Association between stress hyperglycemia ratio and in-hospital outcomes: findings from the improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome (CCC-ACS) Project.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Wen-Jie Wang, Ke-Xin Wang, Jia-Long Niu, Yi-Xuan Liu, Hai-Long Ge, Hua Shen
{"title":"Association between stress hyperglycemia ratio and in-hospital outcomes: findings from the improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome (CCC-ACS) Project.","authors":"Wen-Jie Wang, Ke-Xin Wang, Jia-Long Niu, Yi-Xuan Liu, Hai-Long Ge, Hua Shen","doi":"10.26599/1671-5411.2024.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) could provide accurate information on the acute status of hyperglycemia. The relationship between SHR and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) prognosis remains unclear. This study was conducted to identity the association between SHR and in-hospital outcomes in patients with ACS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 12,010 patients were eventually enrolled in the study. The relationship between SHR and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) was then modeled by restricted cubic spline (RCS) curves, and all patients were divided into three groups according to the results. The multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the associations between the SHR and in-hospital outcomes, described as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses were also performed on different diseases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of this cohort was 63 (54, 71) years old, and 8942 (74.5%) were male. Group 1 was defined as SHR < 0.6 (<i>n</i> = 426), Group 2 was defined as SHR between 0.6 and 1 (<i>n</i> = 5821), and Group 3 was defined as SHR > 1 (<i>n</i> = 5763). Compared with Group 2, Group 1 (OR = 1.891, 95% CI: 1.028-3.479, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and Group 3 (OR = 1.868, 95% CI: 1.434-2.434, <i>P</i> < 0.001) had higher risks of suffering from in-hospital MACEs. SHR was associated with higher risks of in-hospital MACEs in the subgroups of DM [OR = 2.282, 95% CI: 1.477-3.524).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both low and high SHR levels were independently associated with in-hospital MACEs. Young males with DM, hypertension, and decreased renal function had much higher risks of suffering from SHR-correlated MACEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Cardiology","volume":"21 6","pages":"658-668"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11224654/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26599/1671-5411.2024.06.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) could provide accurate information on the acute status of hyperglycemia. The relationship between SHR and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) prognosis remains unclear. This study was conducted to identity the association between SHR and in-hospital outcomes in patients with ACS.

Methods: A total of 12,010 patients were eventually enrolled in the study. The relationship between SHR and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) was then modeled by restricted cubic spline (RCS) curves, and all patients were divided into three groups according to the results. The multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the associations between the SHR and in-hospital outcomes, described as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses were also performed on different diseases.

Results: The median age of this cohort was 63 (54, 71) years old, and 8942 (74.5%) were male. Group 1 was defined as SHR < 0.6 (n = 426), Group 2 was defined as SHR between 0.6 and 1 (n = 5821), and Group 3 was defined as SHR > 1 (n = 5763). Compared with Group 2, Group 1 (OR = 1.891, 95% CI: 1.028-3.479, P < 0.001) and Group 3 (OR = 1.868, 95% CI: 1.434-2.434, P < 0.001) had higher risks of suffering from in-hospital MACEs. SHR was associated with higher risks of in-hospital MACEs in the subgroups of DM [OR = 2.282, 95% CI: 1.477-3.524).

Conclusions: Both low and high SHR levels were independently associated with in-hospital MACEs. Young males with DM, hypertension, and decreased renal function had much higher risks of suffering from SHR-correlated MACEs.

应激性高血糖比率与院内预后之间的关系:改善中国心血管疾病护理--急性冠脉综合征(CCC-ACS)项目的研究结果。
背景:应激性高血糖比值(SHR)可提供有关高血糖急性状态的准确信息。但 SHR 与急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)预后的关系仍不明确。本研究旨在确定 SHR 与急性冠状动脉综合征患者院内预后之间的关系:最终共有 12010 名患者参与了研究。方法:研究最终共纳入了 12010 名患者,然后通过限制性三次样条曲线(RCS)建立了 SHR 与院内主要不良心血管事件(MACE)之间的关系模型,并根据结果将所有患者分为三组。多变量逻辑回归分析用于确定SHR与院内预后之间的关系,以几率比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)表示。此外,还对不同疾病进行了分组分析:队列的中位年龄为 63(54,71)岁,8942 人(74.5%)为男性。第 1 组定义为 SHR < 0.6(426 人),第 2 组定义为 SHR 介于 0.6 和 1 之间(5821 人),第 3 组定义为 SHR > 1(5763 人)。与第 2 组相比,第 1 组(OR = 1.891,95% CI:1.028-3.479,P <0.001)和第 3 组(OR = 1.868,95% CI:1.434-2.434,P <0.001)发生院内 MACE 的风险更高。在DM亚组中,SHR与较高的院内MACE风险相关[OR = 2.282, 95% CI: 1.477-3.524]:结论:低和高SHR水平均与院内MACEs独立相关。患有糖尿病、高血压和肾功能减退的年轻男性发生 SHR 相关并发症的风险更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geriatric Cardiology
Journal of Geriatric Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1161
期刊介绍: JGC focuses on both basic research and clinical practice to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease in the aged people, especially those with concomitant disease of other major organ-systems, such as the lungs, the kidneys, liver, central nervous system, gastrointestinal tract or endocrinology, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信