey before surgery. A score of 12 or lower was recorded as 'neuropathic component unlikely', a score of 19 or higher as 'neuropathic pain likely', and scores between 13 and 18 as 'neuropathic pain possible'. LBP severity was recorded on a numerical rating scale, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the EuroQol-5 dimension-5 level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean painDETECT score was 11.8 and did not significantly differ between the superior CN-E and middle CN-E groups. We classified low back pain as unlikely to have a neuropathic component in 13 patients, as likely to have a neuropathic component in 2 patients, and as possibly neuropathic in 4 patients. There was no significant difference in the pain level of patients with scores of ≤12 and ≥13 on painDETECT. All patients reported trigger pain; the positive rate was high for electric shock pain, radiating pain, and pain attacks and low for a burning or tingling sensation, pain elicited by a light touch, and pain caused by cold or hot stimulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The painDETECT questionnaire may not reliably identify LBP caused by superior/middle CN-E as neuropathic pain. A diagnosis of LBP due to CN-E must be made carefully because symptoms resemble nociceptive pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":56076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nippon Medical School","volume":"91 3","pages":"328-332"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nippon Medical School","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2024_91-312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Superior/middle cluneal nerve entrapment (CN-E) is an elicitor of low back pain (LBP). The painDETECT questionnaire is used to characterize CN-E symptoms.

Methods: Nineteen consecutive patients with LBP caused by CN-E (superior CN-E = 7; middle CN-E = 12) participated in a Japanese language painDETECT questionnaire survey before surgery. A score of 12 or lower was recorded as 'neuropathic component unlikely', a score of 19 or higher as 'neuropathic pain likely', and scores between 13 and 18 as 'neuropathic pain possible'. LBP severity was recorded on a numerical rating scale, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the EuroQol-5 dimension-5 level.

Results: The mean painDETECT score was 11.8 and did not significantly differ between the superior CN-E and middle CN-E groups. We classified low back pain as unlikely to have a neuropathic component in 13 patients, as likely to have a neuropathic component in 2 patients, and as possibly neuropathic in 4 patients. There was no significant difference in the pain level of patients with scores of ≤12 and ≥13 on painDETECT. All patients reported trigger pain; the positive rate was high for electric shock pain, radiating pain, and pain attacks and low for a burning or tingling sensation, pain elicited by a light touch, and pain caused by cold or hot stimulation.

Conclusion: The painDETECT questionnaire may not reliably identify LBP caused by superior/middle CN-E as neuropathic pain. A diagnosis of LBP due to CN-E must be made carefully because symptoms resemble nociceptive pain.

PainDETECT 用于评估 Cluneal 神经卡压引起的腰痛的可靠性
背景:上/中锁骨神经卡压(CN-E)是腰背痛(LBP)的诱因之一。疼痛DETECT问卷用于描述CN-E症状的特征:19名CN-E引起的腰背痛患者(上CN-E=7;中CN-E=12)在手术前参加了日语疼痛DETECT问卷调查。12分或以下为 "不可能有神经病理性成分",19分或以上为 "可能有神经病理性疼痛",13-18分为 "可能有神经病理性疼痛"。枸杞痛的严重程度通过数字评分量表、罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷和EuroQol-5 dimension-5水平进行记录:结果:painDETECT 的平均得分为 11.8 分,在上部 CN-E 组和中部 CN-E 组之间没有明显差异。我们将 13 名患者的腰痛归类为不可能有神经病理性成分,2 名患者的腰痛归类为可能有神经病理性成分,4 名患者的腰痛归类为可能有神经病理性成分。在 painDETECT 评分≤12 分和≥13 分的患者中,疼痛程度没有明显差异。所有患者都报告了触发痛;电击痛、放射痛和疼痛发作的阳性率较高,而烧灼感或刺痛感、轻触引起的疼痛以及冷或热刺激引起的疼痛的阳性率较低:结论:painDETECT 问卷可能无法可靠地将上/中段 CN-E 引起的腰痛确定为神经病理性疼痛。由于症状与痛觉疼痛相似,因此必须谨慎诊断由中枢神经系统-E引起的枸杞痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nippon Medical School
Journal of Nippon Medical School MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: The international effort to understand, treat and control disease involve clinicians and researchers from many medical and biological science disciplines. The Journal of Nippon Medical School (JNMS) is the official journal of the Medical Association of Nippon Medical School and is dedicated to furthering international exchange of medical science experience and opinion. It provides an international forum for researchers in the fields of bascic and clinical medicine to introduce, discuss and exchange thier novel achievements in biomedical science and a platform for the worldwide dissemination and steering of biomedical knowledge for the benefit of human health and welfare. Properly reasoned discussions disciplined by appropriate references to existing bodies of knowledge or aimed at motivating the creation of such knowledge is the aim of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信